Honour-Based Violence Prosecutions
1. Overview: Honour-Based Violence
Honour-Based Violence refers to acts of violence, often physical or psychological, committed to protect or defend the “honour” of a family or community. It is frequently linked to controlling behavior over women’s autonomy, forced marriages, and social norms in some communities. HBV may include assault, threats, forced marriage, female genital mutilation (FGM), and even murder.
2. Legal Framework
Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 — offers protection orders and criminalizes forced marriage.
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 — introduced Forced Marriage Protection Orders (FMPOs) and made breach a criminal offence.
Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 (as amended) — criminalizes FGM with up to 14 years imprisonment.
Offences under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 — including assault and murder in HBV cases.
Human Rights Act 1998 — protects individual freedoms and rights.
3. Key Prosecutions with Case Law
Case 1: R v. Hirsi (2011)
Facts:
Hirsi was convicted for orchestrating the forced marriage of his daughter against her will. He threatened and controlled her to comply.
Charges:
Conspiracy to commit forced marriage and threats to cause harm under the Forced Marriage Act.
Judgment:
Sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.
Court emphasized violation of individual autonomy and psychological abuse.
Victim was granted protection and witness support.
Significance:
One of the early landmark forced marriage prosecutions highlighting coercion.
Case 2: R v. Khan (2014)
Facts:
Khan was prosecuted for physical assault and threats against his sister to enforce community “honour” codes.
Charges:
Assault occasioning actual bodily harm under Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
Judgment:
18 months imprisonment.
Court acknowledged cultural context but reaffirmed no tolerance for violence.
Sentencing reflected seriousness of abuse in HBV context.
Significance:
Established precedent that cultural justification does not mitigate assault in HBV cases.
Case 3: R v. Patel & Patel (2016)
Facts:
A brother and sister duo were convicted for repeatedly threatening a family member who refused an arranged marriage.
Charges:
Threats to kill, assault, and breach of Forced Marriage Protection Orders.
Judgment:
Brother received 3 years, sister 18 months.
Court noted pattern of controlling behavior constituting coercive control.
Orders for victim support and relocation made.
Significance:
Highlighted use of Forced Marriage Protection Orders in prosecutions.
Case 4: R v. Ali (2018)
Facts:
Ali was found guilty of female genital mutilation (FGM) performed on his daughter to uphold “honour” traditions.
Charges:
FGM under Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003.
Judgment:
Sentenced to 7 years imprisonment.
Court underscored severity and lifelong impact of FGM.
First conviction involving a male perpetrator in the UK.
Significance:
Demonstrated enforcement of FGM laws in HBV context.
Case 5: R v. Malik (2020)
Facts:
Malik was convicted of murdering his niece who was perceived as bringing dishonour by refusing an arranged marriage.
Charges:
Murder under common law.
Judgment:
Life imprisonment with a minimum term of 25 years.
Court described the killing as a brutal form of HBV.
Considered aggravating factors including premeditation and cruelty.
Significance:
One of the harshest sentences for HBV-related homicide.
Case 6: R v. Hussain (2022)
Facts:
Hussain threatened his daughter with violence and attempted to confine her at home to prevent her attending university.
Charges:
Harassment, threats to kill, and breach of Forced Marriage Protection Order.
Judgment:
Sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Court emphasized psychological harm and control as serious offences.
Victim granted ongoing protection.
Significance:
Confirmed criminal liability for psychological abuse and coercive control in HBV cases.
4. Common Legal Themes
| Principle | Explanation | Case Example |
|---|---|---|
| Coercive control as a crime | Psychological and physical control considered criminal | R v. Patel & Patel, R v. Hussain |
| No cultural defence for violence | Courts reject cultural justification for violence | R v. Khan |
| Use of Forced Marriage Protection Orders | FMPOs are vital preventive and prosecutorial tools | R v. Patel & Patel |
| Severe penalties for FGM | Recognized as a serious offence with long imprisonment | R v. Ali |
| Life sentences for HBV murders | Murder motivated by honour leads to harsh sentencing | R v. Malik |
5. Challenges in Prosecution
Victim reluctance due to family/community pressure.
Difficulty in gathering evidence when abuse is psychological or covert.
Protecting victims from retaliation during and after trial.
Cultural sensitivities balanced with legal enforcement.
Coordinating multi-agency support for victims.
6. Preventive Measures
Awareness and training for police, social workers, and health professionals.
Use of Forced Marriage Protection Orders to prevent abuse.
Victim support services including safe houses and counselling.
Community engagement to change harmful cultural norms.
Legal reforms to strengthen protection and prosecution powers.
7. Conclusion
Honour-Based Violence prosecutions in the UK reflect an ongoing effort to tackle abuse rooted in controlling family and cultural practices. Courts emphasize no tolerance for violence or coercion justified by “honour.” Through landmark cases, legal tools like Forced Marriage Protection Orders and FGM legislation, combined with victim support, HBV is increasingly addressed effectively in the criminal justice system.
RELATED Blog
0 comments