Consent And Bodily Autonomy Provisions
I. Introduction
Consent is a fundamental principle in criminal law, especially in offences involving the human body, such as assault, sexual offences, and medical procedures. Consent refers to a voluntary and informed agreement by a person to allow something to happen or to do something.
Bodily autonomy means a person's right to self-governance over their own body without external influence or coercion. It is closely linked with personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
II. Legal Provisions Relating to Consent and Bodily Autonomy
1. Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Consent Known to be Given Under Fear or Misconception
Consent is not valid if it is given under fear of injury or under a misconception of fact.
2. Section 375 IPC – Rape
Consent is crucial in defining rape; the absence of valid consent constitutes the offence.
3. Section 87 IPC – Act not intended to cause death done by consent in good faith for person's benefit
Protects acts done in good faith with consent, such as medical procedures.
4. Section 88 IPC – Consent to Acts Done in Good Faith for Benefit of Person Giving Consent
Protects doctors and surgeons performing operations with consent.
5. Section 92 IPC – Consent to Harmful Acts Not Criminal if Done for Benefit of Person
Protects acts causing harm but done for the benefit of the person with valid consent (e.g., medical treatment).
III. Consent in Sexual Offences
Valid consent is free, informed, and not coerced.
Consent by a person under age of consent (18 years) is invalid.
Consent withdrawn at any point makes continued acts unlawful.
IV. Bodily Autonomy and Article 21
Supreme Court has recognized bodily autonomy as part of the right to privacy and dignity.
Medical interventions require informed consent.
Forced medical procedures or violations of bodily integrity violate fundamental rights.
V. Important Case Laws
1. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1
Facts:
The case primarily dealt with the right to privacy under the Indian Constitution.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 and includes bodily autonomy and self-determination. The court emphasized that every individual has the right to make choices regarding their body, including medical treatment and sexual autonomy.
Significance:
Landmark judgment affirming bodily autonomy as a constitutional right.
2. Lillu @ K. Shivananda v. State of Karnataka (2022) SCC OnLine SC 1322
Facts:
In a sexual offence case, the issue of consent was central.
Held:
The court ruled that consent must be unequivocal and voluntary. Consent given out of fear or misconception is invalid. The victim’s statement is crucial in assessing consent.
Significance:
Clarified the nature of valid consent in sexual offences.
3. Indian Medical Association v. Union of India (2018) 10 SCC 152
Facts:
Medical professionals challenged guidelines regarding consent for medical treatment.
Held:
Supreme Court stressed that informed consent is mandatory before any medical intervention, except in emergencies. Patients have the right to refuse treatment.
Significance:
Reinforced medical ethics and consent requirements.
4. State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar (1968) 3 SCR 164
Facts:
Medical practitioner was accused of causing death without consent during treatment.
Held:
Court observed that medical procedures done without valid consent could amount to criminal assault or negligence.
Significance:
Highlighted importance of consent in medical procedures.
5. R v. Clarence (1888) 22 QBD 23
Facts:
Although a UK case, it is often cited in Indian law for sexual offences.
Held:
Held that consent obtained by deception about a person’s health status can invalidate consent.
Significance:
Influential case for understanding consent under deception.
6. Tukaram S. Dighole v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 4 SCC 329
Facts:
The case dealt with consent in sexual assault allegations.
Held:
Supreme Court held that presence or absence of physical resistance is not conclusive in deciding consent. Consent must be evaluated on the overall facts and circumstances.
Significance:
Expanded understanding of consent beyond physical resistance.
VI. Summary Table of Consent Principles
| Aspect | Principle | Case Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Right to Bodily Autonomy | Part of right to privacy and dignity under Art. 21 | Justice K.S. Puttaswamy case |
| Consent must be free | No fear, coercion, or misconception | Lillu v. State of Karnataka |
| Informed medical consent | Mandatory before treatment | Indian Medical Association case |
| Consent under deception | Invalidates consent | R v. Clarence (UK case) |
| Consent evaluation | Beyond physical resistance | Tukaram S. Dighole case |
| Consent in medical acts | Without valid consent = assault/negligence | State of Maharashtra v. Mardikar |
VII. Conclusion
Consent and bodily autonomy are foundational to protecting individual rights in criminal law and medical jurisprudence. Indian courts have consistently protected these principles under constitutional law, especially Article 21, emphasizing voluntariness, informed choice, and freedom from coercion. Medical ethics and criminal law converge on requiring valid consent to ensure personal dignity and liberty.
RELATED Blog
0 comments