International Commercial Arbitration at Somalia
Here’s an overview of International Commercial Arbitration in Somalia:
1. Legal Framework
Somalia’s legal and institutional framework is fragile and underdeveloped due to decades of civil conflict and instability.
There is no comprehensive national arbitration law aligned with the UNCITRAL Model Law or other international standards.
Arbitration provisions, if any, tend to be scattered within commercial laws or based on remnants of colonial laws and Islamic law principles.
Some regions (such as Somaliland) may have their own local laws, but these are not internationally recognized as separate jurisdictions.
2. Recognition and Enforcement
Somalia is not a signatory to the New York Convention (1958).
Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards is highly uncertain due to the lack of an effective judiciary and coherent legal infrastructure.
Local courts have limited capacity and experience in arbitration matters, and political instability further complicates enforcement.
3. Institutional and Judicial Support
There are no established arbitration institutions or centers in Somalia.
Arbitration clauses often specify foreign seats (e.g., Dubai, London, Nairobi) to avoid the unpredictable local legal environment.
The judiciary’s support for arbitration is minimal due to limited institutional capacity.
4. Practical Considerations
For international commercial disputes involving Somali parties, it is common and advisable to choose arbitration in a neutral, stable jurisdiction.
International institutions like ICC, LCIA, DIAC, or Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) are preferred.
Arbitration clauses must be carefully drafted to specify:
Seat of arbitration outside Somalia
Governing law (often English law, or law of a neutral country)
Arbitration rules (e.g., ICC or UNCITRAL)
5. Summary
| Aspect | Status in Somalia |
|---|---|
| Arbitration law | No modern national law |
| New York Convention | Not a party |
| Local arbitration centers | None |
| Preferred seat for arbitration | Neutral foreign venues |
| Enforcement of awards | Highly uncertain, dependent on local courts |
6. Recommendations
Avoid choosing Somalia as the seat for arbitration in international contracts.
Specify arbitration under recognized international rules and institutions.
Consider international enforcement mechanisms (such as New York Convention) by choosing arbitration seats in signatory countries.
Obtain expert legal advice on structuring dispute resolution clauses involving Somali entities.
RELATED Blog
0 comments