Analytical School of Jurisprudence
Analytical School of Jurisprudence
Introduction
The Analytical School of Jurisprudence is one of the classical schools of legal philosophy that focuses on the analysis and logical structure of law. It aims to describe and understand law by breaking it down into its essential elements, without considering moral, social, or political influences.
This school is primarily concerned with what the law is rather than what the law ought to be.
Key Features
Law as a System of Rules
Law is a set of rules or commands issued by a sovereign authority, which must be obeyed.
Separation of Law and Morality
Law is distinct from morality. Legal validity depends on the source and form, not on moral considerations.
Focus on Clarity and Precision
Emphasizes clear definitions and logical consistency in understanding law.
Use of Language and Concepts
Analyzes legal terms and their meanings to clarify the nature of legal concepts like rights, duties, and obligations.
Prominent Thinkers
Jeremy Bentham: Considered the father of Analytical Jurisprudence; emphasized law as commands backed by sanctions.
John Austin: Developed the "Command Theory" of law, defining law as orders from the sovereign backed by threats.
H.L.A. Hart (later thinker): Refined Analytical Jurisprudence by distinguishing primary and secondary legal rules.
Core Ideas
1. Law as Commands
Laws are commands given by a sovereign.
The sovereign is obeyed by the majority and does not obey any higher authority.
Commands are backed by sanctions or punishments.
2. Rights and Duties
Rights correspond to duties; if A has a right, others have a duty to respect it.
Rights are legal constructs and analyzed as such.
Case Law Illustrations
Case 1: A.K. Roy v. Union of India (1982)
Context: The court dealt with the question of suspension of fundamental rights during emergency.
Relation: The court's analysis focused on the legal validity of government orders during emergency, reflecting the analytical approach—looking at law as a system of rules and commands, independent of moral considerations.
Principle: The court held that legal validity depends on the authority issuing the order, not on moral judgment.
Case 2: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Context: The court analyzed the scope of Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.
Relation: The court used precise legal reasoning and analysis of constitutional provisions to determine the limits of law-making power.
Principle: This reflects analytical jurisprudence through focus on the legal structure and hierarchy of norms.
Summary Table
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Law | System of commands/rules issued by sovereign |
| Law & Morality | Separate realms; law's validity not dependent on morality |
| Focus | Clarity, logical analysis of legal concepts |
| Key Thinkers | Bentham, Austin, Hart |
| Rights & Duties | Legal rights correspond to legal duties |
| Case Example 1 | A.K. Roy v. Union of India (legal validity of commands) |
| Case Example 2 | Kesavananda Bharati (legal structure and powers) |
Conclusion
The Analytical School of Jurisprudence offers a scientific and objective approach to understanding law by focusing on its structure and rules, rather than social or moral values. It provides a foundation for studying law as a logical system of commands, which courts and legal practitioners apply and interpret.
RELATED Blog
0 comments