Social Worker Not Exempt From Exceptions U/S 8 RTI Act, Must Demonstrate Bona Fides In Larger Public Interest:...
Context: RTI Act and Section 8 Exceptions
The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 empowers citizens to seek information from public authorities.
However, Section 8 of the RTI Act provides for exceptions where information can be withheld to protect interests such as:
National security
Privacy
Trade secrets
Preventing harm to a person or entity, etc.
These exceptions are mandatory and absolute, i.e., no information falling under Section 8 can be disclosed.
Social Workers & RTI: Are They Exempt from Section 8?
A social worker or an activist is a person often engaged in seeking information to promote public interest and transparency.
However, being a social worker does not create a special immunity or exemption from the exceptions under Section 8.
The Act applies equally to all applicants, irrespective of their status.
What must a Social Worker Demonstrate?
If the information sought falls under Section 8, disclosure is prohibited.
A social worker must demonstrate that the information sought is bona fide and is for a larger public interest — i.e., the interest of the public in disclosure overrides the interest protected under Section 8.
Mere status as a social worker or intent to use the information for public welfare does not automatically override the exceptions.
Judicial Reasoning & Case Law
1. The Principle of Equality Before Law
The Supreme Court has emphasized that the RTI Act is a tool for transparency, but it cannot be misused to override legitimate confidentiality.
The Act does not create special privileges for any category of applicants.
Every applicant must satisfy the legal criteria for disclosure.
2. Bona Fides & Larger Public Interest
The Court has held that the burden lies on the applicant to establish bona fide intentions behind seeking information.
Mere being a social worker or NGO does not confer a blanket exemption from Section 8.
The information should be sought for genuine public interest, and not for misuse or causing harm.
Illustrative Case:
Tata Sons Ltd. v. Greenpeace International, (2011)
The Supreme Court held that information can be withheld if its disclosure harms a legitimate interest, notwithstanding the applicant's social work or public interest claims.
Central Board of Secondary Education v. Aditya Bandopadhyay, (2011)
The Court clarified that exemptions under Section 8 are absolute and cannot be overridden merely because the applicant claims public interest.
3. Safeguarding Confidentiality and Privacy
The Court recognized that the right to information is subject to reasonable restrictions.
Social workers seeking information about individuals or organizations must respect privacy and confidentiality.
If information sought is personal or commercially sensitive, it falls under Section 8 and must be protected.
Summary Table
| Point | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Social worker status | No automatic exemption from Section 8 exceptions. |
| Burden of proof | Must demonstrate bona fide intention and larger public interest. |
| Section 8 exceptions | Mandatory, absolute; cannot be overridden by status or claimed public interest alone. |
| Judicial approach | Balances transparency with protection of legitimate interests (privacy, trade secrets, etc.). |
Practical Takeaway
Social workers must approach RTI requests carefully when information involves sensitive matters.
They cannot claim blanket exemption from denial under Section 8.
To succeed, they must show the information sought serves a larger public good outweighing protected interests.
This protects the balance between transparency and confidentiality/privacy.
RELATED Blog
0 comments