Schools of Jurisprudence
Schools of Jurisprudence: Detailed Explanation
1. Introduction
Jurisprudence is the philosophy or science of law.
It seeks to understand the nature, sources, and purpose of law.
Over time, scholars have developed different schools of thought to explain what law is and how it functions.
These are known as Schools of Jurisprudence.
2. Major Schools of Jurisprudence
A) Natural Law School
Basic Idea: Law is based on universal moral principles inherent in human nature.
Law must conform to natural justice and morality.
If a law is unjust, it is not a true law.
This school believes that law is discoverable through reason and conscience.
Key Features:
Law is eternal and unchanging.
There is a higher law above man-made laws.
Human laws inconsistent with natural law are invalid.
Case Law Illustration:
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
The court emphasized the principle of natural justice.
It held that the right to life and personal liberty includes principles of fairness and reasonableness, reflecting natural law thinking.
B) Legal Positivism School
Basic Idea: Law is the command of the sovereign or the state.
Law is man-made, distinct from morality.
A valid law is valid even if it is unjust.
Focus is on law as it is, not as it ought to be.
Key Features:
Law is created by legitimate authority.
Law must be obeyed irrespective of its moral content.
Separation of law and morality.
Case Law Illustration:
Keshavan Madhava Menon v. State of Bombay (1951)
The court upheld laws passed by the legislature regardless of moral considerations.
It emphasized obedience to the law as a command from the sovereign.
C) Historical School
Basic Idea: Law is the product of the historical development of society.
Law evolves with customs, traditions, and social practices.
Past laws and traditions are important in understanding the present law.
Key Features:
Law is an expression of the spirit of the people (“Volksgeist”).
Emphasis on customs and continuity.
Change in law should respect historical context.
Case Law Illustration:
Shamim Ara v. State of UP (2002)
The court referred to customs and social practices in deciding on personal laws.
Shows the influence of historical school in judicial reasoning.
D) Sociological School
Basic Idea: Law should focus on social realities and social welfare.
Law is a tool for social engineering and reform.
Laws must adapt to changing social conditions.
Key Features:
Emphasis on social purpose of law.
Law must promote justice and social welfare.
Judicial activism often guided by this approach.
Case Law Illustration:
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
The court considered the social impact of constitutional amendments.
Emphasized law’s role in balancing social interests.
E) Realist School
Basic Idea: Law is what the courts actually do in practice.
Focus on judicial decisions rather than written laws.
Law is seen as a means to achieve practical outcomes.
Key Features:
Emphasis on actual behavior of judges.
Law is dynamic and influenced by social forces.
Judicial discretion is significant.
Case Law Illustration:
R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla v. Union of India (1957)
The court’s decision reflected practical considerations over strict legal theory.
Illustrates realist approach where law adapts to social needs.
3. Summary Table
| School | Basic Idea | View of Law | Case Law Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Law | Law based on morality and justice | Law = Moral principles | Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India |
| Legal Positivism | Law is command of sovereign | Law = Man-made rules | Keshavan Madhava Menon v. State |
| Historical | Law evolves from customs and traditions | Law = Social heritage | Shamim Ara v. State of UP |
| Sociological | Law as tool for social reform | Law = Social engineering | Kesavananda Bharati v. Kerala |
| Realist | Law = what courts do in practice | Law = Judicial decisions | R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla v. India |
4. Conclusion
The schools of jurisprudence offer different lenses to understand law.
No single school fully explains law; modern jurisprudence often blends these views.
Courts often apply principles from multiple schools depending on context.
RELATED Blog
0 comments