Arbitration Law in Brazil
Arbitration Law in Brazil
Brazil has a well-developed and robust legal framework for arbitration, making it one of the leading jurisdictions in Latin America for resolving disputes through arbitration. The country’s arbitration laws are designed to encourage both domestic and international arbitration and are aligned with international standards, including the UNCITRAL Model Law and other key treaties such as the New York Convention.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Brazil
Arbitration Act (Law No. 9,307/1996)
- The principal legislation governing arbitration in Brazil is the Arbitration Act (Law No. 9,307/1996), enacted on September 23, 1996. This law was designed to modernize and encourage the use of arbitration as an alternative to traditional litigation in Brazil.
- The law was revised in 2015 by Law No. 13,129/2015, which introduced several changes to further improve the arbitration process and align it with international practices. Key updates included measures to enhance the enforceability of arbitral awards and clarify issues related to judicial intervention.
UNCITRAL Model Law
- Brazil's arbitration laws are broadly aligned with the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), and the country has adopted a pro-arbitration stance, ensuring minimal judicial interference in the arbitration process.
New York Convention (1958)
- Brazil is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). This treaty enables the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards in Brazil, making it easier for foreign arbitral awards to be enforced within the country.
2. Key Features of Arbitration in Brazil
Arbitration Agreement
- Arbitration in Brazil is based on a valid arbitration agreement, which must be in writing. The agreement should clearly indicate the parties' intent to resolve disputes through arbitration rather than through litigation.
- The arbitration agreement can be a separate contract or part of a broader agreement. It must define critical elements, such as the arbitration procedure, the seat of arbitration, and the arbitrators to be appointed.
Arbitral Tribunal
- In Brazil, arbitral tribunals are typically composed of one or three arbitrators, depending on the agreement between the parties. The parties can agree on the number of arbitrators, and if they fail to do so, the tribunal is usually composed of three.
- Arbitrators in Brazil are required to be independent and impartial, and they are usually selected based on their expertise in the relevant field.
- Brazilian courts can step in if the parties are unable to agree on the appointment of arbitrators, although this is rare.
Arbitration Procedure
- The arbitration procedure in Brazil is flexible, with the parties free to choose the rules governing the arbitration (such as UNCITRAL, ICC, or ad hoc arbitration rules).
- In the absence of an agreement between the parties on procedures, the arbitrators are authorized to set the rules themselves.
- The procedure is designed to be faster and more cost-effective than litigation, with limited judicial intervention during the process.
3. Judicial Intervention in Arbitration
Minimal Judicial Intervention
- Brazilian law favors minimal judicial intervention in the arbitration process. Courts are generally limited to providing assistance in specific situations, such as:
- Enforcing arbitration agreements.
- Appointing arbitrators when the parties fail to agree.
- Enforcing arbitral awards.
- Courts are typically not allowed to intervene in the substance of the dispute while the arbitration is ongoing.
Setting Aside Arbitral Awards
- One of the limited circumstances under which a Brazilian court can intervene is when an arbitral award is challenged.
- An arbitral award may be set aside by the courts only under narrow grounds, such as:
- Violation of public policy.
- Lack of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal.
- Failure to provide due process (e.g., one party was not properly notified of the proceedings).
- Violation of basic principles of Brazilian law.
4. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Arbitral Awards
- Domestic awards issued by an arbitral tribunal in Brazil are automatically enforceable in Brazilian courts. If a party fails to comply with an award voluntarily, the winning party can seek enforcement by applying to the Superior Court of Justice (STJ).
- Brazilian courts generally provide swift recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitral awards.
Foreign Arbitral Awards
- Brazil recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention. Foreign arbitral awards can be enforced in Brazil, but they must first be recognized by the Brazilian courts.
- Recognition is typically granted unless the foreign award violates Brazilian public policy (ordre public). The grounds for refusal of enforcement are very limited, and the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) is responsible for this process.
Public Policy
- As with many countries, public policy plays a crucial role in enforcing arbitral awards. Awards that violate Brazil’s public policy may not be recognized or enforced by Brazilian courts. However, this exception is interpreted narrowly, meaning that the courts will not readily interfere with arbitral decisions unless there is a fundamental violation of Brazilian legal principles.
5. Arbitration Institutions in Brazil
Brazilian Center for Mediation and Arbitration (CBMA)
- The CBMA is one of Brazil's leading institutions for arbitration, providing mediation and arbitration services for both domestic and international disputes. The CBMA offers a neutral venue and a set of rules for dispute resolution.
São Paulo Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Center (CIESP/FIESP)
- The CIESP/FIESP Arbitration Center is another important institution for arbitration in Brazil. It is well-known for its expertise in business disputes, and it follows internationally recognized rules to manage the arbitration process.
Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV)
- The FGV Arbitration Center is part of the Getúlio Vargas Foundation, one of the leading educational institutions in Brazil. This center handles international commercial arbitration and follows the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.
International Arbitration Institutions
- Brazilian parties also frequently use international arbitration institutions like the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC).
- These institutions are often chosen for cross-border disputes and bring a wealth of experience in managing complex international arbitrations.
6. Recent Developments in Arbitration in Brazil
- Reform in 2015 (Law No. 13,129)
- The 2015 reform to Brazil’s Arbitration Act introduced several significant changes to improve arbitration practices, including:
- Recognition of interim measures granted by foreign arbitrators.
- Clarification of judicial review of arbitration-related matters, including the enforcement of arbitral awards and the possibility of granting interim relief.
- Enhancing confidentiality in arbitration proceedings.
- The 2015 reform to Brazil’s Arbitration Act introduced several significant changes to improve arbitration practices, including:
- Growth of Arbitration in Brazil
- Arbitration in Brazil has grown significantly over the past few decades, and the country has become one of the leading jurisdictions in Latin America for resolving international and domestic commercial disputes.
- The Brazilian government has actively promoted arbitration as an effective mechanism for resolving commercial disputes and reducing the burden on the judicial system.
7. Arbitration for International Disputes in Brazil
Arbitration Hub in Latin America
- Brazil is increasingly becoming a hub for international arbitration in Latin America due to its pro-arbitration legal framework, including its alignment with the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention.
- International parties involved in disputes with Brazilian entities often choose Brazil as a seat for arbitration due to its modern arbitration laws, its membership in global treaties, and the presence of reputable arbitration institutions.
Cross-Border Arbitration
- With its focus on international commercial arbitration, Brazil is an attractive destination for cross-border disputes, particularly in sectors like energy, construction, finance, and telecommunications.
Conclusion
Brazil offers a strong legal framework for arbitration, supported by the Arbitration Act (Law No. 9,307/1996) and its commitment to international conventions such as the New York Convention. The 2015 reforms have modernized the legal landscape, enhancing the effectiveness and appeal of arbitration for both domestic and international disputes.
Brazil’s arbitration institutions are well-regarded, and the country is increasingly seen as a leading arbitration venue in Latin America. The pro-arbitration stance and minimal judicial intervention make Brazil an ideal jurisdiction for those seeking a neutral, efficient, and internationally recognized mechanism for resolving disputes.
RELATED Blog
0 comments