Biggest Slap On The Face Of Constitution And Its Key Architect
1. Context
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, widely regarded as the principal architect of the Indian Constitution, envisioned India as a democratic, just, and egalitarian society. The Constitution was designed to guarantee:
Equality before law (Article 14)
Prohibition of discrimination based on caste, religion, or gender (Article 15)
Social justice for marginalized communities, particularly Dalits and backward classes
Fundamental rights, including the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21)
Dr. Ambedkar’s dream was to create a society where no one would be oppressed or discriminated against due to birth or social status.
2. The Slap on the Face of the Constitution
Despite the lofty ideals, there have been several instances in India’s history where actions by the State, institutions, or individuals have contradicted the spirit of the Constitution, effectively being a “slap” on Dr. Ambedkar’s vision. Some key aspects include:
Caste-Based Atrocities:
Even after constitutional guarantees, Dalits and other marginalized communities continue to face discrimination, violence, and untouchability.
Many incidents of honor killings, forced displacement, and social boycott of Dalits and backward classes show that constitutional promises are still unfulfilled.
Failure of Law Enforcement:
The Constitution guarantees equal protection of law, but law enforcement often fails to protect the vulnerable.
Delays in justice or lack of strict action against perpetrators weaken the rights promised in Articles 14 and 21.
Political and Social Manipulation:
Certain policies or political moves sometimes exploit caste divisions or marginalize weaker sections, undermining the spirit of social justice.
The reservation system, though constitutional, is sometimes misused or politicized, creating resentment and inequalities contrary to Ambedkar’s vision of harmony.
Economic Inequality:
Dr. Ambedkar advocated for social and economic equality.
However, poverty, landlessness, and lack of access to education and healthcare among marginalized communities reflect a failure to implement constitutional guarantees in practice.
3. Symbolic Example (Hypothetical Illustration)
Imagine a Dalit family that legally owns land. Despite this:
Local authorities ignore illegal encroachments by upper-caste neighbors.
Police take no action when the family is threatened or attacked.
Courts take years to deliver justice.
Even though the Constitution guarantees equality, justice, and protection, the failure of institutions in practice is a direct contradiction of Dr. Ambedkar’s vision.
4. Why It’s Called a “Slap on the Face”
Dr. Ambedkar worked tirelessly to ensure social justice, liberty, and equality.
When marginalized groups are denied their fundamental rights or face systemic oppression, it negates the very essence of the Constitution.
It shows that while laws exist on paper, implementation and societal acceptance lag behind.
5. Key Takeaways
Constitution vs Reality: There is often a gap between the ideals of the Constitution and ground realities.
Need for Vigilance: Society, judiciary, and government must actively enforce constitutional protections.
Dr. Ambedkar’s Vision Remains Alive: Though challenged, his vision calls for continuous efforts to achieve equality and justice.
6. Conclusion
The biggest “slap” on the Constitution and Dr. Ambedkar is not a single event—it is the systemic failure to protect the rights of the most vulnerable. Every act of discrimination, injustice, or oppression that violates constitutional principles is a reminder that the work of social justice is unfinished, and Dr. Ambedkar’s dream is still a goal to be achieved.
RELATED Blog
0 comments