Arbitration Law in Togo
Arbitration Law in Togo is governed by the OHADA Uniform Act on Arbitration, which was adopted as part of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) framework. OHADA is a regional organization that harmonizes business laws across 17 African countries, including Togo. The OHADA Uniform Act on Arbitration came into effect in 1999 and was revised in 2017. The legal framework established by OHADA plays a significant role in the arbitration process in Togo, both for domestic and international disputes.
Key Features of Arbitration Law in Togo:
1. Legal Framework
- OHADA Uniform Act on Arbitration (1999, revised in 2017): The OHADA Uniform Act is the primary source of arbitration law in Togo. It provides a comprehensive set of rules for both international and domestic arbitration. The Act covers various aspects of arbitration, such as the formation of arbitration agreements, the conduct of proceedings, and the enforcement of awards.
- Togo's Arbitration Law: As a member of OHADA, Togo applies the OHADA Arbitration Act. Togo does not have separate domestic arbitration legislation apart from this OHADA Act, meaning the arbitration process in Togo is largely governed by the OHADA framework.
- New York Convention: Togo is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). This provides the framework for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Togo, reinforcing the international character of the arbitration law.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: Under OHADA law, an arbitration agreement must be in writing. The arbitration agreement can be a separate document or part of a larger contract. It must clearly express the parties' intention to resolve disputes through arbitration.
- Scope of Arbitration Agreement: The arbitration agreement must specify the types of disputes that are subject to arbitration. In Togo, the courts generally honor arbitration clauses, compelling the parties to resolve disputes through arbitration unless the agreement is invalid or unenforceable.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number of Arbitrators: The parties are free to agree on the number of arbitrators. Generally, an arbitration tribunal consists of one or three arbitrators.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties are free to appoint their arbitrators. If the parties cannot agree on the arbitrators, the OHADA Arbitration Act allows for an institution or a national court to make the appointment. The Togo Arbitration Center can assist in the appointment process.
- Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators are required to be impartial and independent. They must disclose any potential conflicts of interest before the arbitration process begins.
- Qualifications: While the law does not prescribe specific qualifications for arbitrators, they typically possess expertise in the subject matter of the dispute and have relevant legal or technical knowledge.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: The parties have a high degree of autonomy in determining the arbitration process. They can choose the seat of arbitration, the language of the proceedings, and the procedural rules.
- Institutional and Ad Hoc Arbitration: Togo allows both institutional and ad hoc arbitration. For institutional arbitration, parties may refer their disputes to arbitration institutions such as the Togo Arbitration Center or International Court of Arbitration (ICC), whereas ad hoc arbitration can be carried out without the involvement of an arbitration institution.
- Language of Arbitration: The parties may choose the language of the arbitration. In practice, French is often used as it is the official language of Togo and OHADA.
- Interim Measures: Arbitrators in Togo have the authority to grant interim measures, such as asset preservation or orders of injunction, to safeguard the arbitration process and protect the rights of the parties. The courts can also enforce interim measures if necessary.
- Confidentiality: Arbitration proceedings in Togo are generally confidential. The details of the dispute, as well as any documents submitted during the arbitration, are not disclosed unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Final and Binding: Arbitral awards are generally final and binding on the parties. The parties are required to comply with the award unless it is challenged or set aside on specific grounds.
- Types of Remedies: Arbitrators can award various remedies, including monetary compensation, specific performance, and injunctive relief.
- Written Award: The tribunal must provide a written award with a clear rationale for the decision.
- Time Limits: Arbitrators are required to issue the award within a reasonable time frame. The OHADA Act generally suggests that the award should be issued within six months from the closure of proceedings, although this can be extended with the agreement of the parties or for valid reasons.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Awards: Domestic arbitral awards are enforceable in Togo. If a party refuses to comply with a domestic arbitral award, the other party can apply to the courts for enforcement.
- Foreign Awards: Togo, as a signatory to the New York Convention, recognizes and enforces foreign arbitral awards. However, foreign awards can only be enforced if they do not violate Togolese public policy.
- Grounds for Refusal: Enforcement of foreign awards may be refused on specific grounds, including:
- The award is contrary to public policy (ordre public).
- The subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable under Togolese law.
- The arbitration process was not conducted in accordance with the agreement of the parties.
- There was a lack of due process or the award violates fundamental procedural principles.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Judicial Review: The OHADA Uniform Act provides limited grounds for judicial review of arbitral awards. The courts may only set aside awards if:
- The tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.
- There was a serious procedural irregularity (e.g., failure to give proper notice).
- The award is in contravention of public policy.
- Time Limit for Challenge: A party seeking to challenge an arbitral award must do so within 30 days from the date of receiving the award. The court will review the grounds for setting aside the award.
8. Role of Courts in Arbitration
- Supportive Role: Courts in Togo play a supportive role in arbitration. They assist in enforcing arbitration agreements, appointing arbitrators if necessary, and granting interim measures.
- Stay of Court Proceedings: If there is a valid arbitration agreement, the Togolese courts will generally stay court proceedings and refer the matter to arbitration.
- Judicial Assistance: Courts can also assist in the enforcement of arbitral awards, especially foreign awards, and may provide assistance in the enforcement of interim measures ordered by the arbitrators.
9. Arbitration Institutions in Togo
- Togo Arbitration Center: The Togo Arbitration Center is the primary institution for institutional arbitration in Togo. It is recognized for administering both domestic and international disputes and follows the rules of the OHADA Uniform Act on Arbitration.
- International Institutions: Togo also allows the use of international arbitration institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) for cross-border disputes.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- Growth in Arbitration: Togo, as part of the OHADA region, has seen a growing interest in arbitration, particularly in commercial and investment disputes. The legal framework established by OHADA is seen as an advantage in attracting international businesses and investment.
- Regional Arbitration Hub: Togo is positioning itself as a potential regional hub for arbitration in West Africa, given its alignment with OHADA’s harmonized laws. The Togo Arbitration Center continues to develop and expand its role in international dispute resolution.
- Enforcement and Practical Challenges: While Togo’s legal framework supports the recognition and enforcement of awards, practical challenges related to enforcement in some local courts may exist. Further judicial training and procedural reforms could enhance the efficiency of enforcement processes.
Conclusion
Togo’s arbitration law is governed by the OHADA Uniform Act on Arbitration, which ensures a modern, comprehensive framework for resolving disputes. The Act brings Togo in line with international arbitration standards, and the country is committed to facilitating both domestic and international arbitration. With the support of institutions such as the Togo Arbitration Center, and its adherence to the New York Convention, Togo is increasingly recognized as a reliable jurisdiction for arbitration in West Africa. However, practical issues such as enforcement challenges may need further attention to enhance the overall efficiency of arbitration in the country.
RELATED Blog
0 comments