Interpretation of Statutes at Malaysia
Here’s an overview of Interpretation of Statutes in Malaysia, highlighting how laws are interpreted and applied within the Malaysian legal system:
⚖️ Legal System Context in Malaysia
Malaysia follows a common law system, heavily influenced by English law due to its colonial history.
The Federal Constitution of Malaysia (1957) is the supreme law.
Statutory interpretation balances common law principles with constitutional mandates and local statutes.
📜 Principles of Statutory Interpretation in Malaysia
Literal Rule (Plain Meaning Rule)
Courts first look at the ordinary and natural meaning of the words in the statute.
If the wording is clear, it is applied as written.
Golden Rule
If literal interpretation leads to absurd or unreasonable results, courts may modify the meaning to avoid such outcomes.
Mischief Rule (Purposive Approach)
Courts consider the mischief or problem the statute aims to address.
Interpretation seeks to promote the legislative intent and purpose.
Contextual and Harmonious Interpretation
Statutes are interpreted in context with the whole Act and related laws to avoid contradictions.
Presumption of Constitutionality
All statutes are presumed to comply with the Federal Constitution unless clearly proven otherwise.
Ambiguities are resolved to uphold constitutional validity.
Use of Extrinsic Aids
Courts may refer to:
Parliamentary debates (Hansard)
Explanatory notes
International treaties (if incorporated)
Previous case law
🏛️ Judicial Authorities
The Federal Court of Malaysia is the highest court and its interpretations are binding.
The Court of Appeal and High Courts also interpret statutes within their jurisdiction.
Decisions of the Federal Court set important precedents.
📚 Key Legislative Instruments
Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967 guide statutory interpretation across Malaysia.
These Acts include provisions on definitions, computation of time, and application of laws.
RELATED Blog
0 comments