Arbitration Law in Guam (US)
Arbitration Law in Guam (US)
Guam is an unincorporated territory of the United States, and as such, it follows the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) for arbitration matters, alongside local Guam laws that may apply to arbitration processes.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Guam
Guam follows both federal and local arbitration laws. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which applies throughout the United States, governs arbitration agreements and awards in Guam. In addition, Guam's Arbitration Act may provide additional provisions or address specific local practices.
- Federal Arbitration Act (FAA): The FAA provides a comprehensive framework for the enforcement of arbitration agreements and the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. It applies to both domestic and international arbitrations in Guam.
- Guam Code: In some cases, Guam’s local code of laws may govern aspects of arbitration, including the appointment of arbitrators and enforcement issues that pertain to local practices.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Requirement: Like in the broader United States, for an arbitration agreement to be enforceable in Guam, it must be in writing. This can take the form of a clause within a larger contract or a standalone agreement.
- Validity and Enforceability: Under the FAA, a court in Guam will generally uphold an arbitration agreement unless there is an issue with fraud, duress, or unconscionability.
3. Arbitration Procedure
- Arbitration Rules: Arbitration in Guam is typically conducted under the rules of the arbitration institution (e.g., the American Arbitration Association (AAA) or JAMS) or ad-hoc arbitration rules, depending on what the parties agree to. If no specific rules are agreed upon, the parties may default to procedures in the FAA or Guam’s local rules.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties can select their arbitrators, or, if they fail to agree, the courts may intervene and appoint arbitrators. In many cases, a tribunal may consist of one or three arbitrators.
- Ad-Hoc or Institutional Arbitration: In Guam, parties can choose between ad-hoc arbitration (unaffiliated with an institution) or institutional arbitration (conducted under the rules of an organization like the AAA or ICC).
4. Role of the Courts
Judicial Support: The courts in Guam play a limited role in arbitration, usually providing support only for enforcement of the agreement or award. However, if the arbitration agreement is contested, the courts may determine the validity of the agreement or compel the parties to arbitrate if there is an existing agreement.
Challenging Awards: Guam courts will generally not overturn arbitral awards except for limited reasons under the FAA. Grounds for challenge include issues like:
- Corruption or Fraud in the arbitration process
- Arbitrator Bias or lack of impartiality
- Violations of Public Policy
- Lack of Jurisdiction of the arbitrator
Enforcement of Awards: Guam courts recognize and enforce both domestic and foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention and the FAA. If the parties wish to enforce an arbitral award, they may petition the court in Guam to do so, provided the award meets the standards for enforcement under the FAA.
5. Confidentiality
Arbitration proceedings in Guam generally maintain confidentiality, unless the parties agree otherwise or are required to disclose information due to a legal obligation. The confidentiality of the arbitral award is also maintained, but enforcement proceedings may lead to public disclosure if necessary.
6. Arbitration Institutions in Guam
Guam does not have a prominent local arbitration institution, so businesses typically rely on national or international arbitration bodies such as:
- American Arbitration Association (AAA): Provides a wide range of arbitration services, from commercial to consumer and employment disputes.
- JAMS: Another widely recognized provider of alternative dispute resolution services.
- Ad-Hoc Arbitration: Parties may also opt for ad-hoc arbitration based on UNCITRAL rules or their own procedural rules.
7. Advantages of Arbitration in Guam
- Federal Law Framework: Being subject to the FAA, Guam benefits from a well-established, predictable legal framework for arbitration.
- International Recognition: As part of the U.S., Guam benefits from international agreements such as the New York Convention, ensuring enforceability of foreign arbitral awards in Guam and vice versa.
- Flexibility: Arbitration in Guam, like in the rest of the U.S., is flexible and allows the parties to tailor the procedure to their needs, making it an attractive option for resolving disputes.
8. Challenges of Arbitration in Guam
- Limited Local Arbitration Infrastructure: Since Guam does not have a major local arbitration institution, parties may face some challenges in finding local arbitrators or an institution to oversee the arbitration. Most disputes are likely to be referred to national or international arbitration institutions.
- Potential Delays: Given that some arbitration may require the involvement of mainland U.S.-based institutions or arbitrators, there may be logistical issues such as the costs or travel for arbitrators.
9. Arbitration Awards and Enforcement
- Recognition of Awards: Arbitration awards are recognized and enforceable in Guam under U.S. law, and specifically under the New York Convention. This ensures that both domestic and international awards can be enforced.
- Setting Aside Awards: Awards may be contested or set aside only on very narrow grounds, such as if the award violates U.S. public policy or the arbitration process was fundamentally flawed.
Conclusion
Arbitration in Guam is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), as well as relevant local laws. The process is flexible, and arbitration agreements are enforceable under both federal and local law. While there is no major local arbitration institution, Guam businesses and individuals typically utilize national institutions like the AAA or JAMS, or may choose ad-hoc arbitration based on their needs. Arbitration is widely recognized for its ability to offer a confidential and streamlined alternative to court disputes, making it an effective means of dispute resolution in Guam.
0 comments