The Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998
๐ Background
Lotteries have been a source of state revenue in many Indian states. However, they also gave rise to social issues like gambling addiction, financial ruin of individuals, and criminal involvement. Before 1998, there was no central law regulating lotteries, and different states had different rules.
To bring uniformity and control, the Lotteries (Regulation) Act was passed in 1998, empowering states to regulate, ban, or promote lotteries under specific conditions.
๐ฏ Objectives of the Act
To regulate the conduct of lotteries organized by State Governments.
To prevent illegal and unauthorized lotteries.
To protect public interest and curb fraudulent practices.
To give power to states to either promote or prohibit lotteries.
โ๏ธ Key Provisions of the Act
๐น Section 3 โ Conditions for Organizing Lotteries
A State Government may organize a lottery, but it must follow these mandatory conditions:
Draw should be conducted only once a week (for regular lotteries).
Tickets should bear the logo and name of the State Government.
The place of draw must be located within the organizing state.
Prize money must be disbursed only through cheques, demand drafts, or electronic transfer (no cash).
There must be an authorized officer present during the draw.
A monthly or Bumper lottery can be held separately with proper approval.
๐น Section 4 โ Prohibition of Sale in Other States
A state can prohibit the sale of lottery tickets of other states within its own territory.
So, inter-state sale is not mandatory; a state has the right to ban lotteries from other states.
๐น Section 5 โ Power to Prohibit Lotteries
The Central Government can, by notification, prohibit a lottery if it violates the rules of the Act.
๐น Section 6 โ Penalty for Contravention
Anyone who violates provisions of this Act may face:
Imprisonment up to 2 years,
Or fine,
Or both.
If itโs a company, the person in charge of the company is also deemed guilty.
๐น Section 7 โ Offences by Companies
If a company violates the Act, both the company and the responsible persons are punishable.
๐๏ธ Constitutional Aspect
๐ Entry in Constitution:
Lotteries fall under Entry 40 of List I (Union List): โLotteries organized by the Government of India or the Government of a State.โ
This gives both the Centre and States the power to deal with lotteries.
However, States have full discretion to ban or allow lotteries within their boundaries.
๐จโโ๏ธ Important Case Laws
1. B.R. Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1999)
Facts:
UP and other states banned the sale of lotteries organized by other states.
Lottery organizers challenged the bans.
Held:
The Supreme Court upheld the right of States to ban lotteries from other States.
It clarified that right to conduct lottery is not a fundamental right.
Also held that the central Act allows states to prohibit or regulate lotteries within their borders.
2. State of Kerala v. All Kerala Online Lottery Dealers Association (2015)
Facts:
Kerala banned online lotteries of other states.
The dealers claimed it was discriminatory.
Held:
Supreme Court ruled that Kerala's action was valid.
The state has power to prohibit online lotteries for public welfare.
Differentiating between paper lotteries and online lotteries is not arbitrary.
3. Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2020)
Facts:
Petitioner challenged the levy of GST on lotteries, claiming it was a form of actionable claim and not "goods".
Held:
Supreme Court held that lotteries are goods under GST law.
Government has the right to tax lottery tickets.
๐ Impact of the Act
Several states like Kerala, Maharashtra, and Sikkim run regulated state lotteries.
Some states like Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, and Karnataka have completely banned lotteries.
Online lotteries have come under scrutiny and have been banned in multiple states.
Illegal and black-market lotteries have reduced due to enforcement of the Act, though challenges remain.
๐งพ Conclusion
The Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 is a comprehensive law aimed at ensuring that lotteries are conducted in a fair, transparent, and controlled manner, or banned altogether, as per the decision of individual states. It balances federal powers, giving states autonomy while maintaining a central regulatory framework. The Act has been upheld and interpreted by courts in various judgments, emphasizing that conducting a lottery is not a fundamental right, but a regulated commercial activity.
RELATED Blog
0 comments