International Commercial Arbitration at Vanuatu
International Commercial Arbitration in Vanuatu
1. Legal Framework
Arbitration Act (Cap. 166)
Vanuatu’s arbitration regime is governed by the Arbitration Act [Cap 166], which is an older piece of legislation and not based on the UNCITRAL Model Law. The Act allows arbitration agreements to be enforced and arbitral awards to be recognized but lacks many modern arbitration features.
As of now, Vanuatu has not adopted a comprehensive, modern arbitration law, although discussions about legal reform have been ongoing in the region to align with international standards.
2. International Treaties
New York Convention
Vanuatu is not a party to the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which is a significant limitation. This means that foreign arbitral awards may not be automatically enforceable in Vanuatu and vice versa.
As a result, enforcement of international arbitral awards relies heavily on common law principles of comity and reciprocity or on any specific bilateral agreements.
3. Judicial Attitude and Support
Vanuatu’s courts generally uphold arbitration agreements and support dispute resolution through arbitration where legally recognized.
However, due to the outdated arbitration law, judicial support is more limited, and court involvement in international commercial arbitration is rare.
4. Institutional Support
No dedicated international arbitration center currently operates in Vanuatu.
Most international commercial disputes involving Vanuatu-based parties are arbitrated outside the country, often under institutions like:
SIAC (Singapore)
ICC (Paris)
LCIA (London)
PCA (The Hague)
5. Advantages and Use Cases
Confidentiality and party autonomy are recognized in arbitration in Vanuatu.
Vanuatu’s stable legal environment and use of English common law principles make it relatively predictable for legal interpretation.
International businesses may still include arbitration clauses in contracts involving Vanuatu, choosing offshore arbitration venues for neutrality and enforceability.
6. Challenges
No New York Convention Membership: Makes international award enforcement uncertain.
Outdated Arbitration Law: Does not reflect modern best practices or the UNCITRAL Model Law.
Lack of Institutional Infrastructure: No local arbitration centers or broad professional expertise in international arbitration.
Limited Precedents: Few reported cases on international arbitration, leading to legal uncertainty.
Summary
Vanuatu has a basic legal framework for arbitration through its Arbitration Act [Cap 166], but it lacks the modern features expected for international commercial arbitration. It is not a party to the New York Convention, and has no dedicated arbitration institution, limiting its role as a seat for international arbitration. Most international disputes involving Vanuatu are arbitrated offshore under internationally recognized institutions. Legal reforms and potential accession to international treaties could enhance Vanuatu’s arbitration profile in the future.
RELATED Blog
0 comments