Interpretation of Statutes at Iceland
Interpretation of Statutes in Iceland – Overview
Iceland follows a civil law system with influences from Nordic legal traditions, particularly from Denmark and Norway. While statutes are the primary source of law, judicial decisions, legal scholarship, and customary law also play a significant role. Interpretation of statutes in Iceland focuses on the text, purpose, and context of the law, with an increasing emphasis on constitutional rights and international obligations.
Legal Framework for Interpretation
Constitution of Iceland (Stjórnarskrá lýðveldisins Íslands, No. 33/1944)
The supreme law of the land.
Statutes must be interpreted and applied consistently with constitutional principles, particularly fundamental rights.
General Statutory Law
No single codified interpretation statute, but methods are developed through case law and legal doctrine.
European and International Law
Iceland is a member of the European Economic Area (EEA) and Schengen Area, and its laws are influenced by EU regulations, EEA law, and international treaties (e.g., human rights conventions).
Principles of Statutory Interpretation in Iceland
1. Literal (Grammatical) Interpretation
Courts begin with the ordinary meaning of the statutory text.
If the language is clear, it is applied as written.
2. Systematic Interpretation
Statutes are interpreted in the context of the entire legal system, ensuring coherence with other laws and legal principles.
3. Teleological (Purposive) Interpretation
If the wording is unclear or ambiguous, courts seek to determine the legislative purpose behind the statute.
Legal materials such as parliamentary debates (Althingi records) and government reports are used to understand legislative intent.
4. Historical Interpretation
Courts may consider the legislative history and background of a law to clarify ambiguous provisions.
5. Constitutional and Human Rights Interpretation
Since Iceland incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law (Act No. 62/1994), courts interpret statutes in a way that is consistent with human rights protections.
Role of Judicial Precedent
While Iceland is a civil law country, decisions of the Supreme Court of Iceland (Hæstiréttur Íslands) carry strong persuasive authority.
Courts often cite previous judgments for consistency, especially in constitutional and administrative matters.
Use of Interpretation Aids
Preparatory works (lögskýringargögn), including:
Bill proposals
Committee reports
Parliamentary records
Legal doctrine and academic writing
International law, especially EEA and human rights law
Summary
Statutory interpretation in Iceland is guided by:
Literal reading of the text as the starting point
A focus on the intent and purpose of legislation
Use of systematic and historical methods
Strong influence of constitutional rights and international obligations
Guidance from Supreme Court decisions, though not strictly binding
RELATED Blog
0 comments