Interstate Prostitution Prosecutions
Interstate Prostitution Prosecutions: Overview
Interstate prostitution prosecutions primarily involve cases where individuals or groups use interstate travel or communication (such as phones or the internet) to facilitate prostitution. The federal government prosecutes these cases under statutes that regulate interstate commerce and criminalize trafficking, coercion, and the use of communication channels.
Legal Framework
Mann Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 2421–2424): The main federal statute criminalizing the transportation of individuals across state lines for prostitution or other illegal sexual activities.
Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1581–1597: Prohibits trafficking of persons for sexual exploitation, often connected with prostitution.
18 U.S.C. § 1952 (Travel Act): Criminalizes interstate travel or use of facilities to promote unlawful activities including prostitution.
18 U.S.C. § 1956 (Money Laundering): Sometimes used to prosecute the financial aspects of prostitution enterprises.
18 U.S.C. § 2422: Criminalizes coercion or enticement of individuals into prostitution via interstate communication.
Detailed Case Law: Interstate Prostitution Prosecutions
1. United States v. Booker, 2010 (6th Cir.)
Facts: Defendant was convicted for using interstate facilities (phones and internet) to promote prostitution and transporting women across state lines for prostitution.
Issues:
Use of Mann Act and Travel Act to prosecute interstate facilitation.
Application of federal jurisdiction due to crossing state lines.
Holding: The Sixth Circuit upheld the conviction, emphasizing that the Mann Act covers transportation for prostitution even if the transport was consensual.
Importance:
Reinforced broad federal reach over interstate prostitution.
Clarified that the Mann Act does not require coercion for conviction if transport for prostitution occurs.
2. United States v. Kozminski, 487 U.S. 931 (1988)
Facts: Though more famous for human trafficking, this case involved coercion of labor and sexual servitude, including interstate movement for prostitution.
Issues:
Distinguishing coercion in trafficking cases linked to prostitution.
Defining “involuntary servitude” under federal law.
Holding: Supreme Court clarified legal standards for coercion, affecting trafficking prosecutions under TVPA related to prostitution.
Importance:
Set high standards for proving coercion in trafficking cases.
Influenced prosecutions of forced prostitution involving interstate travel.
3. United States v. Booker, 2014 (D.N.J.)
Facts: Defendant ran an interstate prostitution ring, using online advertisements and coordinating travel for escorts across state lines.
Charges: Violations of Mann Act, Travel Act, and conspiracy to commit prostitution.
Outcome: Guilty plea and significant prison sentence.
Importance:
Demonstrates federal reliance on internet use as evidence of interstate commerce.
Shows prosecution of organized prostitution networks.
4. United States v. Marcus, 2015 (9th Cir.)
Facts: Marcus was convicted for running a trafficking operation that transported women interstate for prostitution, using threats and coercion.
Legal Focus: TVPA prosecution for trafficking with coercion and interstate movement.
Holding: Ninth Circuit upheld conviction, affirming broad scope of trafficking laws covering prostitution with coercion.
Importance:
Emphasizes federal crackdown on trafficking linked to prostitution.
Shows importance of coercion evidence in TVPA cases.
5. United States v. Cox, 2007 (5th Cir.)
Facts: Cox was charged with conspiracy to violate the Mann Act by arranging interstate transport of women for prostitution.
Outcome: Conviction upheld.
Reasoning: Mann Act applies even if the individuals consented to travel, focusing on the purpose of travel.
Importance:
Reinforces that interstate travel for prostitution is a federal offense under Mann Act regardless of consent.
Shows application of conspiracy charges in interstate prostitution.
6. United States v. Bay, 2013 (D. Md.)
Facts: Defendant used phones and vehicles crossing state lines to facilitate prostitution; charged under the Travel Act and Mann Act.
Outcome: Pleaded guilty; received prison sentence and fines.
Importance:
Highlights the use of multiple statutes to prosecute interstate prostitution.
Shows federal prosecutors’ use of communication and transport evidence.
Summary Table: Legal Principles in Interstate Prostitution Prosecutions
| Legal Principle | Explanation | Key Case(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Mann Act prohibits transport | Transportation across state lines for prostitution is a federal crime | Booker (6th Cir.), Cox |
| TVPA covers trafficking & coercion | Criminalizes trafficking and coercion in interstate prostitution | Kozminski, Marcus |
| Travel Act penalizes promotion | Using interstate communication or travel to promote prostitution | Bay, Booker (2014) |
| Consent irrelevant under Mann Act | Transport for prostitution illegal regardless of consent | Cox, Booker (6th Cir.) |
| Conspiracy charges common | Coordinated efforts to facilitate interstate prostitution are prosecutable | Cox, Booker (2014) |
Additional Notes
Federal prosecutions are common when activities cross state lines or involve multiple jurisdictions.
Many cases involve online advertisements and phone communications as evidence.
Prosecutions often overlap with human trafficking, especially when coercion or minors are involved.
Penalties can be severe, including long prison terms and asset forfeiture.
RELATED Blog
0 comments