Difference Between Set-Off and Counterclaim

Difference Between Set-Off and Counterclaim

1. Definition

TermExplanation
Set-OffA legal defense where the defendant admits the plaintiff’s claim but reduces the amount claimed by asserting a claim the defendant has against the plaintiff arising from the same transaction or contract.
CounterclaimA claim made by the defendant against the plaintiff which arises from a different transaction or cause of action and seeks relief or damages beyond just reducing the plaintiff’s claim. It is a separate cause of action.

2. Legal Basis

Both concepts are governed under Order 8 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908.

Set-off is a mode of defense; it extinguishes or reduces the plaintiff’s claim.

Counterclaim is a cross-suit or an independent claim arising from a different cause.

3. Key Differences

AspectSet-OffCounterclaim
Nature of claimArises out of the same transaction or contract as the plaintiff’s claim.Arises out of a different transaction or cause of action.
Effect on SuitOperates to reduce or extinguish the plaintiff’s claim only.Seeks affirmative relief or damages against plaintiff, can exceed plaintiff’s claim.
Independent SuitNo; it cannot be treated as a separate suit.Yes; it is like a cross-suit and can be independent.
PurposeTo adjust mutual debts arising from the same transaction.To claim damages or relief for a separate cause related to the plaintiff.
Scope of ReliefLimited to reducing or nullifying the plaintiff’s claim.Can claim additional damages or relief beyond plaintiff’s claim.
Burden of ProofDefendant must prove the right to set-off.Defendant must prove the separate claim fully.
PleadingMust be specifically pleaded as a set-off.Pleaded as a counterclaim under Order 8 Rule 6(2).
Court’s JurisdictionCourt decides the net amount after adjustment.Court decides both claims independently.

4. Illustration

Set-Off:
If A sues B for ₹1,00,000 for sale of goods, and B also owes A ₹30,000 from the same contract, B can claim set-off for ₹30,000 to reduce the payable amount.

Counterclaim:
If A sues B for ₹1,00,000 for goods supplied, but B claims damages for breach of a different contract (e.g., service contract), B can file a counterclaim for those damages.

5. Relevant Case Law

Case NamePrinciple
K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1956 AIR 576)Set-off arises from the same transaction; counterclaim arises from a different transaction.
State Bank of India v. M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. (AIR 1985 SC 1862)Clarified difference between set-off and counterclaim under Order 8 Rule 6 CPC.
Union of India v. East Coast Sporting Union (1968 AIR 178)Counterclaim can be independent claim and can be for damages beyond plaintiff’s claim.
Industrial Finance Corporation Ltd. v. P. Krishnamurthy (AIR 1973 SC 297)Defendant can plead both set-off and counterclaim; set-off adjusts the claim, counterclaim is separate.
Pannalal Binjraj v. State of Maharashtra (1969 AIR 128)Emphasized the necessity to distinguish between the two for proper pleading and trial.

6. Practical Implications

Set-Off saves time and expense as it is resolved within the same suit and transaction.

Counterclaim allows a defendant to assert additional claims and seek separate relief.

Failure to plead a set-off or counterclaim may result in waiver of those rights.

Courts examine the nature of transactions carefully to categorize the claim properly.

7. Summary Table

FeatureSet-OffCounterclaim
TransactionSame transaction as plaintiff’s claimDifferent transaction or cause of action
ReliefReduces or extinguishes plaintiff’s claimIndependent relief or damages
SuitSame suitCross-suit within the same proceeding
Pleading RequirementSpecific mention as set-offPleaded under counterclaim rules
EffectAdjusts claimsIndependent decision on claims

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments