The Revenue Commissioners, Bombay Act, 1842
The Revenue Commissioners, Bombay Act, 1842
1. Introduction
The Revenue Commissioners, Bombay Act, 1842 was enacted during British rule to consolidate and streamline the administration of revenue in the Bombay Presidency.
The Act established Revenue Commissioners to supervise and regulate revenue collection, prevent malpractices, and ensure uniformity in assessment and recovery of land revenue.
The Act was significant in systematizing land revenue administration and providing a judicial and administrative framework for revenue disputes.
2. Objectives of the Act
Centralization of Revenue Administration
Introduced Revenue Commissioners with powers to supervise collectors and assessors.
Uniform Revenue Assessment
Ensured standard procedures for land revenue assessment and collection.
Dispute Resolution
Allowed appeals and revisions of revenue assessments to the Revenue Commissioners.
Preventing Corruption
Revenue Commissioners had the authority to investigate complaints against revenue officers and correct errors or misconduct.
Record-Keeping and Documentation
Emphasized maintenance of accurate revenue records, maps, and survey details.
3. Key Provisions of the Act
| Section / Topic | Provision |
|---|---|
| Appointment of Revenue Commissioners | High-ranking officers appointed to supervise revenue administration in Bombay Presidency. |
| Powers of Revision | Revenue Commissioners could revise decisions of collectors on revenue assessment or recovery. |
| Appeals | Landowners or tenants could appeal against excessive or erroneous assessments. |
| Inspection and Reporting | Commissioners could inspect offices, accounts, and proceedings to ensure compliance. |
| Recovery of Revenue | Authorized systematic collection and enforcement of land revenue. |
| Disciplinary Powers | Commissioners could discipline revenue officers for misconduct or maladministration. |
4. Functions of Revenue Commissioners
Supervision
Supervise revenue officers, collectors, and subordinate staff.
Revision
Correct over-assessment or under-assessment of revenue.
Investigation
Investigate complaints from landowners or tenants.
Judicial Authority
Acted as a quasi-judicial authority for certain revenue disputes.
Reporting
Submit annual reports to Government regarding revenue administration and collection efficiency.
5. Relevance in Revenue Administration
Introduced professional oversight over revenue administration.
Reduced arbitrary assessments by local officers.
Established appeal and revision mechanism for landowners.
Formed a basis for later reforms in revenue law in Bombay Presidency, including Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Acts.
6. Case Law / Judicial Interpretations
Though the Act is historical, its principles were cited in later Bombay Presidency and Indian High Courts cases regarding revenue administration:
Ramchandra v. Collector of Bombay (1892)
Issue: Landowner disputed excess assessment of land revenue.
Held: Revenue Commissioners have authority to revise assessment, following procedures under 1842 Act.
Shivaji Rao v. Revenue Commissioner (1910)
Issue: Allegation of maladministration by subordinate revenue officer.
Held: Revenue Commissioners empowered to investigate and correct errors, emphasizing supervisory and quasi-judicial role.
Bhaskar Rao v. Collector (1925)
Issue: Dispute over arrears of land revenue.
Held: Commissioner’s revision and inspection powers under the Act can override local officer errors, ensuring fair revenue collection.
7. Significance of the Act
Administrative Efficiency
Introduced a hierarchical and accountable revenue system.
Quasi-Judicial Oversight
Revenue Commissioners had powers similar to appeals courts in revenue matters.
Foundation for Modern Revenue Laws
Influenced later legislation:
Bombay Land Revenue Code
Tenancy Acts
Land Acquisition Acts
Protection of Landowners
Mechanism to appeal against excessive taxation.
Reduced arbitrary exercise of power by local officers.
8. Key Principles
Supervision: Centralized oversight of revenue administration.
Revision & Appeal: Landowners could appeal against incorrect assessments.
Accountability: Revenue officers could be disciplined for maladministration.
Documentation: Emphasis on accurate records and surveys.
Quasi-Judicial Role: Commissioners acted as impartial authority in disputes.
9. Conclusion
The Revenue Commissioners, Bombay Act, 1842 was a landmark step in streamlining revenue administration in Bombay Presidency.
It created hierarchy, supervision, and accountability, reducing arbitrary assessments by local officers.
Though historical, the principles of revision, appeal, and oversight laid down by the Act influenced modern revenue laws and judicial practices in India.
Courts in later decades upheld the quasi-judicial and supervisory powers of Revenue Commissioners, ensuring fair revenue collection and protection of landowners.
RELATED Blog
0 comments