Jurisprudence Law at Jordan
Jurisprudence Law in Jordan
Jordan’s legal system is a civil law system that integrates elements of Islamic (Sharia) law, Ottoman law, French civil law, and customary tribal practices. Its legal structure reflects the country’s historical, religious, and colonial legacies, resulting in a dual legal system—with separate courts for civil/criminal matters and personal status (family law) issues governed by Sharia.
Key Features of the Jordanian Legal System:
Constitutional Framework:
The Constitution of Jordan (1952) is the supreme law of the country and outlines the structure of government, the powers of the monarchy, and basic rights of citizens.
Jordan is a constitutional monarchy, with King Abdullah II as the head of state. The Constitution guarantees certain rights, such as equality before the law, freedom of religion, and freedom of expression, though these are often subject to legal and political limitations.
Mixed Legal Tradition:
Civil Law System: Rooted in the French Napoleonic Code, particularly in areas such as contracts, property, and obligations.
Sharia Law: Applies primarily in personal status matters (e.g., marriage, divorce, child custody, and inheritance) for Muslims, administered by Sharia courts.
Customary Law (Urf): In rural and Bedouin communities, tribal customary law is often informally observed, particularly in dispute resolution.
Sources of Law:
Constitution
Legislation (statutes, royal decrees, and regulations)
Sharia (primarily Hanafi school for Sunni Muslims)
Judicial precedents (to a limited extent)
Customary practices
Judicial System of Jordan:
Civil and Criminal Courts:
Regular Courts: Handle most civil and criminal cases; include the Court of First Instance, Courts of Appeal, and the Court of Cassation (highest court).
Constitutional Court (est. 2012): Reviews the constitutionality of laws and regulations.
Religious Courts:
Sharia Courts: Govern matters of family law and inheritance for Muslims. They follow the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence.
Ecclesiastical Courts: Handle personal status matters for non-Muslim religious communities (e.g., Christians).
State Security Court:
A controversial court that tries crimes such as terrorism, espionage, and some press offenses. It has both military and civilian judges and has been criticized for lacking due process protections.
Key Areas of Jurisprudence in Jordan:
Personal Status Law:
Muslim Personal Status Law is governed by Sharia and applies to matters such as:
Marriage: Men may marry up to four wives; women need male guardian approval.
Divorce: Easier for men to initiate (talaq); women face legal hurdles.
Inheritance: Follows Sharia rules (e.g., male heirs receive twice the share of female heirs).
Non-Muslims are governed by their respective religious community courts.
Criminal Law:
Governed by the Jordanian Penal Code (1960).
Criminal justice reforms have been enacted to combat honor crimes, but leniency for male perpetrators still exists in some cases.
There is no death penalty moratorium, though executions are rare.
Human Rights and Freedoms:
Jordan’s Constitution recognizes certain rights, but freedom of speech, assembly, and press are constrained under laws like the Cybercrime Law and Penal Code provisions.
Administrative detention under the Crime Prevention Law allows governors to detain individuals without trial, often used against activists.
Administrative Law:
The High Court of Justice reviews administrative actions and ensures the legality of decisions made by public officials.
Citizens can challenge government actions, but success is rare in politically sensitive cases.
Commercial and Civil Law:
Largely modeled on French civil law, governing contracts, corporations, banking, and property.
Jordan has modernized its investment and corporate laws to attract foreign investment, aligning with international standards.
International Law and Treaties:
Jordan is a signatory to many international human rights treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) (with reservations).
International law can be applied in domestic courts if incorporated through legislation.
Notable Legal Developments and Cases:
Constitutional Court Establishment (2012): Marked a significant step in constitutional jurisprudence, allowing for judicial review of laws for compatibility with the Constitution.
Cybercrime Law Amendments (2023): Expanded state powers to curb online speech, raising alarms among rights advocates.
Honor Crimes Reform (2017): Repeal of Article 308 (which allowed rapists to escape punishment by marrying the victim) marked progress in women’s rights.
Challenges in Jordanian Jurisprudence:
Judicial Independence: While courts are formally independent, executive influence remains significant, especially in politically sensitive cases.
Gender Inequality: Discriminatory laws persist in areas of family law, citizenship rights, and employment.
Freedom of Expression: Laws regulating media, assembly, and online activity are used to stifle dissent.
RELATED Blog
0 comments