Arbitration Law in El Salvado
Arbitration Law in El Salvador
El Salvador has a modern and well-established legal framework for arbitration, both for domestic and international disputes. The country’s arbitration laws are designed to promote arbitration as an effective method of resolving commercial disputes. El Salvador is a member of several international conventions related to arbitration and has enacted a comprehensive legal framework that aligns with international best practices.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in El Salvador
The primary sources of arbitration law in El Salvador include:
The Arbitration and Mediation Law (Ley de Arbitraje y Mediación), Decree No. 49 (1996):
This law governs arbitration in El Salvador and provides the legal structure for both domestic and international arbitration. It is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and promotes arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism.
The Civil Code:
El Salvador's Civil Code provides additional provisions on arbitration, particularly concerning commercial contracts and obligations. These provisions help ensure that contracts involving arbitration clauses are enforceable under Salvadoran law.
The Constitution of El Salvador (1983):
The Constitution of El Salvador guarantees access to justice and supports the use of arbitration as an alternative means of resolving disputes. The use of arbitration is recognized in both civil and commercial matters.
International Treaties:
El Salvador is a signatory to several international conventions that promote the use of arbitration, including:
- The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which facilitates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in El Salvador.
- The Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (Panama Convention), which further strengthens El Salvador's commitment to international arbitration.
2. Arbitration Agreement and Procedure
Arbitration Agreement
An arbitration agreement in El Salvador must be made in writing, and it can either be a separate agreement or a clause within a broader contract. The key elements for a valid arbitration agreement include:
- Written Form: The agreement must be in writing, which includes digital or electronic agreements.
- Scope: The agreement must specify the disputes that are to be resolved by arbitration, ensuring that the scope of arbitration is clearly defined.
- Jurisdiction and Rules: The arbitration agreement should specify the seat (location) of the arbitration, the number of arbitrators, and the procedural rules.
Arbitration Procedure
The procedure for arbitration in El Salvador follows the Arbitration and Mediation Law and the UNCITRAL Model Law. Key aspects of the procedure include:
- Selection of Arbitrators: The parties are free to agree on the selection of arbitrators. If they cannot agree, the arbitration institution or a court can appoint the arbitrators.
- Arbitration Rules: The parties may choose the procedural rules that govern the arbitration, such as the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or rules of a recognized institution (e.g., ICC or CIADI). If no agreement is made, the arbitrators can determine the rules.
- Language: The language of the arbitration is typically chosen by the parties. If not specified, the arbitrators will decide the language.
- Time Frame: Arbitration is generally faster than court litigation, and the law encourages expeditious proceedings. The parties and arbitrators are expected to set reasonable deadlines for the arbitration process.
3. Judicial Intervention in Arbitration
Although arbitration in El Salvador is designed to minimize judicial involvement, there are specific instances where the courts may intervene:
Compelling Arbitration:
If a party refuses to arbitrate in the presence of a valid arbitration agreement, the other party can request the courts to compel arbitration. El Salvador’s courts will typically uphold the arbitration agreement and direct the parties to arbitration.
Appointment of Arbitrators:
If the parties cannot agree on the selection of arbitrators, the court or an arbitration institution may step in to make the appointment.
Interim Measures:
The courts in El Salvador can issue interim measures, such as freezing assets or ordering temporary injunctions, to preserve the rights of the parties during arbitration. These measures are often sought when there is a risk of harm to the enforcement of the arbitral award.
Setting Aside an Award:
The courts in El Salvador can set aside an arbitral award under limited circumstances, such as:
- Lack of Jurisdiction: If the tribunal exceeds its jurisdiction or decides on matters outside the scope of the arbitration agreement.
- Improper Composition: If the arbitral tribunal is not properly constituted according to the agreement or the law.
- Violation of Public Policy: If the award contradicts the fundamental public policy of El Salvador or violates the basic principles of Salvadoran law.
4. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards
Arbitration awards made within El Salvador are enforceable as judicial decisions. The winning party can request the courts to enforce the award, and the courts will generally recognize and enforce the award unless there are grounds for refusal.
Foreign Arbitral Awards
As El Salvador is a signatory to the New York Convention, foreign arbitral awards are enforceable in the country. To enforce a foreign arbitral award, the party seeking enforcement must submit the award to the Salvadoran courts. The courts will examine whether the award complies with the requirements of the New York Convention and El Salvadoran law. Grounds for refusal of enforcement are limited and typically relate to procedural issues or violations of public policy.
5. Arbitration Institutions in El Salvador
Several recognized arbitration institutions in El Salvador offer services for both domestic and international arbitration, including:
The Center for Mediation and Arbitration of El Salvador (CMA):
The CMA is the primary institution for administering arbitration in El Salvador. It provides services for resolving commercial disputes and is recognized as a reliable institution for arbitration, both for national and international cases. The CMA offers a set of arbitration rules based on international standards.
The Salvadoran Chamber of Commerce (Cámara de Comercio de El Salvador):
The Chamber of Commerce also has an arbitration division that provides arbitration services for businesses. It offers arbitration under both national and international rules and is an important institution for commercial dispute resolution.
6. Advantages of Arbitration in El Salvador
International Recognition of Awards:
El Salvador’s adherence to the New York Convention makes it an attractive jurisdiction for resolving international disputes, as foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforceable in the country.
Efficient Dispute Resolution:
Arbitration in El Salvador is generally faster and more flexible than traditional court litigation. The Arbitration and Mediation Law encourages an efficient dispute resolution process.
Party Autonomy:
The law provides a high level of autonomy for the parties in arbitration, including the ability to select arbitrators, determine the procedural rules, and choose the seat of arbitration.
Developed Infrastructure:
El Salvador has developed a robust arbitration infrastructure, with institutions like CMA offering services in line with international standards.
7. Challenges of Arbitration in El Salvador
Limited Use in Some Sectors:
Arbitration is not as widely used in certain sectors, particularly in smaller businesses or domestic disputes, compared to larger commercial contracts.
Judicial Involvement:
While the legal framework limits judicial involvement, there may still be occasional delays or challenges in the enforcement of arbitral awards, particularly in relation to judicial attitudes toward arbitration.
Inconsistent Application of the Law:
In some cases, local courts may have limited experience in handling international arbitration matters, which may lead to inconsistencies in the application of the law or delays in enforcement.
Conclusion
El Salvador offers a favorable legal environment for arbitration, with its Arbitration and Mediation Law (Decree No. 49/1996) aligning with international standards, including the UNCITRAL Model Law. Arbitration in El Salvador is an efficient and flexible alternative to litigation for both domestic and international disputes. The country’s commitment to the New York Convention and its developed infrastructure for arbitration make it an attractive venue for resolving commercial disputes. While the use of arbitration is growing, challenges such as limited awareness and occasional judicial intervention remain. Nonetheless, El Salvador continues to be an important arbitration hub in Central America.

0 comments