International Commercial Arbitration at Sierra Leone
International Commercial Arbitration in Sierra Leone
International Commercial Arbitration (ICA) in Sierra Leone is a developing legal mechanism for resolving cross-border commercial disputes outside of traditional court litigation. Here’s an overview of the current landscape:
1. Legal Framework
Arbitration Act: Sierra Leone's arbitration law is primarily governed by the Arbitration Act, Cap 25, Laws of Sierra Leone. However, this law is largely outdated and not fully aligned with international standards such as the UNCITRAL Model Law.
International Treaties:
Sierra Leone is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). This means arbitral awards made in other Convention countries are enforceable in Sierra Leone, subject to certain conditions.
As a member of the Commonwealth and various African regional organizations, Sierra Leone participates in broader legal frameworks for trade and investment dispute resolution.
2. Arbitration Institutions
Sierra Leone does not yet have a well-established domestic arbitration institution for international disputes.
Parties often opt to arbitrate under internationally recognized bodies such as:
ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)
LCIA (London Court of International Arbitration)
ICSID (for investor-state disputes)
3. Government and Judicial Attitude
The judiciary in Sierra Leone is generally supportive of arbitration, but there is limited experience in handling complex international arbitration matters.
Court delays and lack of specialized commercial courts make arbitration an attractive alternative for foreign investors.
4. Key Challenges
Outdated Arbitration Law: Not aligned with modern standards like the UNCITRAL Model Law.
Limited Institutional Support: Lack of a national arbitration center or trained arbitrators.
Judicial Familiarity: Courts may lack the experience to interpret and enforce arbitral awards effectively.
Infrastructure: Logistical and infrastructural constraints may affect efficient conduct of proceedings.
5. Opportunities and Development
Reform Potential: There is room for Sierra Leone to modernize its arbitration framework by adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law and developing local arbitral institutions.
Capacity Building: Training legal professionals and judges in international arbitration could significantly improve the arbitration environment.
Regional Integration: Tapping into regional arbitration centers (e.g., Kigali, Lagos, Nairobi) may offer practical alternatives until local systems are strengthened.
Conclusion
Sierra Leone is in the early stages of developing a robust regime for international commercial arbitration. While the legal and institutional infrastructure is currently limited, its accession to international treaties like the New York Convention signals a commitment to improve. For now, international investors and businesses seeking arbitration in Sierra Leone often turn to foreign institutions but may benefit from reforms if Sierra Leone modernizes its arbitration laws and infrastructure.
RELATED Blog
0 comments