Arbitration Law in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone has a developing framework for arbitration that is influenced by international standards such as the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention. The country’s legal framework for arbitration aims to provide an effective and impartial means of dispute resolution, especially for both domestic and international commercial disputes. Below is an overview of the Arbitration Law in Sierra Leone:
1. Legal Framework
- Arbitration Act, 1965: The primary legal framework for arbitration in Sierra Leone is the Arbitration Act of 1965. The Act is modeled on the English Arbitration Act of 1950 and has undergone some amendments to bring it in line with more contemporary international arbitration practices.
- UNCITRAL Model Law: Sierra Leone’s arbitration framework is influenced by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. While the Arbitration Act, 1965 is not fully aligned with the UNCITRAL Model Law, it provides a relatively modern framework for arbitration in the country.
- New York Convention: Sierra Leone is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which allows for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards made in other countries that are also parties to the Convention.
2. Arbitration Agreement
- Written Agreement: The Arbitration Act requires that the arbitration agreement must be in writing. This can be an arbitration clause within a contract or a separate arbitration agreement.
- Scope: The arbitration agreement must specify the disputes that are subject to arbitration. If the agreement is unclear, it could be subject to challenge, and the court may intervene to determine whether arbitration is appropriate.
- Enforceability: Arbitration agreements are generally enforceable in Sierra Leone, but they may be challenged if the subject matter is not arbitrable under the law or if the agreement itself is invalid.
3. Arbitral Tribunal
- Number of Arbitrators: The parties are free to agree on the number of arbitrators, which is typically one or three. If no agreement is made, the default rule is a single arbitrator unless the parties agree otherwise.
- Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties are allowed to appoint their own arbitrators. If they fail to do so, the court has the authority to appoint arbitrators. For example, in a three-arbitrator panel, the court may appoint the presiding arbitrator.
- Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators must be independent and impartial. They must disclose any potential conflict of interest before being appointed. If any of the parties feel the arbitrator is biased or compromised, they can challenge the appointment.
- Qualifications of Arbitrators: While the Arbitration Act does not explicitly specify the qualifications of arbitrators, they are generally expected to have expertise in the subject matter of the dispute.
4. Arbitration Procedure
- Party Autonomy: In Sierra Leone, parties have the freedom to determine the rules of procedure for arbitration. They may choose to adopt the rules of an established institution (such as the ICC or LCIA) or agree to ad hoc arbitration rules. If no procedural rules are agreed upon, the Arbitration Act provides default procedural rules.
- Default Rules: If the parties do not agree on specific procedures, the Arbitration Act provides a basic framework, including guidelines on the appointment of arbitrators, conduct of hearings, and the issuance of awards.
- Language: The parties are free to agree on the language to be used in the arbitration. In the absence of such an agreement, the arbitral tribunal will decide the language based on the circumstances of the case.
- Location of Arbitration: The seat of the arbitration can be chosen by the parties, and it can be located in Sierra Leone or elsewhere, based on their agreement. The choice of seat determines the jurisdiction of the courts that will have authority over the arbitration.
5. Arbitral Awards
- Binding Nature: Once issued, the arbitral award is final and binding on the parties. The prevailing party may apply to the court to enforce the award if the losing party refuses to comply with the decision.
- Form of Award: The arbitral award must be issued in writing and signed by the arbitrators. It must provide the reasoning behind the decision unless the parties have agreed to a summary award or have waived the reasoning.
- Remedies: The arbitral tribunal can grant a range of remedies, including monetary damages, specific performance, and injunctive relief, depending on the nature of the dispute.
6. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- Domestic Arbitral Awards: Arbitral awards made within Sierra Leone are recognized and enforced by the Sierra Leone courts. If a party fails to comply with the award, the prevailing party can apply to the court for enforcement.
- Foreign Arbitral Awards: As a member of the New York Convention, Sierra Leone is obligated to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards made in other member countries of the Convention, subject to certain conditions.
- Grounds for Refusal: Foreign arbitral awards may be refused recognition or enforcement in Sierra Leone on the following grounds:
- If the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law of the country where the award was made.
- If the award is contrary to public policy in Sierra Leone.
- If the party against whom the award was made was not properly notified of the arbitration proceedings, thus violating their right to due process.
- If the arbitral tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.
7. Judicial Review and Setting Aside of Awards
- Limited Judicial Review: Sierra Leone’s courts have limited jurisdiction to review arbitral awards. Courts cannot examine the merits of the award but may only set it aside under specific conditions:
- The arbitration agreement was invalid.
- The arbitral tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.
- There were serious procedural irregularities, such as a violation of due process.
- The award is contrary to public policy in Sierra Leone.
- Setting Aside Procedure: A party wishing to set aside an arbitral award must apply to the Sierra Leone court within three months from the date the award was received by the party seeking to set it aside.
8. Institutional vs. Ad Hoc Arbitration
- Institutional Arbitration: Sierra Leone allows for institutional arbitration, and parties may choose to have their dispute resolved through institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), or others.
- Ad Hoc Arbitration: In ad hoc arbitration, the parties are free to agree on the rules of procedure, including the selection of arbitrators and the conduct of hearings. The Arbitration Act provides a basic framework for managing such arbitrations, but the responsibility lies with the parties to handle the process.
9. International Arbitration
- International Commercial Arbitration: Sierra Leone has become increasingly open to international arbitration, especially with its commitment to the New York Convention. This makes the country a viable jurisdiction for resolving international disputes, particularly those involving commercial matters.
- Recognition of Foreign Awards: As a member of the New York Convention, Sierra Leone upholds the principle of recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards made in other jurisdictions that are also parties to the Convention.
10. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
- While Sierra Leone’s arbitration framework is relatively underdeveloped compared to some other jurisdictions, the country is taking steps to strengthen its role as an arbitration hub, particularly for disputes involving parties in West Africa and other parts of Africa.
- The government has expressed interest in improving the legal environment for arbitration by potentially updating the Arbitration Act to more closely align with the UNCITRAL Model Law and other modern international arbitration standards.
Conclusion
Sierra Leone’s Arbitration Act of 1965 provides a solid foundation for both domestic and international arbitration, especially with its adherence to the New York Convention. While the legal framework is based on older models, the country is gradually improving its arbitration infrastructure and positioning itself as a potential venue for international dispute resolution. However, further updates to the law and stronger institutional support could enhance Sierra Leone’s attractiveness as an arbitration hub in Africa.
RELATED Blog
0 comments