The Trade Marks Act, 1999
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Overview
The Trade Marks Act, 1999 is the central legislation in India governing the registration, protection, and enforcement of trademarks. It replaced the earlier Trade and Merchandise Marks Act of 1958 to modernize trademark law in line with international standards, especially the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) under the World Trade Organization (WTO).
The Act regulates:
Registration of trademarks,
Rights of trademark owners,
Remedies against infringement,
Passing off,
Penalties for violations, and
Procedures before the Registrar of Trade Marks.
Key Concepts in the Act
1. What is a Trademark?
A trademark is a sign capable of being represented graphically which distinguishes goods or services of one person from those of others. It can be:
Words,
Names,
Symbols,
Logos,
Combinations of colors,
Sounds, or
3D shapes.
2. Registration of Trademark
The Act provides a procedure to apply for registration with the Trade Marks Registry.
Registration grants the owner the exclusive right to use the trademark concerning the goods/services listed.
Registration is valid for 10 years and can be renewed indefinitely.
3. Rights of Trademark Owner
Exclusive right to use, license, or assign the trademark.
Prevent others from using a confusingly similar mark.
Prevent infringement and passing off.
4. Infringement of Trademark
Trademark infringement occurs when an unauthorized party uses a mark identical or similar to a registered trademark for identical or similar goods/services likely to cause confusion.
The Act defines civil remedies (injunction, damages, accounts) and criminal penalties for infringement.
5. Passing Off
Protects unregistered trademarks through common law remedies.
Prevents one person from misrepresenting their goods/services as those of another, causing damage to the latter’s goodwill.
6. Well-Known Trademarks
The Act provides special protection for well-known trademarks even if not registered in a particular class.
It prevents registration or use of marks that dilute or take unfair advantage of a well-known mark.
7. Other Provisions
Registrar of Trade Marks: Powers to register, hear oppositions, rectify registers.
Trademark Agents: Authorized to represent applicants.
Appeals: Against Registrar decisions lie to the Intellectual Property Appellate Board.
Offenses and Penalties: For counterfeiting, falsification, and wrongful use.
Important Sections to Note
Section 2(1)(zb) – Definition of trademark.
Section 9 – Absolute grounds for refusal (e.g., generic names, deceptive marks).
Section 11 – Relative grounds for refusal (e.g., similarity causing confusion).
Section 29 – Infringement of registered trademark.
Section 30 – Exceptions to infringement.
Section 27 – Rights conferred by registration.
Section 135 – Offenses and penalties for counterfeiting.
Important Case Laws Related to The Trade Marks Act, 1999
1. Cadbury India Ltd. v. Neeraj Food Products (2014)
Issue: Whether a color (purple) can be registered and protected as a trademark.
Court's Holding: The Supreme Court held that colors can be trademarks if they have acquired distinctiveness and identify the goods of a particular manufacturer.
Significance: This case expanded trademark protection to non-conventional marks like colors.
2. Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India (2005)
Issue: Whether the artist's signature and work can be protected as a trademark.
Court's Holding: The Court emphasized the importance of protecting intellectual property and supported broader interpretations of what constitutes a trademark.
Significance: It affirmed protection for marks beyond traditional words or logos.
3. Titan Industries Ltd. v. M/s Madasu Co. (1998)
Issue: Whether the use of “Titan” by another party infringed the trademark.
Court's Holding: The Court upheld the exclusive rights of Titan, finding infringement due to the similarity causing confusion among consumers.
Significance: Reinforced the principle of likelihood of confusion in trademark infringement.
4. Rupa & Co. Ltd. v. Union of India (2002)
Issue: Can a word that has become generic lose trademark protection?
Court's Holding: The Court ruled that if a trademark becomes generic for a type of goods, it can lose its protection.
Significance: Highlights the doctrine of genericide where trademarks become generic names over time.
5. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. (2008)
Issue: Use of well-known marks in domain names and broadcasting.
Court's Holding: Emphasized protection of well-known trademarks against unauthorized use.
Significance: Reinforced protection of famous marks across different mediums.
Summary
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Protect trademarks, prevent infringement and passing off. |
| Registration | Grants exclusive rights for 10 years, renewable. |
| Rights | Use, license, assign, prevent infringement. |
| Infringement | Unauthorized use causing confusion or dilution. |
| Passing Off | Protects unregistered marks from unfair use. |
| Well-known Marks | Special protection regardless of registration. |
| Penalties | Civil remedies and criminal sanctions for violations. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments