Case Law On Restorative Justice For Juveniles
1. Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, AIR 2011 SC 3361
Facts:
This landmark case dealt with child rights and juvenile justice, particularly concerning trafficking and exploitation of children.
Held:
The Supreme Court emphasized the need for a child-friendly approach in the juvenile justice system.
Advocated for restorative justice principles: rehabilitation and social reintegration rather than retributive justice.
The Court stressed the importance of a child-friendly inquiry and keeping the child's best interests paramount.
Directed states to set up special juvenile courts and ensure speedy trials with a restorative focus.
Impact:
This judgment became a cornerstone for juvenile restorative justice, influencing reforms in juvenile laws and procedural safeguards.
2. Sheela Barse v. Union of India, AIR 1986 SC 1773
Facts:
The petition highlighted the plight of juveniles in custody and the need for reforms in the juvenile justice system.
Held:
The Supreme Court directed that juveniles should not be tried or punished like adults.
Emphasized rehabilitation and social reintegration, aligning with restorative justice.
Held that correctional homes and reformatories should focus on education, counseling, and skill development.
Importance:
Paved the way for emphasizing restorative justice over punitive measures for juvenile offenders.
3. In Re: Gaurav Kumar Bansal v. Union of India, AIR 2017 SC 3009
Facts:
Petition concerning the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and its provisions regarding heinous offences by juveniles.
Held:
The Court balanced the need for accountability with restorative principles.
Held that while juveniles committing heinous crimes can be tried as adults under certain conditions, the focus should remain on rehabilitation.
Directed that juveniles’ psychological and social background must be considered.
Affirmed that the juvenile justice system should facilitate restorative justice, including victim-offender mediation.
Impact:
Reinforced restorative justice as a guiding principle even when juveniles commit serious offences.
4. Mohd. Arif v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India, (2002) 3 SCC 344
Facts:
The case dealt with the release and rehabilitation of juveniles and the principles guiding their treatment post-adjudication.
Held:
The Supreme Court emphasized that the juvenile justice system should be a welfare system, not just a punitive system.
Held that juveniles should be given opportunities for education and vocational training as part of restorative justice.
Highlighted the need for community involvement in the rehabilitation process.
Significance:
This judgment underlined the importance of community and social support in the restorative justice process for juveniles.
5. Ms. X v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 467
Facts:
This case focused on the rights of juvenile victims and offenders in sexual offence cases.
Held:
The Court ruled that the juvenile justice system should prioritize the best interests of both victim and juvenile offender.
Advocated for restorative approaches such as counseling, mediation, and family support.
Emphasized the importance of psychological rehabilitation and protection of juveniles from stigmatization.
Importance:
This judgment expanded restorative justice principles to sensitive cases involving juveniles as both victims and offenders.
Summary of Restorative Justice Principles from Case Law:
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Child-friendly Approach | Juvenile proceedings must be informal, speedy, and sensitive to the child's needs. |
| Rehabilitation Focus | Emphasis on reforming the juvenile through education, counseling, and skill development. |
| Social Reintegration | Support for the juvenile’s reintegration into family and society, avoiding stigmatization. |
| Victim-Offender Mediation | Encouragement of dialogue between victims and juveniles to repair harm and build understanding. |
| Balancing Accountability | Even for serious offences, restorative justice principles guide the treatment of juveniles. |
Conclusion
Indian judiciary has progressively embraced restorative justice for juveniles, balancing accountability with rehabilitation and reintegration. Courts consistently stress a child-friendly approach, emphasizing healing, education, and social support rather than harsh punishment. These judgments have shaped juvenile justice laws and practices to align with international standards such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).
RELATED Blog
0 comments