Arbitration Law in Hungary
Arbitration Law in Hungary
Hungary has a well-established legal framework for arbitration, making it an attractive jurisdiction for resolving both domestic and international disputes. The country is committed to upholding international arbitration standards and has a reputation for offering a neutral and efficient arbitration environment.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration
The primary legal framework for arbitration in Hungary is the Arbitration Act (Act LX of 2002), which is in line with international standards, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Hungary also adheres to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958).
Arbitration Act (Act LX of 2002): This act governs both domestic and international arbitration in Hungary. It provides detailed regulations on the arbitration process, including the appointment of arbitrators, jurisdiction, the powers of arbitrators, and the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. The act was amended in 2017 to further align with international best practices.
UNCITRAL Model Law: Hungary's arbitration law is largely based on the UNCITRAL Model Law, which ensures that its arbitration process follows a standardized and internationally recognized framework.
New York Convention: As a signatory to the New York Convention, Hungary is committed to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, allowing international awards to be enforced in Hungary and Hungarian awards to be enforced abroad.
2. Arbitration Agreement
Form and Requirements: An arbitration agreement in Hungary must be in writing. This can include written contracts, correspondence, or even electronic communications, provided that the intention to arbitrate is clear.
Enforceability: Arbitration agreements are generally enforceable in Hungary, and if a party refuses to arbitrate, the other party may request the court to compel arbitration. The Hungarian courts are supportive of arbitration agreements and generally do not interfere in matters where an agreement to arbitrate exists.
Scope: Arbitration agreements in Hungary can cover a broad range of civil disputes, particularly commercial and contractual disputes. Certain matters, like family law and criminal law issues, are not subject to arbitration.
3. Appointment of Arbitrators
Number of Arbitrators: The parties are free to determine the number of arbitrators. If the parties cannot agree, the default number is typically three arbitrators.
Qualification of Arbitrators: Arbitrators in Hungary must be independent and impartial. The parties are free to agree on the qualifications and expertise required of the arbitrators, depending on the nature of the dispute.
Appointment Process: If the parties cannot agree on the appointment of an arbitrator, the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (HCCI) or other appointed institutions can step in and appoint an arbitrator. The court can also intervene if the parties fail to appoint an arbitrator.
4. Arbitration Procedure
Flexibility: Hungary's arbitration law is designed to be flexible, allowing the parties to agree on the rules of the arbitration and the procedural steps. If the parties cannot agree, the arbitrators have the authority to set the procedures for the arbitration process.
Seat of Arbitration: The seat of the arbitration can be Hungary or any other location chosen by the parties. If no location is specified, it is usually determined by the arbitrators.
Language: The language of arbitration is decided by the parties. If the parties do not agree, the arbitrators will decide the language based on the circumstances of the case.
Interim Measures: Arbitrators in Hungary have the authority to grant interim relief to protect the rights of the parties during the arbitration process. This can include orders to preserve evidence, freeze assets, or prevent certain actions.
5. Role of Courts in Arbitration
Judicial Support: Hungarian courts are generally supportive of arbitration. They assist with the appointment of arbitrators, the granting of interim relief, and enforcing arbitration agreements.
Compelling Arbitration: If a party refuses to arbitrate, the other party can request the court to compel the dispute to proceed to arbitration. The court will generally respect the arbitration agreement unless there are reasons to invalidate it.
Interim Relief: The courts have the power to grant interim relief in support of arbitration proceedings, such as injunctions, preservation of assets, or measures to secure evidence.
Setting Aside an Award: Hungarian courts can set aside an arbitral award only in very limited circumstances, such as:
- Lack of Jurisdiction: If the arbitral tribunal did not have jurisdiction over the dispute.
- Procedural Irregularities: If there were serious violations of due process or the rules of natural justice.
- Public Policy: If the award violates Hungary's public policy or fundamental principles of justice.
6. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Domestic Awards: An arbitral award made in Hungary is enforceable within the country without the need for recognition proceedings. The award can be directly executed through the Hungarian courts.
Foreign Awards: Hungary is a signatory to the New York Convention and enforces foreign arbitral awards under its provisions. If a foreign award is sought to be enforced in Hungary, the party requesting enforcement must apply to the Hungarian court, and the court will generally enforce the award unless there are reasons under the Convention to refuse it (e.g., if it is contrary to public policy).
7. Confidentiality
Arbitration proceedings in Hungary are typically confidential. The parties and the arbitrators are required to maintain confidentiality, and the award is generally not disclosed unless the parties agree to do so or the court orders the disclosure.
8. Arbitration Institutions
Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (HCCI): The HCCI is one of the leading arbitration institutions in Hungary. It administers arbitrations, provides lists of qualified arbitrators, and offers rules and guidelines for conducting arbitration.
Other Institutions: Hungary also participates in international arbitration institutions, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Vienna International Arbitral Centre (VIAC), and London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), which parties may choose if they are conducting arbitration in Hungary.
9. Challenges and Opportunities
Challenges: While Hungary has a strong legal framework for arbitration, challenges include the need for more awareness and education about the arbitration process among businesses, especially in sectors outside of international trade. Another challenge could be ensuring consistent interpretation of arbitration laws across courts.
Opportunities: Hungary has a growing reputation as a favorable arbitration venue in Central and Eastern Europe. The pro-arbitration environment, neutrality, and efficient court system make it an attractive option for international dispute resolution, especially for disputes involving parties from neighboring regions.
10. Conclusion
Hungary offers a modern and comprehensive legal framework for arbitration that is in line with international best practices, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention. The Arbitration Act (2002) provides flexibility and clarity, ensuring that both domestic and international parties can rely on the arbitration process to resolve disputes effectively. The country is known for its supportive judicial system, impartiality, and efficient arbitration procedures. As Hungary continues to enhance its arbitration infrastructure, it is increasingly seen as a key arbitration hub in Central Europe.
RELATED Blog
0 comments