Arbitration Law in Western Sahara
Arbitration Law in Western Sahara is a complex issue due to the region's political status and ongoing territorial dispute. Western Sahara is a disputed territory in North Africa, primarily claimed by Morocco and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), which is backed by the Polisario Front. The legal and arbitration framework in Western Sahara is not as clearly defined as in other jurisdictions, and the region is not recognized as an independent sovereign state.
However, arbitration in Western Sahara may depend on which authority or jurisdiction the parties involved choose to apply, as well as the legal systems operating in the area.
Key Points to Consider:
1. Political and Legal Context
- Territorial Dispute: Western Sahara is claimed by Morocco and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), but Morocco administers most of the territory, while the Polisario Front controls parts of the region and operates out of refugee camps in Algeria.
- Moroccan Influence: The majority of arbitration cases in the region may follow Moroccan law or the legal system of the governing authority in the area controlled by Morocco, which includes provisions for arbitration under Moroccan law.
- International Law: International organizations like the United Nations have not granted sovereignty to either party and have encouraged peaceful negotiation and self-determination for the people of Western Sahara. International law and the UN's stance on arbitration may also play a role in resolving disputes.
2. Legal Framework
- Moroccan Law: Since Morocco administers most of the region, Moroccan arbitration law would likely govern disputes in Western Sahara, particularly those involving commercial or contractual matters. The Moroccan Code of Civil Procedure includes provisions for arbitration, similar to France’s arbitration law due to Morocco's historical ties to French legal systems.
- The Moroccan Arbitration Law provides a framework for domestic and international arbitration, and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (to which Morocco is a party) would apply to enforce foreign arbitral awards in the region.
- SADR and Polisario Front: The Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) claims authority over Western Sahara and may use its own local arbitration mechanisms under its legal system, though this system is not internationally recognized and may be limited in practice.
3. Arbitration Procedure
- Arbitration in Morocco: Under Moroccan law, arbitration proceedings are generally governed by the Moroccan Code of Civil Procedure, which allows for domestic and international arbitration. The parties involved can agree on the venue, language, and rules governing the arbitration.
- International Arbitration: Given the complexity of the situation, international arbitration would likely be preferred for disputes involving external entities. International arbitration centers like the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and others could be involved in disputes in the region, provided the parties agree to such institutions.
4. Jurisdictional Challenges
- Due to the disputed sovereignty of Western Sahara, any arbitration or legal process would likely face jurisdictional challenges. The legal framework could depend on the party’s alignment with either Morocco or the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic.
- In practice, parties based in the territory under Moroccan control would likely use Moroccan courts or arbitral institutions for resolving disputes. Conversely, parties aligned with the Polisario Front or based outside the region may seek arbitration through international forums or legal systems of countries sympathetic to their cause.
5. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Under Moroccan Law: Since Morocco is a party to the New York Convention, foreign arbitral awards would generally be enforceable in Moroccan-administered parts of Western Sahara. The Moroccan judiciary would be the authority responsible for enforcement.
- In SADR-controlled Areas: Enforcement of arbitral awards could be more problematic in areas controlled by the Polisario Front or the SADR due to lack of recognized state institutions and international recognition of the Sahrawi government.
6. International Dispute Resolution
- International Arbitration: For international commercial or investment disputes, international arbitration would be the preferred method. Parties can choose neutral venues like Paris, London, or Geneva to resolve disputes, and the outcome would likely be enforceable in countries that are signatories to international conventions, such as the New York Convention.
7. Recent Trends and Developments
- Political Settlement: The issue of Western Sahara remains unresolved, with ongoing efforts by the United Nations to broker a political solution, including a potential referendum on self-determination. This political situation influences the legal and arbitration frameworks in the region.
- Growing Investment and Trade: As the region sees increasing commercial activity (especially in sectors like mining, fisheries, and natural resources), the demand for arbitration mechanisms could increase. International companies operating in Western Sahara may prefer to resolve disputes through international arbitration due to the sensitive political environment.
Conclusion
Arbitration in Western Sahara is a nuanced issue, largely shaped by the territorial dispute and the legal frameworks of Morocco and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. In areas controlled by Morocco, Moroccan arbitration law and international arbitration mechanisms are likely to govern disputes. However, in regions under the control of the Polisario Front, local arbitration procedures may apply, though these would not be internationally recognized.
For international parties, neutral international arbitration venues would likely be the preferred mechanism to ensure impartiality and enforceability of awards, though jurisdictional issues related to the dispute over the region’s sovereignty may complicate the arbitration process.
RELATED Blog
0 comments