Independent Office For Police Conduct Investigations
π I. What is the IOPC?
Independent of the police and government
Created under Police Reform Act 2002, expanded under Policing and Crime Act 2017
Replaced the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) in 2018
Investigates:
Deaths in police custody or following police contact
Serious injuries
Allegations of excessive force, corruption, discrimination
Breaches of Code of Ethics and Human Rights
π Landmark IOPC-Related Cases
πΉ 1. Azelle Rodney Inquiry (R v. E7) [2013]
Facts:
Azelle Rodney was shot and killed by a Metropolitan Police officer in 2005. The IPCC (now IOPC) and an inquiry investigated whether the killing was lawful.
Legal Issue:
Was lethal force used lawfully?
Outcome:
The officer (E7) was charged with murder (later acquitted). However, the inquiry and later legal review heavily criticised the use of intelligence and rules of engagement.
Principle:
β‘ IOPC plays a vital role in reviewing use of deadly force and ensuring transparency, even if charges donβt always follow.
πΉ 2. Mark Duggan Case [2011β2019]
Facts:
Mark Duggan was shot by police in Tottenham. The incident sparked major public unrest and riots.
Investigation:
The IPCC (now IOPC) investigated the shooting, especially claims that Duggan was armed and posed a threat.
Legal Outcome:
The officer was not charged; the inquest jury found the killing was lawful, but the IOPC faced scrutiny for initial misleading communication.
Principle:
β‘ Importance of clear, early communication and evidence handling by the IOPC in public trust matters.
πΉ 3. Dalian Atkinson Case [2021] β R v. Monk
Facts:
Former footballer Dalian Atkinson died after being tasered and kicked by PC Benjamin Monk. The IOPC investigated the case.
Legal Outcome:
PC Monk was found guilty of manslaughterβthe first time in over 30 years that a police officer was convicted over a death in custody.
Principle:
β‘ IOPC investigations can lead to successful prosecutions, showing the system can hold police criminally liable.
πΉ 4. Sean Rigg Case [2008β2019]
Facts:
Sean Rigg, a man with mental health issues, died in police custody in Brixton. The IPCC originally found no misconduct.
Development:
Following a judicial review, the IOPC reopened the investigation, leading to disciplinary proceedings and institutional reforms.
Principle:
β‘ Judicial oversight of IOPC decisions ensures thoroughness and transparency; flawed reports can be challenged.
πΉ 5. Kevin Clarke Case [2020β2022]
Facts:
Kevin Clarke, a vulnerable Black man, died after being restrained by Met officers. The IOPC found officers failed to recognise signs of acute mental illness.
Legal Outcome:
An inquest found the police actions contributed to his death. IOPC referred the case to CPS, but no prosecution followed.
Principle:
β‘ IOPC pressures police to improve protocols on mental health response and restraint techniques.
πΉ 6. Anthony Grainger Case [2012β2019]
Facts:
Grainger was shot by police while unarmed. The IPCC and later IOPC criticised intelligence failures and operational planning.
Legal Impact:
No officer prosecuted, but the forceβs planning was deemed unlawful.
Principle:
β‘ IOPCβs role includes holding entire forces accountable, not just individual officers.
πΉ 7. Ian Tomlinson Case [2009β2011]
Facts:
Tomlinson, a bystander during the G20 protests, died after being pushed by a police officer. The officer initially claimed no contact.
Investigation:
IPCC (now IOPC) used video evidence from civilians to contradict the police account.
Legal Outcome:
Officer charged with manslaughter (acquitted); family received civil damages.
Principle:
β‘ Civilian evidence can reshape IOPC investigations, especially in public disorder cases.
π§Ύ Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Key Issue | IOPC Role |
|---|---|---|
| Azelle Rodney | Lethal force | Reviewed shoot-to-kill procedures |
| Mark Duggan | Public unrest | Scrutiny of initial IOPC handling |
| Dalian Atkinson | Taser death | Led to successful officer prosecution |
| Sean Rigg | Mental health + custody death | Report judicially reviewed, reopened |
| Kevin Clarke | Restraint + mental illness | Found systemic failure in care |
| Anthony Grainger | Intelligence failure | Highlighted force-wide planning lapses |
| Ian Tomlinson | Protest policing | Civilian video overturned police narrative |
βοΈ Core Functions of IOPC Investigations
Investigate Misconduct β serious cases like deaths, racial abuse, sexual misconduct
Refer for Prosecution β if evidence supports criminal charges
Recommend Disciplinary Action β against individual officers or commanders
Public Reports & Inquests β transparency on use of force, discrimination, etc.
Challengeable in Courts β through judicial review (e.g. Sean Rigg case)
π§ Quick Review Questions
What powers does the IOPC have over police forces and officers?
How does the IOPC handle cases where no criminal charge is brought?
Can families or victims challenge IOPC findings?
What role does public or video evidence play in modern investigations?
What lessons emerged from the Dalian Atkinson case?
RELATED Blog
0 comments