Syllabus: Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services (Civil Judge)
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Exam (Civil Judge) — Detailed Syllabus
1. Introduction
The Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service Examination is conducted to recruit Civil Judges (Junior Division) in the state's subordinate judiciary. The exam tests candidates on various aspects of law, focusing on both substantive and procedural laws, constitutional principles, and general legal aptitude.
The syllabus is comprehensive and designed to assess the candidate’s knowledge and suitability for judicial duties.
2. Exam Structure
The UP Judicial Service Exam typically comprises:
Preliminary Exam (Objective Type)
Main Exam (Written)
Interview / Viva Voce
3. Detailed Syllabus
A. Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts (Section 9, 11)
Res judicata (Section 11)
Suits relating to immovable property
Pleadings (Order 6)
Appearance and Non-appearance of parties (Order 5, 9)
Written Statement and Defence
Framing of Issues (Order 14)
Discovery, Inspection, and Production of Documents (Order 11-13)
Hearing and Trial
Judgment and Decrees (Order 20)
Execution of Decrees (Order 21)
Arrest and Attachment before Judgment (Order 37)
Appeals, Review and Revision
Injunctions and Interlocutory Orders (Sections 36-41)
Important Case Law:
Nair Service Society Ltd. v. K.C. Alexander (1968): Principles of res judicata.
Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2003): Need for expeditious trial.
M.C. Chockalingam v. M. Chockalingam (1970): Scope of Order 37 for summary suits.
B. Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
General principles of criminal liability
Offences against the State (Sections 121-130)
Offences against the public tranquility (Sections 141-160)
Offences affecting human body (Sections 299-338)
Offences against property (Sections 378-462)
Criminal Conspiracy and attempts (Sections 120A, 511)
Punishments and sentencing principles
Important Case Law:
K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962): Distinction between murder and culpable homicide.
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980): Guidelines on death penalty.
R. v. Dudley & Stephens (1884): Defence of necessity in criminal law.
C. Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973
Arrest and Bail (Sections 41, 437, 439)
Investigation and inquiry processes
Charge and trial procedures
Trial of summons and warrant cases
Judgment and sentencing
Appeals, revision, and review
Public nuisance and preventive actions
Juvenile justice provisions
Important Case Law:
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997): Arrest and detention safeguards.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): Right to personal liberty and fair procedure.
Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1979): Right to speedy trial.
D. Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Relevancy of facts (Sections 5-55)
Admissions and confessions
Statements by persons who cannot be called as witnesses
Expert opinions and examination of witnesses
Burden of proof and presumption
Documentary and circumstantial evidence
Dying declaration (Section 32)
Important Case Law:
Queen-Empress v. Durgadoo (1897): On the reliability of dying declarations.
K.M. Nanavati Case: Evidentiary value of confessions.
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra (1984): Circumstantial evidence.
E. Constitution of India
Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
Union and State Executive and Legislature
Judiciary and its powers, including Writ Jurisdiction
Centre-State relations
Amendment procedure
Emergency provisions
Important Case Law:
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): Basic structure doctrine.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): Due process and personal liberty.
Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980): Balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
F. Law of Contracts and Specific Relief Act
Essentials of a valid contract
Void and voidable contracts
Performance and breach of contracts
Quasi contracts
Remedies for breach of contract
Specific performance and injunctions
Important Case Law:
Hadley v. Baxendale: Rules on remoteness of damages.
Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. (1954): Specific performance guidelines.
G. Local and Special Laws Applicable in Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh Rent Control Act
Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction)
Any other relevant state laws and amendments.
H. General Knowledge and Current Affairs
Indian polity and governance
Important Supreme Court and High Court judgments
Legal reforms and amendments
Basic international law concepts and treaties
4. Exam Pattern
Preliminary Exam
Objective type questions from all subjects.
Test of legal aptitude, general knowledge, and reasoning.
Main Exam (Written)
Paper 1: Civil Law including CPC, Contract Act, Evidence Act
Paper 2: Criminal Law including IPC, CrPC, Evidence Act
Paper 3: Constitution of India and General Knowledge
Interview / Viva-Voce
Assessment of legal knowledge, personality, and suitability for judicial service.
5. Important Tips
Understand the application of procedural laws thoroughly.
Focus on landmark Supreme Court and High Court judgments.
Practice legal reasoning and drafting.
Stay updated on amendments and current legal trends.
Regularly solve previous year question papers.
6. Conclusion
The Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service Exam for Civil Judge requires an in-depth understanding of both substantive and procedural law, with emphasis on judicial principles, case laws, and the ability to apply legal knowledge practically.
Preparation should be focused on theoretical knowledge, case laws, and application of law in factual scenarios to excel in all stages of the examination.
RELATED Blog
0 comments