Pocso Act Digital Offences
Overview: POCSO Act and Digital Offences
The POCSO Act was enacted to protect children (below 18 years) from sexual offences such as sexual assault, harassment, and pornography. With the rise of digital technology, the Act also extends to offences involving digital media, like child pornography, online sexual harassment, and exploitation via digital platforms.
Important Sections Related to Digital Offences Under POCSO Act
Section 11: Punishment for using a child for pornographic purposes.
Section 13: Punishment for storing or transmitting child pornography.
Section 14: Punishment for abetment of child pornography.
Section 67B of IT Act (Information Technology Act, 2000): Punishment for publishing or transmitting child pornography digitally.
Case Law Explaining POCSO Act Digital Offences
1. State of Tamil Nadu v. S. Shanmugam (2014)
Facts: The accused was involved in circulating child pornography through WhatsApp groups and social media platforms.
Issue: Whether digital transmission of child pornography amounts to a POCSO offence.
Judgment: The court held that transmission, sharing, or circulation of child pornography via digital platforms is a grave offence under the POCSO Act and IT Act. It emphasized that the act of sharing or forwarding such material promotes sexual exploitation and warrants stringent punishment.
Significance: This case clarified that digital communication channels like WhatsApp or social media are covered under POCSO for offences related to child pornography.
2. Anurag Anand v. State of Maharashtra (2016)
Facts: The accused groomed a minor girl through online chat platforms and coerced her into sharing obscene videos.
Issue: Whether online grooming and coercion under POCSO are punishable.
Judgment: The court ruled that online grooming and coercion for sexual purposes fall squarely within the ambit of the POCSO Act. It highlighted that the Act protects children from all forms of sexual exploitation, including those perpetrated through digital means.
Significance: This judgment expanded the scope of POCSO to cover "online grooming" or digital coercion.
3. Nisha Yadav v. State of NCT Delhi (2018)
Facts: The accused shared explicit videos of a minor girl without her consent on social media.
Issue: Whether unauthorized sharing of minor’s intimate images is punishable under POCSO.
Judgment: The court held the accused guilty under Section 11 and 13 of the POCSO Act as well as relevant IT Act provisions, underscoring that unauthorized circulation of such images constitutes sexual exploitation.
Significance: This case reinforced the liability of offenders for circulating child sexual images without consent.
4. XYZ v. Union of India (2019) – Online Child Abuse Case
Facts: A case was filed where offenders used online platforms to lure children into producing obscene content.
Issue: Applicability of POCSO Act in online sexual abuse.
Judgment: The court emphasized that the POCSO Act applies fully to online offences and ordered stricter monitoring and reporting mechanisms for digital platforms to prevent child exploitation.
Significance: This led to greater accountability for internet service providers and social media platforms to monitor child abuse content.
5. State of Karnataka v. Rahul (2020)
Facts: The accused sent sexually explicit messages and videos to a minor through social media.
Issue: Can sending sexually explicit digital content be considered sexual harassment under POCSO?
Judgment: The court ruled that sending sexually explicit digital content or messages to a minor constitutes sexual harassment under Section 11 of the POCSO Act and punishable accordingly.
Significance: This case broadened the definition of sexual harassment under POCSO to include digital communication.
Summary of Key Takeaways:
The POCSO Act covers digital forms of sexual offences, including online grooming, child pornography, and sharing of explicit images/videos.
The IT Act provisions complement POCSO by punishing digital transmission, publication, and storage of child sexual abuse material.
Courts have consistently recognized online harassment, grooming, and exploitation as serious offences under POCSO.
Digital offences under POCSO demand stricter punishments and preventive mechanisms because of the widespread and rapid nature of digital communication.
RELATED Blog
0 comments