Do ‘Law’ and ‘Justice’ have different Meanings?

Do ‘Law’ and ‘Justice’ Have Different Meanings?

1. Definition of Law

Law is a system of rules created and enforced by the state or a recognized authority to regulate behavior.

It is written, codified, and systematic — designed to maintain order, resolve disputes, and protect rights.

Laws are objective, general, and apply uniformly to everyone within jurisdiction.

Key Points About Law:

Positive law: Established rules enacted by legislature or recognized authority.

Enforceability: Laws are backed by sanctions or penalties.

Certainty: Law provides clarity and predictability.

Examples: Traffic laws, contract laws, criminal laws.

2. Definition of Justice

Justice is a broader, philosophical concept concerned with fairness, morality, equity, and righteousness.

It represents the ideal or goal that laws seek to achieve.

Justice is subjective and contextual, often influenced by societal values and ethical considerations.

Key Points About Justice:

Moral foundation: Justice appeals to what is morally right.

Equity: Sometimes demands flexibility beyond rigid law.

Dynamic: Concept of justice evolves with social progress.

Examples: Fair treatment, equitable remedies, protecting human dignity.

3. Difference Between Law and Justice

AspectLawJustice
NatureSet of established rulesAbstract ideal of fairness
SourceEnacted by legislature or authorityRooted in morality, ethics, and conscience
ApplicationApplied uniformly without discriminationMay require equitable or individualized treatment
EnforcementBacked by sanctions and penaltiesNot enforceable by itself; serves as guiding principle
ScopeNarrow and specificBroad and philosophical
ChangeabilityCan be rigid; requires formal amendmentEvolves with societal values

4. Relationship Between Law and Justice

Law is the instrument or means to achieve justice.

However, law may not always result in justice.

Sometimes laws may be unjust, and justice demands reform or interpretation.

The ideal legal system tries to harmonize law with justice.

5. Judicial Perspective and Case Law

Case 1: Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

Issue: Whether Parliament can amend the Constitution to alter fundamental rights.

Judgment: The Supreme Court recognized that law must conform to the “basic structure” which embodies justice, liberty, and equality.

Principle: Law must uphold constitutional justice; it cannot violate essential human rights or fairness.

Case 2: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India

Issue: Whether a law depriving a person of their passport violated the right to life and personal liberty.

Judgment: The Court expanded the meaning of “life” to include dignity and personal liberty, underscoring that law must be just and fair, not arbitrary.

Principle: Mere legality is insufficient; law must achieve justice.

Case 3: Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Observation: The Court observed that “Justice is the ultimate goal of law”.

Implication: The administration of law must always aim to realize justice.

6. Illustrative Example

Suppose a law mandates strict punishment for theft of a loaf of bread, even if the theft was driven by hunger.

The law might be clear and enforceable, but justice may demand leniency or rehabilitation.

Here, the law is rigid; justice calls for compassion.

7. Summary

FeatureLawJustice
What is it?Codified rulesEthical ideal
PurposeRegulate societyFairness and moral rightness
NatureObjective and formalSubjective and flexible
Can law be unjust?YesJustice is always just
RelationshipLaw aims to deliver justiceJustice guides the law

Conclusion

Law and Justice are related but distinct concepts.

Law is a system of enforceable rules, while justice is the higher principle of fairness and morality those rules should aim to realize.

Courts often interpret laws to ensure that justice prevails, even if laws seem rigid.

The ideal legal system balances law’s certainty with justice’s fairness.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments