Difference Between Lockout and Closure
Difference Between Lockout and Closure
1. Definition and Nature
| Aspect | Lockout | Closure |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | Temporary refusal by the employer to allow employees to work, typically during a dispute. | Permanent or indefinite shutting down of the entire business or part of it by the employer. |
| Nature of Action | Employer locks the doors to prevent work as a pressure tactic during an industrial dispute. | Employer ceases operations, either temporarily or permanently, often due to economic reasons. |
| Purpose | To resist demands of employees or trade unions, especially in wage or service conditions disputes. | To close the business unit due to loss, redundancy, or decision to stop production. |
2. Duration
| Aspect | Lockout | Closure |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | Generally temporary, lasts until the dispute is resolved or terms agreed. | Usually permanent or indefinite; can be temporary but with intention to close. |
3. Effect on Employment
| Aspect | Lockout | Closure |
|---|---|---|
| Employment Status | Employees remain employed but are prevented from working. | Employment is terminated or suspended due to closure. |
4. Legal and Industrial Relations Implications
| Aspect | Lockout | Closure |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial Action | Employer’s weapon in an industrial dispute. | Not necessarily linked to dispute; could be economic or operational. |
| Impact on Trade Unions | Affects union activity as employees cannot work. | Union may lose bargaining power if closure is permanent. |
5. Examples from Case Law
Lockout Case:
Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa (1978)
Facts: The Board locked out employees during an industrial dispute.
Principle: The Supreme Court held that lockout is a legitimate weapon in the hands of employers to resist employees’ demands but must be done in good faith and not as a punitive measure.
Significance: Lockout is a temporary refusal of work, and the employer should follow procedural fairness.
Closure Case:
Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Waterfront Workers (1986)
Facts: The company decided to close down a plant due to economic unviability.
Principle: Closure implies a permanent or indefinite cessation of business and leads to termination of employment.
Significance: Closure is a business decision, distinct from lockout, and requires proper notice to employees.
6. Summary Table of Differences
| Parameter | Lockout | Closure |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Employer temporarily prevents employees from working during a dispute. | Employer permanently or indefinitely stops business operations. |
| Purpose | To compel employees to accept employer’s terms. | To discontinue business due to economic/operational reasons. |
| Duration | Temporary | Permanent or indefinite |
| Effect on Employment | Employees remain employed but locked out. | Employees’ service is terminated or suspended. |
| Nature | Industrial dispute weapon | Business decision |
| Legal Requirement | Must be in good faith and not punitive | Requires notice and procedural compliance |
7. Conclusion
Lockout is a temporary, tactical measure by the employer in response to industrial disputes.
Closure is a permanent or indefinite shutdown of operations, often unrelated to disputes but to business needs.
Courts recognize lockout as a legitimate industrial action but expect it to be exercised responsibly.
RELATED Blog
0 comments