Arbitration Law in Guinea-Bissau
Arbitration Law in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau, a country located in West Africa, has adopted a legal framework that recognizes and regulates arbitration as a method for dispute resolution. However, the country's arbitration law is not as developed or extensive as in some other jurisdictions, and there are still limitations related to infrastructure and enforcement mechanisms. Despite these challenges, Guinea-Bissau has made efforts to align with international standards.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau's legal framework governing arbitration is mainly influenced by international conventions and regional frameworks. The country is a member of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), and the arbitration laws in Guinea-Bissau are partially informed by regional guidelines.
Arbitration Law: The main legislative framework is the Arbitration Law that was adopted to regulate both domestic and international arbitration. While specific details of the law may be sparse, it aligns with broader West African regional practices for arbitration.
UNCITRAL Model Law: Guinea-Bissau's arbitration framework is influenced by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, which is designed to harmonize arbitration rules internationally. This makes Guinea-Bissau's arbitration system somewhat compatible with global standards, but there may be gaps in certain areas.
New York Convention (1958): Guinea-Bissau is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. This enables the enforcement of arbitral awards issued in other countries that are also parties to the convention, adding to the credibility of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism.
2. Arbitration Agreement
Written Form: Arbitration agreements in Guinea-Bissau must be written. This can take the form of a separate arbitration agreement or an arbitration clause within a broader contract.
Enforceability: Once agreed to by the parties, arbitration agreements are enforceable. If one party refuses to arbitrate, the other party may approach the court to compel arbitration.
Scope: Arbitration agreements can cover various disputes, including commercial, contractual, and trade-related issues. They can be used in a wide range of industries and for resolving both domestic and international disputes.
3. Appointment of Arbitrators
Number of Arbitrators: The parties involved in an arbitration case in Guinea-Bissau have the freedom to choose the number of arbitrators, typically one or three. If the parties cannot agree on the number or the selection of arbitrators, the courts may intervene to appoint them.
Selection Process: In the absence of a pre-agreed process, the parties or arbitrators may jointly decide on the appointment of arbitrators. Typically, arbitrators should be independent and impartial.
Qualifications: Arbitrators are expected to have appropriate legal and professional qualifications. The legal framework emphasizes neutrality and competence in resolving disputes.
4. Arbitration Procedure
Flexibility: Arbitration in Guinea-Bissau is flexible. The parties are free to determine many procedural aspects of the arbitration, such as the place of arbitration, the language of proceedings, and the rules to govern the arbitration (e.g., UNCITRAL or ICC rules).
Procedure in the Absence of Agreement: If the parties do not agree on the procedural aspects, the arbitrators themselves will have the authority to set the procedures.
Interim Measures: Arbitrators in Guinea-Bissau can order interim measures to preserve the status quo, protect evidence, or prevent harm before the final award is issued.
5. Role of Courts in Arbitration
Supportive Role: In general, courts in Guinea-Bissau play a supportive role in arbitration. They are involved in limited circumstances such as:
- Enforcing arbitration agreements
- Appointing arbitrators if the parties cannot agree on one
- Setting aside or confirming arbitral awards on specific grounds, such as lack of jurisdiction, failure to observe due process, or violation of public policy.
Compelling Arbitration: If one party refuses to honor an arbitration agreement, the other party may apply to the court to compel the reluctant party to arbitrate the dispute.
6. Arbitration Institutions
Guinea-Bissau does not currently have a prominent national arbitration institution that is widely used for domestic arbitration. Most international arbitrations that take place in Guinea-Bissau are likely to be administered by global arbitration bodies.
- International Arbitration Institutions: In practice, parties in Guinea-Bissau are more likely to use international arbitration institutions such as:
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
These institutions provide the rules and frameworks for arbitration, and their involvement is common in international arbitration cases.
7. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
New York Convention: Since Guinea-Bissau is a party to the New York Convention, arbitral awards rendered in other jurisdictions that are also signatories to the Convention can be enforced in Guinea-Bissau, making international arbitration a practical option.
Recognition of Foreign Awards: Guinea-Bissau is committed to recognizing and enforcing arbitral awards from other countries in accordance with the New York Convention, unless there are compelling reasons for refusal based on public policy or procedural deficiencies.
Domestic Awards: Domestic arbitral awards are also enforceable in Guinea-Bissau, although there may be challenges related to the efficiency and capacity of the local courts to handle enforcement proceedings.
8. Confidentiality
Arbitration proceedings in Guinea-Bissau are generally confidential, ensuring that sensitive business or trade secrets are protected. However, confidentiality can be waived if both parties agree to disclose details, or if required for enforcement purposes.
9. Challenges and Opportunities
Limited Infrastructure: Guinea-Bissau faces challenges in terms of legal infrastructure and resources for arbitration. There is no well-established, local arbitration institution, and the courts may lack sufficient experience in handling complex arbitration matters.
Capacity Building: While the country is making progress, there is a need for more training and education in the legal community regarding international arbitration standards.
Growing Interest: As the country continues to engage in regional trade and foreign investment, there is a growing interest in using arbitration to resolve disputes more efficiently. International businesses may prefer arbitration for its neutrality, confidentiality, and speed.
10. Conclusion
Arbitration in Guinea-Bissau is governed by a legal framework that allows for both domestic and international arbitration. While the country has made some progress in aligning its practices with international norms, there are still challenges related to infrastructure and expertise in handling arbitration matters.
The New York Convention and the influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law make Guinea-Bissau an attractive location for international dispute resolution, especially in the West African region. However, parties involved in arbitration in Guinea-Bissau may often turn to established international arbitration institutions for more complex or high-value disputes.
With continued development in the legal framework and infrastructure, Guinea-Bissau has the potential to become a more prominent venue for arbitration in the region.
RELATED Blog
0 comments