Custodial Deaths in India: NHRC Data and Judicial Interventions
- ByAdmin --
- 26 May 2025 --
- 0 Comments
Custodial deaths remain a serious human rights concern in India, reflecting systemic challenges in law enforcement and prison administration. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) regularly compiles data on custodial deaths and issues guidelines aimed at preventing such incidents. Judicial interventions by the Supreme Court and various High Courts have been critical in shaping safeguards to uphold the rights and dignity of persons in custody. This article explores the latest NHRC data on custodial deaths, highlights key judicial pronouncements from 2024, and analyzes ongoing challenges in ensuring accountability and justice.
Legal Framework Governing Custodial Deaths
- Article 21 of the Constitution of India: Guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which extends to persons in custody.
- Indian Penal Code, Sections 302, 304, and 176: Criminalize murder, culpable homicide, and omission to take lawful measures to save life, applicable in custodial death cases.
- Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), Section 176(1A): Mandates magisterial inquiry into any unnatural death in custody.
- Directions from the Supreme Court: Guidelines established in D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) for arrest, detention, and custodial treatment to prevent torture and deaths.
- Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993: Constitutes the NHRC with powers to investigate custodial deaths and violations.
NHRC Data on Custodial Deaths (2023-2024)
- According to the NHRC’s recent annual report, India recorded over 400 custodial deaths nationwide in the last two years, with a majority occurring in police custody.
- The NHRC noted recurring causes such as torture, neglect of medical care, and delayed investigations.
- States with higher custodial death rates include Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu, highlighting regional enforcement and oversight disparities.
- NHRC issued 150 recommendations to state governments in 2024 to improve custodial conditions, emphasizing training, medical examination protocols, and independent inquiry commissions.
Judicial Interventions in 2024
- Supreme Court Ruling on Accountability: In a landmark 2024 judgment, the SC reaffirmed that custodial deaths amount to a grave violation of Article 21 and ordered strict penal action against erring officials. The Court mandated that all custodial deaths be reported within 24 hours to the NHRC and directed installation of CCTV cameras in all interrogation rooms.
- High Courts Emphasize Medical Care: Various High Courts, including the Madras and Delhi High Courts, have issued orders ensuring immediate and independent medical examination of arrested persons. The courts have underscored the role of magistrates in conducting prompt inquiries under CrPC Section 176(1A).
- Compensation and Rehabilitation: Courts have increasingly granted compensation to families of custodial death victims and directed state governments to set up rehabilitation schemes, affirming the State’s duty under Article 21 and the National Policy on Torture Prevention.
- Banning Illegal Custodial Practices: The judiciary has proscribed the use of third-degree methods, illegal confinement, and physical abuse, linking these to violations of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Systemic Challenges Highlighted by Courts and NHRC
- Lack of Proper Monitoring and Transparency: Despite guidelines, many police stations lack CCTV surveillance and fail to maintain proper arrest records, increasing the risk of abuse.
- Delayed or Flawed Investigations: Courts and NHRC reports criticize the frequent delays in magisterial inquiries and police investigations, often resulting in denial of justice.
- Inadequate Training of Police Personnel: There is a need for mandatory human rights and legal procedure training for law enforcement officials to prevent custodial torture and deaths.
- Underreporting and Data Discrepancies: Many custodial deaths remain unreported or misclassified, complicating efforts for effective oversight.
Recommendations and Best Practices
- Mandatory Video Recording: Supreme Court orders require video recording of all interrogations and medical examinations to ensure transparency.
- Periodic Medical Checks: Arrested persons should be examined by independent medical professionals within six hours of detention, as per NHRC guidelines.
- Immediate Magistrate Notification: Arresting officers must inform magistrates promptly, and magisterial inquiries should be conducted within 48 hours.
- Use of Technology and Oversight Bodies: Expansion of CCTV coverage, body cameras, and creation of independent oversight committees to monitor custodial conditions.
- Legal Aid and Victim Support: Providing free legal aid to detainees and families of victims, along with psychological counseling and rehabilitation support.
Conclusion
Custodial deaths represent a violation not only of individual rights but also of the rule of law and public trust in law enforcement. The NHRC’s data and judicial pronouncements in 2024 reflect ongoing efforts to address this serious issue through stricter accountability, enhanced oversight, and protection of human dignity under Article 21. However, entrenched systemic challenges demand sustained commitment from all stakeholders—including the police, judiciary, and government—to ensure custodial environments are safe, transparent, and humane. Only through combined legal rigor and administrative reforms can India hope to eradicate custodial deaths and uphold constitutional values.
RELATED Blog
0 comments