Do ‘Law’ and ‘Justice’ have different Meanings?
Do ‘Law’ and ‘Justice’ Have Different Meanings?
1. Definition of Law
Law is a system of rules created and enforced by the state or a recognized authority to regulate behavior.
It is written, codified, and systematic — designed to maintain order, resolve disputes, and protect rights.
Laws are objective, general, and apply uniformly to everyone within jurisdiction.
Key Points About Law:
Positive law: Established rules enacted by legislature or recognized authority.
Enforceability: Laws are backed by sanctions or penalties.
Certainty: Law provides clarity and predictability.
Examples: Traffic laws, contract laws, criminal laws.
2. Definition of Justice
Justice is a broader, philosophical concept concerned with fairness, morality, equity, and righteousness.
It represents the ideal or goal that laws seek to achieve.
Justice is subjective and contextual, often influenced by societal values and ethical considerations.
Key Points About Justice:
Moral foundation: Justice appeals to what is morally right.
Equity: Sometimes demands flexibility beyond rigid law.
Dynamic: Concept of justice evolves with social progress.
Examples: Fair treatment, equitable remedies, protecting human dignity.
3. Difference Between Law and Justice
Aspect | Law | Justice |
---|---|---|
Nature | Set of established rules | Abstract ideal of fairness |
Source | Enacted by legislature or authority | Rooted in morality, ethics, and conscience |
Application | Applied uniformly without discrimination | May require equitable or individualized treatment |
Enforcement | Backed by sanctions and penalties | Not enforceable by itself; serves as guiding principle |
Scope | Narrow and specific | Broad and philosophical |
Changeability | Can be rigid; requires formal amendment | Evolves with societal values |
4. Relationship Between Law and Justice
Law is the instrument or means to achieve justice.
However, law may not always result in justice.
Sometimes laws may be unjust, and justice demands reform or interpretation.
The ideal legal system tries to harmonize law with justice.
5. Judicial Perspective and Case Law
Case 1: Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Issue: Whether Parliament can amend the Constitution to alter fundamental rights.
Judgment: The Supreme Court recognized that law must conform to the “basic structure” which embodies justice, liberty, and equality.
Principle: Law must uphold constitutional justice; it cannot violate essential human rights or fairness.
Case 2: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Issue: Whether a law depriving a person of their passport violated the right to life and personal liberty.
Judgment: The Court expanded the meaning of “life” to include dignity and personal liberty, underscoring that law must be just and fair, not arbitrary.
Principle: Mere legality is insufficient; law must achieve justice.
Case 3: Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Observation: The Court observed that “Justice is the ultimate goal of law”.
Implication: The administration of law must always aim to realize justice.
6. Illustrative Example
Suppose a law mandates strict punishment for theft of a loaf of bread, even if the theft was driven by hunger.
The law might be clear and enforceable, but justice may demand leniency or rehabilitation.
Here, the law is rigid; justice calls for compassion.
7. Summary
Feature | Law | Justice |
---|---|---|
What is it? | Codified rules | Ethical ideal |
Purpose | Regulate society | Fairness and moral rightness |
Nature | Objective and formal | Subjective and flexible |
Can law be unjust? | Yes | Justice is always just |
Relationship | Law aims to deliver justice | Justice guides the law |
Conclusion
Law and Justice are related but distinct concepts.
Law is a system of enforceable rules, while justice is the higher principle of fairness and morality those rules should aim to realize.
Courts often interpret laws to ensure that justice prevails, even if laws seem rigid.
The ideal legal system balances law’s certainty with justice’s fairness.
0 comments