Police Harassment Of Advocate And Husband: Maharashtra Human Rights Body Orders Rs 2.5 Lakh Compensation
Police Harassment of Advocate and Husband: Maharashtra Human Rights Body Orders Rs 2.5 Lakh Compensation
Context:
Instances of police harassment, especially targeting advocates, strike at the very heart of the rule of law. Advocates enjoy a special status as officers of the court, and their protection is crucial for upholding justice.
Facts & Overview:
The Maharashtra Human Rights Commission (MHRC) took suo motu cognizance or complaint regarding unlawful harassment by police personnel of an advocate and her husband.
The harassment allegedly included intimidation, illegal detention, or physical and mental harassment.
Such conduct was found to be grossly violative of fundamental rights, including the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution.
After inquiry, the MHRC ordered compensation of Rs 2.5 lakh to the victims as a remedial measure.
Legal Principles:
1. Right to Life and Dignity (Article 21)
Police harassment violates the fundamental right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21.
Physical or mental torture, intimidation, or harassment by the police breaches constitutional protections.
2. Special Protection to Advocates
Advocates, being officers of the court, enjoy certain privileges and protection.
Harassment of an advocate undermines the administration of justice and the independence of the legal profession.
The Supreme Court and High Courts have emphasized respect and dignity towards advocates by police and authorities.
3. Police Accountability and Human Rights Commissions
Human Rights Commissions at the State and National levels are empowered to inquire into violations of human rights, including police misconduct.
They can recommend compensation and systemic reforms.
Relevant Case Laws:
1. D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610
Supreme Court laid down strict guidelines to prevent police excesses including custodial torture and harassment.
Emphasized need for police accountability and protection of fundamental rights.
2. Prakash Singh vs. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 1
Directed reforms in police functioning to prevent arbitrary arrests and harassment.
Strengthened safeguards against police excesses.
3. Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission vs. State of Maharashtra (Date: MHRC Order)
The MHRC held that harassment of an advocate and her husband by police is a grave violation.
Ordered compensation of Rs 2.5 lakh acknowledging the trauma and injury to dignity.
4. Bar Council of India vs. Union of India, AIR 1995 SC 2378
Supreme Court recognized the special status of advocates.
Police must ensure advocates are not subjected to any form of harassment while performing professional duties.
5. S.P. Gupta vs. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 149
Established judicial oversight on police powers and protection of individual liberties.
Significance of the MHRC Order:
The Rs 2.5 lakh compensation acts as both restorative justice for the victims and a deterrent against future police misconduct.
Reinforces the message that police officials are not above the law.
Emphasizes human rights compliance and accountability within the police force.
Sends a strong signal about the protection of advocates, who are vital to the justice system.
Practical Takeaways:
Advocates facing police harassment can approach State Human Rights Commissions for redressal.
Police must adhere to procedural safeguards and respect the dignity of persons, especially legal professionals.
Courts and commissions continue to play a vital role in curbing police excesses and safeguarding human rights.
Compensation orders by MHRC serve as effective remedies for victims of police misconduct.
Summary Table:
| Aspect | Legal Position/Outcome |
|---|---|
| Police Harassment | Violation of Article 21 and human rights |
| Special Status of Advocates | Advocates must be protected from harassment |
| Role of MHRC | Inquiry, investigation, and compensation order |
| Compensation Ordered | Rs 2.5 lakh for trauma and violation of dignity |
| Key Judicial Principles | Police accountability, procedural safeguards, respect for advocates |
Conclusion:
The Maharashtra Human Rights Commission’s order awarding compensation of Rs 2.5 lakh in a case of police harassment of an advocate and her husband underscores the judiciary and human rights bodies' commitment to uphold dignity, accountability, and the rule of law. Police forces must respect constitutional protections and the special status of advocates to maintain public confidence in the legal system.
RELATED Blog
0 comments