Interpretation of Statutes at Malta
Here’s an overview of Interpretation of Statutes in Malta, focusing on the legal framework and key principles guiding statutory interpretation:
⚖️ Interpretation of Statutes in Malta
1. Legal System Context
Malta has a mixed legal system combining civil law (influenced by Roman and Napoleonic law) and common law traditions (from British rule).
The Constitution of Malta (1964) is the supreme law.
Statutory interpretation is carried out within this mixed framework.
2. Legal Framework for Interpretation
The Interpretation Act (Chapter 1 of the Laws of Malta) provides foundational rules for interpreting Maltese legislation.
Courts also rely on common law principles of statutory interpretation, especially due to the British influence.
3. Principles of Statutory Interpretation
Literal Rule:
The starting point is the ordinary and natural meaning of the words in the statute.
Golden Rule:
Modifying the literal meaning to avoid absurd or unjust outcomes.
Mischief Rule:
Focusing on the problem the legislation intends to address.
Purposive Approach:
Emphasis on the intent and purpose behind the statute.
Contextual Interpretation:
Considering the statute as a whole and in the context of related laws.
4. Judicial Practice
Maltese courts, including the Civil Court and the Court of Appeal, interpret statutes using these principles.
The Constitutional Court ensures conformity of statutes with the Constitution.
Precedents from Maltese courts and, at times, from British courts are influential.
5. Constitutional and EU Law Influence
Statutes must be interpreted consistently with the Constitution of Malta.
As an EU member, Malta also ensures interpretation aligns with European Union law and European Court of Justice jurisprudence.
Summary
Malta’s statutory interpretation blends civil and common law principles, guided by the Interpretation Act, constitutional supremacy, and EU law obligations. Courts emphasize literal, purposive, and contextual approaches to ensure faithful application of legislative intent.
0 comments