Modes of Filing a Counterclaim
In India, the modes of filing a counterclaim are governed primarily by Order VIII, Rules 6A to 6G of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). These provisions were introduced by the Amendment Act of 1976 to avoid multiplicity of suits and allow for comprehensive adjudication of disputes between the same parties within a single proceeding.
Here are the key modes and aspects related to filing a counterclaim:
1. Filing Along with the Written Statement (Order VIII, Rule 1 read with Rule 6A)
This is the most common and preferred mode of filing a counterclaim.
When: The defendant should ideally include the counterclaim in their written statement of defense filed in response to the plaintiff's suit.
Time Limit: Rule 6A(1) specifies that a counterclaim can be set up in respect of a cause of action accruing to the defendant against the plaintiff either before or after the filing of the suit, but before the defendant has delivered his defense (written statement) or before the time fixed for delivering his defense has expired.
Procedure:
The counterclaim should be clearly stated as such in the written statement.
It must be pleaded with the same particulars as a plaint (e.g., details of the cause of action, relief sought, valuation for court fees and jurisdiction).
Proper court fees must be paid on the counterclaim, as it is treated as a separate cross-suit.
It must be within the pecuniary limits of the court's jurisdiction.
2. By Amending the Written Statement (with the leave of the Court) (Order VI, Rule 17 read with Order VIII, Rule 6A)
While the ideal time is with the original written statement, courts do have discretion to allow a counterclaim to be filed later by way of an amendment to the written statement.
When: If the defendant was unable to file the counterclaim with the original written statement (e.g., the cause of action accrued later, or they genuinely overlooked it), they can seek the court's permission to amend their written statement to include the counterclaim.
Court's Discretion: The court exercises its discretion based on several factors, including:
Reason for Delay: The defendant must provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the counterclaim.
Prejudice to Plaintiff: Whether allowing the belated counterclaim would cause undue prejudice to the plaintiff.
Multiplicity of Proceedings: The court often leans towards allowing it if it helps avoid a fresh, separate suit, thereby saving judicial time and resources.
Stage of Proceedings: The Supreme Court in various judgments (e.g., Ashok Kumar Kalra v. Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri, 2019) has clarified that a counterclaim can be permitted even after the written statement has been filed, but generally not after the issues have been framed and the trial has substantially commenced. However, in exceptional circumstances, and to prevent multiplicity of proceedings, it might be allowed even after issues are framed but before the recording of evidence has begun. It is almost never allowed once evidence has started.
Formal Application: The defendant needs to file a formal application (under Order VI, Rule 17 CPC) seeking leave of the court to amend their written statement and introduce the counterclaim.
3. In a Subsequent Pleading (with the leave of the Court) (Order VIII, Rule 9 read with Rule 6A)
Order VIII, Rule 9 deals with "subsequent pleadings" which are generally not allowed after the written statement, except by the leave of the Court or by way of defence to set-off or counterclaim. This rule provides another potential avenue, though less common for initial filing of a counterclaim.
When: If the cause of action for the counterclaim arises after the written statement has been filed, the defendant might seek to file it as a "subsequent pleading."
Court's Leave: Similar to amendment, this requires the express leave of the court, which will again consider the stage of the suit, the reasons for delay, and the overall interest of justice.
Important Considerations for Filing a Counterclaim:
Cause of Action: The cause of action for the counterclaim must exist on the date the counterclaim is filed. It can be a cause of action that arose before the plaintiff's suit, or even after the plaintiff's suit was filed, but before the defendant's written statement was or could have been filed.
Pecuniary and Territorial Jurisdiction: The counterclaim must fall within the pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction of the court where the original suit is pending.Limitation: The counterclaim must not be barred by the law of limitation. The period of limitation for a counterclaim is generally reckoned from the date the cause of action for the counterclaim arose.
Treatment as Plaint: Once filed, the counterclaim is treated as a plaint (a cross-suit), and the plaintiff in the original suit is entitled to file a written statement in reply to the counterclaim.
Independent Survival: The counterclaim can proceed independently even if the plaintiff's original suit is stayed, discontinued, withdrawn, or dismissed.
Understanding these modes and the associated conditions is crucial for a defendant who wishes to assert their rights against the plaintiff within the same ongoing litigation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments