Customary Law in India

Customary Law in India

What is Customary Law?

Customary Law consists of rules and practices that have evolved through long usage and acceptance by a particular community or group.

It is unwritten law, originating from social habits, traditions, and practices.

It governs personal, social, economic, or religious affairs within communities.

Customs gain the force of law when they are reasonable, certain, continuous, and accepted as binding by the community.

Characteristics of Customary Law

CharacteristicExplanation
Long usageMust be practiced over a long period continuously
ReasonablenessCustom must be fair and not against public policy
CertaintyShould be clear and definite, not vague or ambiguous
Obligatory natureMust be accepted as binding by the community
ConsistencyMust not conflict with existing laws or morality

Types of Customs in India

Religious Customs: Traditions followed by religious communities (e.g., Hindu customs of marriage).

Tribal Customs: Practices followed by various tribal groups (e.g., inheritance rules among tribes).

Local Customs: Customs specific to a region or community (e.g., business customs, social practices).

Family Customs: Customs governing family matters like marriage, succession, divorce.

Role of Customary Law in India

Customary law is recognized and applied by courts wherever applicable and consistent with justice and morality.

It fills gaps where no statutory law exists.

It governs personal laws, property rights, inheritance, marriage, and other social relations.

Courts uphold customs unless they conflict with fundamental rights or statutory provisions.

Case Law Illustrations

1. Madras Local Board v. A. Venkataswami (1921)

Issue: Whether a particular local custom was binding in respect of land rights.

Decision: The court held that a custom, if reasonable and certain, and not in conflict with law or morality, is binding.

Principle: Custom can be treated as law if it fulfills conditions of long usage and reasonableness.

2. M.C. Chockalingam v. Union of India (1953)

Issue: Validity of a tribal custom regarding inheritance.

Decision: The court recognized tribal customs as valid if they are not against public policy or statutory law.

Principle: Tribal customary laws have legal force unless they violate fundamental principles.

3. Kedar Nath v. State of West Bengal (1953)

Issue: Whether a customary practice could override statutory provisions regarding marriage.

Decision: The court held that customs must yield where they conflict with statutory law or public policy.

Principle: Custom cannot override the express provisions of law.

4. Shastri Yagnapurushadasji v. Muldas Bhundardas Vaishya (1966)

Issue: Whether caste customs were binding on members.

Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that customs must be reasonable and certain to be enforceable.

Principle: Even caste customs have to meet the test of fairness and consistency.

Interaction with Statutory Law and Fundamental Rights

Customary law is subject to constitutional principles like equality and non-discrimination.

If a custom violates fundamental rights or statutory provisions, courts will declare it invalid.

Courts often harmonize customs with modern legal principles to maintain social justice.

Summary Table

AspectExplanation
DefinitionRules from long-standing community practices
Conditions for recognitionLong usage, reasonableness, certainty, acceptance
ScopeFamily law, inheritance, tribal rights, social customs
Court’s roleEnforce unless conflicting with law or morality
LimitationsCannot override statutory law or fundamental rights

Final Note:

Customary law in India plays a crucial role in preserving cultural identity and providing justice in diverse communities, especially where formal laws are silent or inadequate.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments