Chennai’s Elevated Corridor Plan Stayed Due to Lack of Green Clearance: A Pause for Environmental Due Process
- ByAdmin --
- 16 Apr 2025 --
- 0 Comments
In a significant judicial intervention balancing development and environmental accountability, the Southern Bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has stayed construction of the Chennai Elevated Corridor Project, citing the absence of mandatory environmental and forest clearances. The order was passed in response to a petition filed by environmental activists and civic organizations concerned about deforestation, wetland destruction, and the lack of public consultation.
The decision comes at a time when Chennai’s urban expansion and infrastructure demands are increasing, but so is its vulnerability to urban flooding, heatwaves, and ecosystem loss. The NGT’s stay is not a rejection of infrastructure—it is a call for compliance with law and environmental stewardship.
About the Project
The Chennai Elevated Corridor Project (CECP) is a multi-phase infrastructure initiative launched by the Tamil Nadu Highways Department, aiming to:
- Build over 120 km of elevated expressways
- Connect major arterial roads and industrial zones
- Decongest the Outer Ring Road (ORR) and Chennai Bypass
- Enhance urban mobility, reduce travel time, and facilitate freight movement
The project includes major stretches through Perungudi marshlands, Adyar riverbanks, and portions of the Pallikaranai wetland zone, which are critical for Chennai’s flood absorption and biodiversity.
The Legal Challenge: Petitioners’ Core Arguments
A group of Chennai-based environmentalists and civic bodies approached the NGT alleging:
- The CECP began pre-construction and site preparation activities without obtaining Environmental Clearance (EC) as mandated under the EIA Notification, 2006
- There was no forest clearance under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, despite the proposed route affecting reserve forests and wetland eco-sensitive zones
- Public hearings were bypassed, violating the EIA’s participatory mandate
- The Detailed Project Report (DPR) undervalued ecological impact, ignoring marshlands and migratory bird habitats
- No alternative alignment study was conducted to avoid ecological hotspots
NGT’s Observations and Orders
The NGT bench led by Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana and Expert Member Satyagopal Korlapati passed an interim stay on all construction and procurement activities related to the CECP until:
- A proper environmental impact assessment is submitted
- Public consultation is conducted
- Necessary clearances from the MoEFCC and Tamil Nadu Forest Department are obtained
The tribunal emphasized that:
“The failure to comply with basic environmental safeguards before executing a project of this scale is not merely procedural lapse—it is a violation of ecological trust and statutory law.”
Ecological Significance of the Impact Zone
The planned corridor passes through or adjacent to:
- Pallikaranai Marshland, a Ramsar site candidate and one of South India’s last remaining urban freshwater wetlands
- Adyar and Cooum riverbanks, which are already under severe ecological pressure
- Migratory bird nesting zones, amphibian-rich areas, and fish-breeding grounds
These regions play a crucial role in:
- Urban flood mitigation, especially during monsoons
- Carbon sequestration and air purification
- Habitat connectivity for endangered species
Any alteration without ecological study risks irreversible biodiversity loss and urban climate disaster amplification.
Government and Project Proponents’ Defense
The Tamil Nadu Highways Department has maintained that:
- The CECP is a strategic necessity for reducing vehicular congestion and promoting logistics efficiency
- The alignment avoids core marshland areas, and minimal vegetation clearance was planned
- Since the project is linear infrastructure, certain exemptions may apply under recent EIA amendments
However, they have now agreed to pause further activity and seek post-facto approvals, if required, while contesting the petitioners’ claims.
Expert Views and Civil Society Response
Urban ecologists and legal scholars welcomed the stay, calling it a timely intervention to prevent Chennai from repeating the mistakes of unplanned concretization that led to its devastating floods in 2015 and 2021.
They emphasize.
- Linear infrastructure should not mean linear thinking—especially in fragile urban ecologies
- Infrastructure must be climate-resilient, not just traffic-responsive
Resident welfare associations also expressed concerns about the displacement of low-income communities, lack of stakeholder consultation, and increase in ambient heat due to flyover construction.
Legal Context: Clearance Mandates under Indian Law
According to the EIA Notification, 2006, any construction project over 50,000 sq. meters or involving sensitive zones:
- Must conduct a detailed environmental impact assessment
- Must host public hearings and community consultations
- Must receive prior EC and CRZ clearance (if applicable)
Failure to comply can result in project suspension, environmental compensation, or legal liability under the Environment Protection Act.
What Lies Ahead
The NGT has asked the state and central authorities to:
- Submit a complete status report within eight weeks
- Produce the project’s hydrological and ecological assessments
- Present mitigation strategies and alternatives considered
Final hearings are expected in mid-2025. Depending on the findings, the tribunal may:
- Allow a redesigned and environmentally compliant version of the project
- Direct a relocation of alignment
- Impose environmental fines or restoration costs
Green Clearance Is Not a Technicality—It’s a Commitment
The Chennai Elevated Corridor Project has the potential to transform urban mobility—but not at the cost of wetlands, wildlife, and people’s safety. The NGT’s stay is not an obstruction to progress; it’s a reminder that lawful development is sustainable development.
Because building for tomorrow begins with respecting the natural systems that already protect us today.
RELATED Blog
0 comments