Difference Between Set-Off and Counterclaim
Difference Between Set-Off and Counterclaim
1. Definition
Term | Explanation |
---|---|
Set-Off | A legal defense where the defendant admits the plaintiff’s claim but reduces the amount claimed by asserting a claim the defendant has against the plaintiff arising from the same transaction or contract. |
Counterclaim | A claim made by the defendant against the plaintiff which arises from a different transaction or cause of action and seeks relief or damages beyond just reducing the plaintiff’s claim. It is a separate cause of action. |
2. Legal Basis
Both concepts are governed under Order 8 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908.
Set-off is a mode of defense; it extinguishes or reduces the plaintiff’s claim.
Counterclaim is a cross-suit or an independent claim arising from a different cause.
3. Key Differences
Aspect | Set-Off | Counterclaim |
---|---|---|
Nature of claim | Arises out of the same transaction or contract as the plaintiff’s claim. | Arises out of a different transaction or cause of action. |
Effect on Suit | Operates to reduce or extinguish the plaintiff’s claim only. | Seeks affirmative relief or damages against plaintiff, can exceed plaintiff’s claim. |
Independent Suit | No; it cannot be treated as a separate suit. | Yes; it is like a cross-suit and can be independent. |
Purpose | To adjust mutual debts arising from the same transaction. | To claim damages or relief for a separate cause related to the plaintiff. |
Scope of Relief | Limited to reducing or nullifying the plaintiff’s claim. | Can claim additional damages or relief beyond plaintiff’s claim. |
Burden of Proof | Defendant must prove the right to set-off. | Defendant must prove the separate claim fully. |
Pleading | Must be specifically pleaded as a set-off. | Pleaded as a counterclaim under Order 8 Rule 6(2). |
Court’s Jurisdiction | Court decides the net amount after adjustment. | Court decides both claims independently. |
4. Illustration
Set-Off:
If A sues B for ₹1,00,000 for sale of goods, and B also owes A ₹30,000 from the same contract, B can claim set-off for ₹30,000 to reduce the payable amount.
Counterclaim:
If A sues B for ₹1,00,000 for goods supplied, but B claims damages for breach of a different contract (e.g., service contract), B can file a counterclaim for those damages.
5. Relevant Case Law
Case Name | Principle |
---|---|
K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1956 AIR 576) | Set-off arises from the same transaction; counterclaim arises from a different transaction. |
State Bank of India v. M/s Patel Engineering Ltd. (AIR 1985 SC 1862) | Clarified difference between set-off and counterclaim under Order 8 Rule 6 CPC. |
Union of India v. East Coast Sporting Union (1968 AIR 178) | Counterclaim can be independent claim and can be for damages beyond plaintiff’s claim. |
Industrial Finance Corporation Ltd. v. P. Krishnamurthy (AIR 1973 SC 297) | Defendant can plead both set-off and counterclaim; set-off adjusts the claim, counterclaim is separate. |
Pannalal Binjraj v. State of Maharashtra (1969 AIR 128) | Emphasized the necessity to distinguish between the two for proper pleading and trial. |
6. Practical Implications
Set-Off saves time and expense as it is resolved within the same suit and transaction.
Counterclaim allows a defendant to assert additional claims and seek separate relief.
Failure to plead a set-off or counterclaim may result in waiver of those rights.
Courts examine the nature of transactions carefully to categorize the claim properly.
7. Summary Table
Feature | Set-Off | Counterclaim |
---|---|---|
Transaction | Same transaction as plaintiff’s claim | Different transaction or cause of action |
Relief | Reduces or extinguishes plaintiff’s claim | Independent relief or damages |
Suit | Same suit | Cross-suit within the same proceeding |
Pleading Requirement | Specific mention as set-off | Pleaded under counterclaim rules |
Effect | Adjusts claims | Independent decision on claims |
0 comments