The Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952
The Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952
🔹 Background and Purpose
The Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952 provides the legal framework for the election of the President and Vice-President of India, who are the highest constitutional dignitaries in the country.
The Act lays down the procedures, qualifications, disqualifications, and conduct of elections for these offices to ensure that the process is fair, transparent, and consistent with the constitutional provisions.
🔹 Objectives of the Act
To regulate the election process for the offices of the President and Vice-President of India.
To prescribe the qualifications and disqualifications for candidates.
To lay down the conduct, procedure, and machinery for the smooth conduct of elections.
To empower the Election Commission to oversee the election process.
To provide rules regarding nomination, scrutiny, withdrawal, polling, counting, and declaration of results.
🔹 Key Provisions of the Act
1. Applicability
The Act applies specifically to the election of the President (Part I) and the election of the Vice-President (Part II).
Some provisions are common, but separate rules apply to each election.
2. Electoral College
For the President’s election, the electoral college consists of elected members of:
Lok Sabha (House of the People)
Rajya Sabha (Council of States)
State Legislative Assemblies
For the Vice-President’s election, the electoral college includes members (elected and nominated) of both houses of Parliament.
3. Qualifications and Disqualifications
The qualifications for the President are prescribed by Article 58 of the Constitution; the Act provides procedural rules.
The Vice-President must meet qualifications as per Article 66.
The Act also sets the rules for nomination and disqualification, such as insolvency, criminal conviction, unsoundness of mind, etc.
4. Nomination of Candidates
Candidates must submit a nomination paper signed by a certain number of proposers and seconders.
A security deposit is required to ensure serious candidates only.
5. Scrutiny and Withdrawal
Nomination papers are scrutinized by the Returning Officer.
Candidates may withdraw their candidature within a stipulated period after scrutiny.
6. Polling and Voting
The election is conducted by secret ballot.
The method of voting is single transferable vote (STV) with proportional representation.
The Act prescribes detailed rules on how votes are counted and transferred.
7. Counting of Votes and Declaration of Results
The Returning Officer counts votes based on the STV method.
The candidate who obtains the required quota of votes is declared elected.
If no candidate meets the quota in the first round, subsequent rounds are conducted by transferring votes until a candidate secures the majority.
8. Election Disputes
The Act provides that disputes or objections relating to the election must be referred to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court’s decision is final.
9. Penalties
The Act prescribes penalties for corrupt practices, impersonation, undue influence, or any attempt to interfere with the election.
🔹 Important Sections to Note
Section 3 — Qualification and disqualification of candidates.
Section 6 — Filing and scrutiny of nominations.
Section 8 — Withdrawal of candidature.
Section 15 — Method of voting and counting.
Section 19 — Declaration of result.
Section 23 — Trial of election disputes in Supreme Court.
🧑⚖️ Relevant Case Law
1. Rameshwar Prasad vs. Union of India (2006)
Issue: The Supreme Court examined electoral reforms and the extent of Election Commission's powers.
Relevance: Though this case dealt mainly with parliamentary elections, principles about free and fair elections apply to presidential elections as well, affirming the independent role of the Election Commission under the Act.
2. Shyam Narain vs. Union of India (1952)
Issue: Validity of certain nomination procedures under the Act.
Judgment: The court upheld the nomination requirements as valid and essential for ensuring only genuine candidates contest.
3. Kuldip Nayar vs. Union of India (2006)
Issue: Transparency and fairness in elections.
Relevance: The Supreme Court underscored the need for strict compliance with election laws, including the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, to maintain the sanctity of elections.
4. M. Karunanidhi vs. Union of India (1995)
Issue: Election procedure irregularities.
Outcome: The court reinforced the role of the Election Commission in strictly adhering to statutory procedures laid down in the Act to prevent election malpractices.
🔹 Summary
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Purpose | To regulate elections for President and Vice-President of India |
| Electoral College | President: Elected MPs & MLAs; Vice-President: MPs only |
| Voting System | Single transferable vote with secret ballot |
| Nomination | Requires proposers, seconders, and security deposit |
| Dispute Resolution | Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction |
| Authority | Conducted under the supervision of the Election Commission |
RELATED Blog
0 comments