The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
🔹 Background and Purpose
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was enacted to provide a specialized forum for adjudication of disputes and complaints related to the service matters of persons appointed to public services and posts under the Central and State Governments.
Prior to this Act, disputes involving government servants had to be resolved through civil courts or writ petitions, often resulting in delayed justice. The Act was introduced to establish Administrative Tribunals to ensure speedy and expert resolution of such service-related disputes.
🔹 Objectives of the Act
To establish Administrative Tribunals for efficient and quick adjudication of service disputes.
To relieve civil courts and the High Courts from the burden of service matters.
To provide a forum with technical expertise in administrative and service law.
To ensure expeditious justice in government employment disputes.
To promote uniformity in the interpretation of service rules and regulations.
🔹 Key Provisions of the Act
1. Establishment of Tribunals (Section 3)
The Central Government is empowered to establish one or more Central Administrative Tribunals (CAT) for the Union.
State Governments may establish State Administrative Tribunals (SATs) for their respective states.
Tribunals have jurisdiction over service matters such as recruitment, promotion, conditions of service, dismissal, and disciplinary actions.
2. Jurisdiction and Powers (Sections 14 and 15)
The Tribunals have exclusive jurisdiction over service disputes, and civil courts are barred from entertaining such matters.
The Tribunals can grant relief, quash orders, or direct reinstatement.
They have powers similar to civil courts for summoning witnesses, enforcing attendance, receiving evidence on affidavits, and issuing orders.
3. Procedure (Section 16)
The Tribunal shall decide disputes expeditiously, following principles of natural justice but is not bound by the strict rules of evidence.
The procedure is intended to be simple, flexible, and speedy.
4. Appeals (Section 19)
Appeals from Tribunal decisions lie to the respective High Courts on questions of law.
The High Courts may admit appeals on substantial questions of law only.
5. Exclusion of Jurisdiction of Courts (Section 14)
Courts, including the High Courts and civil courts, have no jurisdiction over matters within the Tribunal’s domain, except for the limited scope of appeals.
6. Conditions of Service and Appointment (Sections 7-11)
Members of the Tribunal are appointed by the government and should have expertise in administrative or legal matters.
The Act prescribes the qualifications, terms, and conditions for tribunal members.
🧑⚖️ Relevant Case Law
The Administrative Tribunals Act has been examined and interpreted in several landmark Supreme Court decisions to clarify its scope, powers, and interaction with other constitutional provisions.
1. L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India (1997)
Issue: Whether decisions of Administrative Tribunals are subject to judicial review by the High Courts and Supreme Court.
Holding: The Supreme Court held that the power of judicial review vested in the High Courts and Supreme Court under Articles 226 and 32 of the Constitution cannot be ousted by the Act. High Courts can entertain writ petitions against Tribunal decisions on constitutional grounds.
2. Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel (1985)
Issue: Applicability of the Administrative Tribunals Act to disciplinary proceedings and service matters.
Holding: The Court clarified that the Act applies to a wide range of service matters, including disciplinary actions, and that tribunals are the appropriate forums for such disputes.
3. State of Punjab vs. Surjit Singh (2003)
Issue: Jurisdiction conflict between civil courts and tribunals.
Holding: The Court reiterated that civil courts have no jurisdiction in matters specifically vested with Administrative Tribunals.
4. Management of Indian Airlines vs. K. Venkatraman (1997)
Issue: Scope of powers of Administrative Tribunals regarding reinstatement and service conditions.
Holding: The Court held that tribunals have wide powers to pass appropriate orders to ensure justice in service matters.
🔹 Summary Table
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Year Enacted | 1985 |
| Purpose | To provide speedy adjudication of service disputes |
| Tribunals Created | Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and State Administrative Tribunals (SATs) |
| Jurisdiction | Service matters of government employees |
| Procedure | Informal, speedy, based on natural justice |
| Appeals | To High Courts on substantial questions of law |
| Key Case Law | L. Chandra Kumar (1997), Tulsiram Patel (1985), Surjit Singh (2003) |
📝 Importance of the Act
Provides a specialized forum for government employees to resolve service disputes.
Reduces backlog in civil courts and High Courts.
Facilitates speedy and expert disposal of cases.
Maintains uniformity and consistency in service jurisprudence.
Balances the rights of employees with administrative efficiency.
RELATED Blog
0 comments