Who are Competent to Contract
Competency to Contract under Indian Contract Law
1. Definition of Competency to Contract
Competency to contract means that a person must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract. For a contract to be valid, the parties involved must be competent to contract.
2. Legal Provision: Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Section 11 defines who is competent to contract:
"Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject, and who is of sound mind, and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject."
3. Elements of Competency
There are three key elements in Section 11 that determine competency:
A. Age of Majority
The person must have attained the age of majority.
As per the Indian Majority Act, 1875, the age of majority is 18 years.
A minor (person below 18 years) is incompetent to contract.
Contracts entered into by minors are void ab initio (void from the beginning).
B. Sound Mind
The person must be of sound mind at the time of making the contract.
Sound mind means that the person understands the contract's nature and consequences.
A person who is insane, mentally ill, or intoxicated (to the extent that they cannot understand the contract) is incompetent.
C. Not Disqualified by Law
Certain persons may be disqualified from contracting by specific laws.
Examples include:
Alien enemies during wartime.
Persons disqualified by personal laws (like lunatics).
Insolvents, in certain cases.
4. Explanation of Each Element with Cases
A. Age of Majority
Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903)
A landmark case where the Privy Council held that a contract with a minor is void ab initio.
Mohori Bibee, a minor, mortgaged property; the contract was declared void.
Established the rule that minors are incompetent to contract.
B. Sound Mind
Ramsundar v. State of West Bengal (1954)
The court held that a person must be capable of understanding the nature of the contract and its implications to be competent.
Iqbal Singh Marwah v. Meenakshi Marwah (2005)
The court discussed competency where mental soundness was questioned.
If a person is temporarily insane or intoxicated at the time of contract, the contract may be void or voidable depending on circumstances.
C. Not Disqualified by Law
Lakshmi Ratanlal v. Union of India (1953)
Discussed situations where statutory laws disqualify persons from contracting.
Certain disqualifications are based on public policy or specific statutory provisions.
5. Special Categories of Persons
Minors
Not competent to contract.
Any contract by a minor is void.
Protection is to safeguard minors from exploitation.
Persons of Unsound Mind
If a person is incapable of understanding the contract or its consequences, they are incompetent.
Contracts made during periods of lucid intervals may be valid.
Persons Disqualified by Law
Alien enemies, insolvents (under certain circumstances), and other categories as defined by specific laws.
6. Importance of Competency
Competency is fundamental to the validity of a contract.
An incompetent person’s contract is void or voidable, meaning it has no legal effect.
Protects vulnerable persons from exploitation.
7. Summary Table
| Element of Competency | Explanation | Key Case |
|---|---|---|
| Age of Majority | Must be 18 or older | Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose |
| Sound Mind | Must understand contract and effects | Ramsundar v. State of WB |
| Not Disqualified by Law | No statutory disqualification | Lakshmi Ratanlal v. Union of India |
8. Conclusion
Competency to contract is a vital requirement under the Indian Contract Act. It ensures that contracts are entered into by persons who are legally capable of understanding and undertaking contractual obligations. The law thus protects minors, mentally unsound persons, and others disqualified by law from the consequences of invalid or exploitative contracts.
RELATED Blog
0 comments