International Commercial Arbitration at North Korea
International Commercial Arbitration in North Korea (officially the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, DPRK) is a highly restricted and opaque area due to the country’s unique political, legal, and economic system. Here is an overview of the current status and challenges of international arbitration in North Korea:
📘 Legal Framework
1. Foreign-related Arbitration Law of DPRK (1999)
This is the main law governing arbitration involving foreign parties.
It covers:
Arbitration procedures involving foreign-invested enterprises
Dispute resolution mechanisms for joint ventures and trade disputes
Recognition and enforcement of awards
However, detailed procedures and enforcement standards are not publicly transparent.
2. Not a Party to the New York Convention
North Korea is not a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
This significantly limits the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards within North Korea and vice versa.
🏛️ Arbitration Institutions
Korean International Trade Arbitration Commission (KITAC)
Established under the Korea International Trade Promotion Committee.
Based in Pyongyang, KITAC is the only known arbitration body in North Korea.
Jurisdiction includes:
Disputes between foreign and local parties
Joint venture and trade contract disputes
KITAC claims to apply principles similar to international arbitration rules but operates with limited transparency.
⚖️ Legal and Practical Challenges
Lack of transparency in arbitration procedures and awards.
Limited access to foreign legal counsel or neutral arbitrators.
No effective enforcement of foreign arbitral awards due to non-accession to the New York Convention.
Judicial independence and neutrality are highly questionable under the political regime.
Foreign businesses in North Korea are extremely limited due to sanctions and political risks.
🛑 Sanctions and International Relations
The DPRK is under extensive international sanctions (UN, US, EU, etc.), affecting:
Foreign investment
Financial transactions
Legal cooperation
These sanctions further limit the viability and practicality of international commercial arbitration.
✅ Theoretical Possibility vs. Practical Reality
In theory, foreign parties can arbitrate disputes in North Korea under KITAC rules if specified in a contract.
In practice, however:
Very few (if any) international arbitrations are known to have taken place transparently.
Foreign investors are extremely cautious, and international arbitration is often not considered reliable in DPRK.
🌍 Alternatives for Dispute Resolution
If doing business involving North Korea:
Consider using neutral third-country jurisdictions (e.g., China, Singapore) for arbitration.
Include clear dispute resolution clauses choosing a neutral seat, applicable law, and arbitration institution.
Work through governmental or intergovernmental channels, especially for state-related contracts.
Summary:
| Feature | North Korea |
|---|---|
| Primary Arbitration Law | Foreign-related Arbitration Law (1999) |
| Main Institution | Korean International Trade Arbitration Commission (KITAC) |
| New York Convention Member? | ❌ No |
| Transparency | ❌ Very Low |
| Enforcement of Foreign Awards | ❌ Not guaranteed |
| International Use | 🔴 Extremely limited |
RELATED Blog
0 comments