Unless Self-Administered, No Vaccination Can Cure Evil Of Virus Of Commercial Mindedness Of Educational... explaain in detail with summary table
🔎 Detailed Explanation
“Unless Self-Administered, No Vaccination Can Cure Evil Of Virus Of Commercial Mindedness Of Educational…”
This is a metaphorical critique of commercialization of education.
Virus of Commercial Mindedness
Education has increasingly become a profit-oriented business.
Institutions charge exorbitant fees, run donation-based admissions, and focus more on infrastructure and branding than actual learning.
Like a virus, this mindset spreads across schools, colleges, and coaching centres, infecting the purity of education.
Vaccination (External Measures)
Symbolizes government regulations, statutory controls, judicial pronouncements, and public criticism.
These measures can impose restrictions on profiteering, but they cannot eliminate commercialization entirely.
Example: Cap on fee hikes by private schools often leads to hidden charges or “voluntary contributions.”
Unless Self-Administered (Internal Cure)
True reform lies in self-regulation.
Institutions must adopt ethical codes, teachers must put service above salary, and parents must resist evaluating schools purely on luxury or status.
Without such voluntary acceptance of responsibility, no external law or judgment can succeed.
Core Meaning
Education is not a commodity, but a social good and constitutional obligation.
Unless stakeholders administer the moral vaccine themselves, commercialization will persist despite judicial and government interventions.
⚖️ Case Law Analysis
Indian courts have repeatedly recognized commercialization of education as “evil” or “malpractice.”
Unnikrishnan J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993)
The Supreme Court held that right to education is part of the Right to Life under Article 21.
It struck down the capitation fee system, calling commercialization of education unconstitutional.
Message: External prohibition helps, but real change requires institutions to embrace education as a mission, not business.
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002)
The Court allowed autonomy to private institutions but stressed that “education is essentially charitable in nature”.
It warned against profiteering, stating reasonable surplus for growth is fine, but commercial exploitation is unconstitutional.
Reflection: Autonomy is useful, but without self-imposed ethical discipline, autonomy can become a cover for commercialization.
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra (2005)
Reiterated that education cannot be treated as trade or commerce under Article 19(1)(g).
Prohibited profiteering and capitation fees in admissions.
Again, the Court could only impose restrictions, but the true cure lies in institutional ethics.
Modern Dental College v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2016)
The Court upheld state regulation of admissions and fees to curb commercialization.
It emphasized that the aim of education is not profit but public welfare.
Despite strong words, the Court admitted that regulation is preventive, not a permanent cure.
📊 Summary Table
| Phrase / Symbol | Explanation | Judicial Support |
|---|---|---|
| Virus of Commercial Mindedness | Profit-driven approach in education corrupting its true purpose | Courts recognize “commercialization” as unconstitutional (Unnikrishnan, T.M.A. Pai) |
| Vaccination (External Measures) | Govt. rules, fee caps, court judgments | Judicial interventions restrict but cannot fully eradicate (Modern Dental College) |
| No Cure Unless Self-Administered | Real reform through ethics, self-regulation by institutions, teachers, parents | Courts stress “education is charitable, not business” (P.A. Inamdar) |
| Core Message | Commercialization can’t be solved only by external law; requires voluntary acceptance of moral responsibility | Consistent judicial philosophy: ban profiteering but urge ethical conduct |
✅ Final Takeaway
The statement means that no external law, policy, or judgment can permanently cure commercialization of education. Courts (through cases like Unnikrishnan, T.M.A. Pai, Inamdar, and Modern Dental College) have recognized commercialization as unconstitutional, but they also hint that the real solution lies in self-regulation, ethics, and voluntary action by educational stakeholders.
RELATED Blog
0 comments