Legal Rights of Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) and Recent Revocations
- ByAdmin --
- 13 May 2025 --
- 0 Comments
The Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) scheme was introduced to offer persons of Indian origin a lifelong visa and limited rights to participate in Indian life. However, in recent years, several revocations of OCI status have brought attention to the legal framework governing these rights and the government's powers to cancel them.
Constitutional and Statutory Basis
- The Constitution of India, under Article 9, explicitly states that Indian citizenship is terminated once an Indian voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another country.
- The concept of dual citizenship is not recognized in India.
- The Citizenship Act, 1955, governs the OCI scheme. It was amended in 2005 to introduce the OCI category via the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2005.
- The rights and obligations of OCIs are specifically regulated by:
- Section 7A: Registration of OCIs.
- Section 7B: Rights of OCIs.
- Section 7D: Cancellation of OCI registration.
Rights of OCI Cardholders
While the OCI card grants many privileges, it does not equate to full Indian citizenship. Key rights include:
- Lifelong visa for visiting India multiple times.
- Exemption from registration with the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) for any length of stay.
- Parity with Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) in areas such as economic, financial, and educational fields, except in matters relating to:
- Voting rights.
- Holding constitutional posts.
- Employment in government services.
- Acquisition of agricultural or plantation properties.
Reference: Citizenship Act, 1955 - Section 7B.
Grounds for Revocation of OCI Status
The government can cancel an OCI registration under Section 7D of the Citizenship Act, 1955 if:
- The OCI cardholder obtained registration by fraud or concealment of facts.
- The cardholder has shown disaffection towards the Constitution of India.
- The cardholder has engaged in terrorist activities, espionage, or has been sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more within five years of registration.
- If it becomes necessary in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, security of India, or friendly relations with any foreign country.
Relevant Cases:
- Recent lawsuits, including one filed by a US journalist, have challenged revocations alleging arbitrary application without due process.
Recent Developments and Challenges
Several instances have emerged where prominent OCIs have had their status revoked, raising legal and diplomatic concerns:
- Journalists and activists critical of government policies have reported cancellation of their OCI cards.
- Allegations often cite "anti-India activities," but affected individuals claim lack of due process and vagueness in grounds for revocation.
- Courts have started emphasizing the need for procedural fairness, including notice and opportunity to be heard, before any cancellation.
Example:
In Apoorva Mandhani v. Union of India (pending), questions were raised on whether free speech critical of government policies could be considered grounds for OCI cancellation.
Judicial Interpretation
- Courts have generally upheld the government's power to cancel OCI registrations but have insisted on adherence to natural justice principles.
- In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1978), although not directly related to OCI, the Supreme Court emphasized that any punitive action by the State must meet standards of reasonableness under Article 14 (Right to Equality) and Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).
International Law Context
- India, as a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966, must ensure that revocations are not arbitrary and respect rights to freedom of movement and due process under Article 12 and Article 14 of the ICCPR.
Conclusion
The OCI program offers significant privileges but not citizenship rights. Recent revocations have highlighted the thin line between national security interests and individual rights. As India strengthens its ties with its diaspora, ensuring transparent procedures, clear guidelines, and judicial review mechanisms will be crucial to maintaining trust and fairness under Indian and international law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments