SC Orders All Colleges to Mandate Anti-Sexual Harassment Committees
- ByAdmin --
- 25 Apr 2025 --
- 0 Comments
In a groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court of India has directed that all colleges across the country must establish Anti-Sexual Harassment Committees in compliance with the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act). This ruling underscores the importance of creating a safe and inclusive environment for students and staff members, particularly women, and seeks to address the growing concerns around sexual harassment in educational institutions.
The Supreme Court’s decision comes in the wake of multiple incidents across the country where students have raised concerns regarding inadequate mechanisms to address sexual harassment and related issues on college campuses.
Key Aspects of the Supreme Court’s Order
- Mandating Anti-Sexual Harassment Committees:
- The Supreme Court has made it clear that every educational institution, including both government and private colleges, is required to form an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), which will be responsible for addressing any sexual harassment complaints that arise within the campus.
- The ICC should be in compliance with the guidelines laid down under the POSH Act, ensuring that it is independent, transparent, and fair in its proceedings.
- The Supreme Court has made it clear that every educational institution, including both government and private colleges, is required to form an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), which will be responsible for addressing any sexual harassment complaints that arise within the campus.
- Role of the Internal Complaints Committee:
- The Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) must consist of a presiding officer who is a woman, alongside members from diverse backgrounds, including non-governmental organizations that specialize in women’s rights and gender issues.
- The committee will be tasked with investigating complaints, taking appropriate action against perpetrators, and ensuring the protection of the victim's identity throughout the process.
- Institutions will also be required to conduct awareness programs about sexual harassment laws and create channels through which students and faculty can easily report incidents.
- The Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) must consist of a presiding officer who is a woman, alongside members from diverse backgrounds, including non-governmental organizations that specialize in women’s rights and gender issues.
- Preventive Measures and Awareness:
- The court has stressed the importance of preventive measures, which should include workshops, counseling, and sensitization sessions for both students and staff on gender equality and appropriate conduct.
- The goal is to foster an environment where sexual harassment is actively discouraged, and individuals feel safe to report incidents without fear of reprisal or stigma.
- The court has stressed the importance of preventive measures, which should include workshops, counseling, and sensitization sessions for both students and staff on gender equality and appropriate conduct.
- Compliance with the POSH Act:
- The POSH Act, which was enacted in 2013, mandates that all organizations, including educational institutions, should establish an internal complaints committee to deal with issues of sexual harassment. While the law primarily applied to workplaces, the court’s decision now extends these requirements to the education sector.
- Colleges that fail to establish these committees risk facing legal consequences, including penalties and possible revocation of accreditation.
- The POSH Act, which was enacted in 2013, mandates that all organizations, including educational institutions, should establish an internal complaints committee to deal with issues of sexual harassment. While the law primarily applied to workplaces, the court’s decision now extends these requirements to the education sector.
Legal Context and Constitutional Reference
- Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act):
- This act was brought into force to create a safe working environment for women and lays down clear guidelines for the prevention, prohibition, and redressal of sexual harassment. The law extends to all educational institutions, requiring them to implement measures to prevent sexual harassment and establish an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC).
- This act was brought into force to create a safe working environment for women and lays down clear guidelines for the prevention, prohibition, and redressal of sexual harassment. The law extends to all educational institutions, requiring them to implement measures to prevent sexual harassment and establish an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC).
- Article 21 of the Indian Constitution:
- The right to live with dignity, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, has been central to many rulings in favor of victims of sexual harassment. The Supreme Court in this case reiterated that educational institutions have a responsibility to ensure the dignity and safety of all their students and staff.
- The right to live with dignity, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, has been central to many rulings in favor of victims of sexual harassment. The Supreme Court in this case reiterated that educational institutions have a responsibility to ensure the dignity and safety of all their students and staff.
- Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997):
- The Vishaka Judgment, which laid down guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at the workplace, serves as the precursor to the POSH Act. This judgment highlighted the state’s duty to create a safe and harassment-free environment in educational institutions and workplaces, which the Supreme Court reaffirmed in its recent order.
Impact of the Supreme Court’s Decision
- Increased Accountability of Educational Institutions:
- The ruling brings greater accountability to educational institutions regarding the safety and well-being of students and staff members. It shifts the responsibility from being a mere recommendation to a legal obligation, ensuring that colleges cannot overlook the need for anti-sexual harassment measures.
- The ruling brings greater accountability to educational institutions regarding the safety and well-being of students and staff members. It shifts the responsibility from being a mere recommendation to a legal obligation, ensuring that colleges cannot overlook the need for anti-sexual harassment measures.
- Protection of Students’ Rights:
- The establishment of Anti-Sexual Harassment Committees ensures that students, particularly women, will have a protected space where they can report harassment without fear of retribution or public shame.
- The decision also acts as a deterrent for potential offenders, knowing that their actions will be met with appropriate legal consequences.
- The establishment of Anti-Sexual Harassment Committees ensures that students, particularly women, will have a protected space where they can report harassment without fear of retribution or public shame.
- Fostering Gender Equality:
- By mandating these committees and promoting awareness about sexual harassment, the Supreme Court aims to create a gender-sensitive culture within educational institutions. This step is expected to foster greater gender equality, where both men and women can coexist in a safe and respectful environment.
- By mandating these committees and promoting awareness about sexual harassment, the Supreme Court aims to create a gender-sensitive culture within educational institutions. This step is expected to foster greater gender equality, where both men and women can coexist in a safe and respectful environment.
- Challenges in Implementation:
- While the ruling is a positive development, many educational institutions, especially in rural areas, may face challenges in setting up the required infrastructure and ensuring compliance with the guidelines. This may require government intervention in providing necessary resources and training for staff members.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s directive to mandate Anti-Sexual Harassment Committees in all educational institutions is a significant step towards creating safer spaces for students, especially women, across India. This ruling enforces the POSH Act, which ensures that educational institutions adhere to a zero-tolerance policy toward sexual harassment. By making these committees mandatory, the Court has taken a firm stance in promoting gender equality and ensuring that victims of harassment have the means to seek justice in a fair and timely manner. The implementation of these committees will go a long way in protecting students’ rights and providing them with a secure environment to pursue their education.
RELATED Blog
0 comments