Doctrine of Subrogation: Meaning, Case laws and Provisions
📘 Doctrine of Subrogation
🔹 Meaning of Subrogation
The Doctrine of Subrogation is a principle of equity, insurance law, and contract law, under which a person who has paid off the debt or liability of another is entitled to step into the shoes of the creditor and exercise all rights and remedies that the creditor had against the debtor.
In simple terms:
Subrogation allows a person (usually an insurer or surety) who has compensated another to claim repayment from the third party responsible for the loss.
🔹 Example
Suppose A’s house is damaged due to the negligence of B, but A has insurance. The insurance company pays for the damage. Then, under subrogation, the insurance company can sue B (the wrongdoer) to recover the amount it paid to A.
🔹 Legal Provisions in Indian Law
Section 92 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872:
Deals with a person who has paid the amount due under the contract and becomes entitled to the rights of the creditor.
Section 79 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882:
Provides subrogation rights to a person who redeems a mortgage.
Section 140 and 141 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872:
Deals with the rights of surety after payment.
Insurance Act, 1938 and Marine Insurance Act, 1963:
Provide statutory recognition to subrogation in insurance.
🔹 Types of Subrogation
Equitable Subrogation:
Arises by operation of law; no need for a written contract.
Common in insurance and suretyship.
Contractual Subrogation:
Based on a specific agreement or contract.
Statutory Subrogation:
Created by statutes (e.g., Transfer of Property Act, Contract Act).
⚖️ Important Case Laws
1. Union of India v. Sri Sarada Mills Ltd. (1972 AIR 1566)
Facts: The insurer paid for the damage caused to goods in transit by the railway authorities. The insurer then sued the railway for negligence.
Held: The Supreme Court held that once the insurer pays the insured, he is subrogated to the rights of the insured and can sue the wrongdoer (railway) in the name of the insured.
Principle: Established the principle that subrogation allows the insurer to step into the shoes of the insured.
2. Economic Transport Organization v. Charan Spinning Mills (2010) 4 SCC 114
Facts: An insurer filed a suit in its own name instead of in the name of the insured after settling the insurance claim.
Held: The Supreme Court held that in the absence of an assignment, the insurer cannot sue in its own name. The suit must be filed in the name of the insured, even though the insurer has the right of subrogation.
Principle: Clarified that subrogation does not transfer ownership or title; it only provides the right to recover the loss from the third party responsible.
3. Oberai Forwarding Agency v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2000) 2 SCC 407
Facts: The insurer sued in its own name under a letter of subrogation-cum-assignment.
Held: The court held that subrogation and assignment are different. A mere subrogation does not give the right to sue in the insurer's own name unless there is an assignment of rights.
Principle: A letter of subrogation cannot be treated as an assignment unless it clearly transfers ownership of the claim.
4. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. A.K. Abdul Muthalif (2001) 6 SCC 372
Held: Reiterated that the right of subrogation enables the insurer to recover from third parties responsible for the loss, but such recovery must be in the name of the insured unless rights are formally assigned.
🔹 Subrogation vs Assignment
| Feature | Subrogation | Assignment |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Arises by law or agreement | Created only by a written contract |
| Rights | Limited to rights of indemnification | Full transfer of all rights |
| Name in Suit | Must sue in the name of insured | Assignee can sue in own name |
| Ownership | No ownership of claim | Complete transfer of ownership |
✅ Key Takeaways
Subrogation allows a third party (like an insurer or surety) to recover the amount paid on behalf of the insured or principal debtor.
It does not create ownership, only a right to recover.
Legal action must usually be taken in the name of the insured, unless rights are assigned.
Supported by equity, contract, and statutory provisions.
Courts have carefully distinguished between subrogation and assignment, especially in insurance claims.
RELATED Blog
0 comments