Marital Rape Debate In Indian Criminal Law
Introduction
Marital rape refers to non-consensual sexual intercourse by a husband with his wife. In India, the issue is contentious because of the exception in Section 375 IPC which excludes sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife (above 18 years) from the definition of rape, effectively making marital rape legal.
This exception raises questions about women's bodily autonomy, consent within marriage, and human rights.
Legal Framework
Section 375 IPC (Exception 2): “Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under 18 years of age, is not rape.”
Section 376 IPC: Prescribes punishment for rape but excludes marital rape.
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: Addresses violence in marriage but does not criminalize marital rape.
Constitutional guarantees: Right to equality (Article 14), right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), including bodily autonomy.
Key Case Law and Judicial Views
1. Independent Thought v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 800
Facts: Challenge to the marital rape exception in the context of sexual intercourse with a minor wife (under 18 years).
Holding: Supreme Court struck down the exception in cases involving minor wives, declaring sexual intercourse with a minor wife as rape.
Significance: Did not address marital rape involving adult wives, but marked recognition that marriage does not give absolute sexual rights.
2. Rupan Deol Bajaj v. K.P.S. Gill, AIR 1995 SC 309
Facts: Sexual harassment at workplace.
Holding: Recognized sexual harassment and emphasized consent.
Relevance: Though not marital rape, laid groundwork for recognizing consent as essential in sexual matters.
3. Soni Gerry v. Gerry Douglas, AIR 1971 Bom 64
Facts: Matrimonial dispute involving allegations of rape.
Holding: The Bombay High Court held that a husband cannot be prosecuted for rape of his wife.
Significance: Early judicial endorsement of marital rape exemption based on the idea of implied consent in marriage.
4. Nipun Saxena & Another v. Union of India & Others, 2019 (Delhi High Court)
Issue: Direct challenge to the constitutionality of Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC.
Holding: Delhi High Court acknowledged the need for legislative reform but upheld the exception as currently in law.
Significance: Highlighted judiciary’s hesitance to judicially legislate on this issue, emphasizing legislative role.
5. Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India, AIR 1995 SC 1531
Facts: Related to conversion and bigamy but also discussed marriage and consent.
Holding: The Court highlighted the importance of consent and individual rights within marriage.
Relevance: Indirectly informs the debate on marital rape and autonomy.
6. Sakshi v. Union of India, WP (C) No. 176 of 2013 (Delhi High Court)
Facts: Public Interest Litigation seeking criminalization of marital rape.
Holding: The Court refused to criminalize marital rape, suggesting the legislature is better suited to decide.
Significance: Reaffirmed judicial restraint but emphasized the need for legislative reconsideration.
Judicial Reasoning Behind Marital Rape Exception
Presumption of consent: Marriage implies consent to sexual relations.
Protection of family institution: Criminalizing marital rape seen as potentially disruptive.
Social and cultural factors: Traditional views on marriage and gender roles.
Legislative domain: Courts often defer to Parliament for changes.
Criticism and Calls for Reform
Violation of bodily autonomy: Marriage does not nullify a woman’s right to consent.
Human rights perspective: International norms (CEDAW) urge criminalization.
Inadequacy of current protections: Domestic Violence Act and other laws do not adequately protect against marital rape.
Increasing activism: NGOs and scholars press for legislative amendment.
Current Status and Legislative Developments
The exception remains in force for adult wives.
Several bills proposed in Parliament to criminalize marital rape, but none enacted yet.
Increasing public discourse and judicial sensitivity suggest possible future reforms.
Summary
| Aspect | Current Law | Judicial Stance | Social Perspective |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marital Rape (Adult Wife) | Exempted under Section 375 IPC | Courts uphold legislative role | Traditional norms persist |
| Marital Rape (Minor Wife) | Not exempted after Independent Thought | Recognized as rape | Widely accepted reform |
| Consent & Bodily Autonomy | Required in principle | Recognized but limited in marriage | Growing awareness and activism |
| Criminalization Debate | Ongoing legislative discussion | Courts defer to legislature | Strong calls for reform |
Conclusion
The marital rape debate in Indian criminal law is at a crossroads between entrenched societal norms and evolving human rights principles. Judicial activism has acknowledged the issue but largely left it to the legislature to act. Continued advocacy and legislative reform are critical for aligning Indian law with contemporary values of consent and dignity.
RELATED Blog
0 comments