Commercial Matters Involving Arbitration Disputes Can Only Be Heard By Commercial Court Of Status Of District...
Here’s a refined and consolidated overview on the jurisdiction of commercial courts in India concerning arbitration-related commercial disputes, bolstered by key case law:
1. Principle Statutory Doctrine: Only District Judge-Level Courts Handle Arbitration Matters
Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act) defines “Court” under Section 2(1)(e) as the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district—i.e., the District Judge's court—and explicitly excludes any lower-grade civil courts or Courts of Small Causes
In Madhya Pradesh High Court’s landmark judgment (March 2021), it held that commercial matters involving arbitration disputes must be heard only by commercial courts of the status of District Judge or Additional District Judge—not by Civil Judge-level courts, even if designated commercial courts under the Commercial Courts Act exist at that level
The reasoning: since the statutory definition of “court,” for the purposes of arbitration, encompasses only the highest judicial authority of a district, the legislature intended arbitration disputes to avoid “judicial supervision” by lower courts
2. Supporting Precedents: Consistent Interpretation Across Jurisdictions
Yashwardhan Raghuwanshi v. District And Sessions Judge (February 2021) reinforced that only the District Judge or, where necessary, Additional District Judge, may adjudicate arbitration matters; Civil Judge Class‑I courts are incompetent to do so
A detailed discussion in Legal Services India clarified that while arbitration matters must go before the Principal Civil Court, non-arbitration commercial disputes may be handled by lower-tier commercial courts
3. Judicial Divergence & Supreme Court’s Stance
Some states (e.g., Odisha) have conferred jurisdiction for arbitration-related applications or appeals to Senior Civil Judge-level commercial courts, based on notifications under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015
The Supreme Court upheld this model, endorsing that designated Commercial Courts subordinate to the District Judge may adjudicate arbitration-related matters when empowered by state government notifications
4. Conclusion: Jurisdiction Depends on Statutory Framework and Notifications
| Jurisdiction Type | Applicable Court(s) |
|---|---|
| Arbitration-related commercial disputes | Only Commercial Courts of status: District Judge or Additional District Judge (per A&C Act §2(1)(e)) |
| Lower-level Commercial Courts (e.g., Civil Judge Class-I) | Incompetent, unless specifically empowered by statute or notification |
| Exception under Supreme Court | Valid where state law empowers subordinate Commercial Courts for arbitration matters (e.g., Odisha) |
5. Sample Cases for Reference
Madhya Pradesh HC (2021): Arbitration matters must be handled by District Judge / ADD Cart; Civil Judge cannot entertain such cases
Yashwardhan Raghuwanshi (2021): Civil Judge Class‑I lacks jurisdiction in commercial‑arbitration matters
Odisha Model & Supreme Court Confirmation: Permits subordinate Commercial Courts to hear arbitration cases if empowered by law
Summary
Yes, as a general rule, only courts of the rank of District Judge (or Additional District Judge) are statutorily competent to hear commercial matters involving arbitration under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act. Lower courts—even if styled as commercial courts—are typically not competent, unless there's a valid statutory or executive notification assigning them jurisdiction, as upheld by the Supreme Court in specific contexts (e.g., Odisha).
RELATED Blog
0 comments