Order 12 Rule 8 CPC
Order 12 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 deals with the notice to produce documents in a civil suit. This rule forms part of the broader provisions under Order XII, which relates to "Admissions".
⚖️ Order 12 Rule 8 CPC – Text and Explanation
Text of Order 12 Rule 8 CPC:
"Notice to produce documents—Notice to produce documents shall be in Form No. 7 in Appendix C, and shall be served in the same manner as a summons. If the party served omits to produce the document and no satisfactory excuse is offered, he shall not afterwards be at liberty to put any such document in evidence on his behalf without the leave of the Court."
✅ Key Elements of Order 12 Rule 8 CPC
Purpose:
To compel the opposite party to produce documents that are in their possession or power and are relevant to the suit.
Format:
The notice must be in Form No. 7 of Appendix C of the CPC.
It should clearly specify what documents are required.
Mode of Service:
It must be served like a summons, i.e., via the process prescribed for serving legal notices in CPC.
Consequence of Non-Compliance:
If the party fails to produce the document and offers no valid excuse, they cannot later rely on or introduce that document in evidence without the court's permission.
Discretion of Court:
The court may still allow the party to produce the document later, but only with leave (permission) of the court, and usually only if justified.
🧠 Legal Interpretation
This rule is a procedural safeguard designed to prevent surprise tactics in litigation, like withholding documents until a late stage.
It promotes transparency and fairness by ensuring that both parties are aware of all relevant documents before trial.
📚 Important Case Laws on Order 12 Rule 8 CPC
1. State of Rajasthan v. Khemraj (AIR 2000 SC 1759)
Held:
The Supreme Court emphasized that when a party is served with a notice to produce documents and fails to comply without justification, they lose the right to later rely on those documents unless permitted by the court. This ensures that litigation proceeds fairly and that parties cannot ambush each other with late evidence.
2. M.L. Sethi v. R.P. Kapur (AIR 1972 SC 2379)
Relevance:
Though not directly on Rule 8, the case touches upon production of documents and the inherent powers of the court under Section 151 CPC. It reinforces that rules of procedure must aid, not obstruct, justice. Courts can exercise discretion to allow a document to be produced later in the interest of justice.
3. Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Ashok Vishnu Kate (1995) 6 SCC 326
Held:
Non-compliance with procedural rules like Order 12 Rule 8 should not always result in automatic exclusion. The court must consider whether the omission was deliberate or inadvertent, and whether allowing the document would prejudice the other party.
📝 Practical Usage
In practice, lawyers issue such a notice to get documents like contracts, letters, invoices, etc., which the other party holds.
If the documents are not produced, the party issuing the notice may seek a direction from the court or object to any later attempt to use those documents.
⚠️ Points to Remember
Simply serving a notice does not compel production; if not produced, the party must move court for appropriate orders (e.g., under Order 11 or Section 30 CPC).
This rule does not apply to third parties—only to the opposing party in the suit.
🧾 Conclusion
Order 12 Rule 8 CPC is a useful procedural tool for ensuring documentary transparency in civil litigation. It helps prevent trial by ambush and protects the interests of justice by setting out a formal method for requesting and enforcing production of relevant documents. However, the court retains discretion to allow documents to be introduced even after non-compliance, if justice demands.
RELATED Blog
0 comments