White Supremacist Terrorism Prosecutions

Overview

White supremacist terrorism involves acts of violence or terror motivated by beliefs in white racial superiority, anti-government views, or hatred of minority groups. These acts often include bombings, mass shootings, threats, and organized hate crimes. The U.S. government prosecutes these acts under terrorism, hate crime, firearms, and conspiracy statutes.

Legal Framework

Federal Terrorism Laws:

18 U.S.C. § 2331 (Definition of terrorism).

18 U.S.C. § 2332a (Use of weapons of mass destruction).

18 U.S.C. § 844 (Arson and bombings).

18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (Use of firearms in violent crimes).

18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy).

18 U.S.C. § 247 (Hate crimes).

18 U.S.C. § 1114 (Assaulting federal officers, often linked with extremist violence).

Hate Crime Statutes: Many states have hate crime laws targeting violence motivated by race or ethnicity.

Material Support Laws: 18 U.S.C. § 2339A/B criminalizes providing support to terrorist organizations or individuals.

Elements Prosecutors Must Prove

The defendant committed a violent or terroristic act.

The act was motivated by white supremacist ideology or racial hatred.

The defendant intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence government policy.

Important Cases in White Supremacist Terrorism Prosecutions

1. United States v. Dylann Roof (2017)

Facts: Roof killed nine African American churchgoers in Charleston, SC, motivated by white supremacist beliefs.

Charges: Federal hate crimes, obstruction of religion, and firearm offenses.

Outcome: Convicted and sentenced to death.

Significance: First federal hate crime prosecution resulting in the death penalty; emphasized federal commitment to combating white supremacist terrorism.

2. United States v. Timothy Wilson (2019)

Facts: Wilson was arrested for plotting to bomb a synagogue and federal building, inspired by white supremacist ideology.

Charges: Conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, material support for terrorism.

Outcome: Pleaded guilty; sentenced to 20 years.

Significance: Showed use of federal terrorism statutes against planned white supremacist attacks.

3. United States v. Wade Michael Page (2017)

Facts: Page, a former Army soldier linked to white supremacist groups, killed five people at a Wisconsin Sikh temple.

Charges: Federal hate crimes and weapons charges.

Outcome: Died by suicide before trial; case emphasized prevention of extremist violence.

Significance: Highlighted dangers of white supremacist infiltration in the military and extremist violence at religious sites.

4. United States v. Christopher Hasson (2019)

Facts: Hasson, a Coast Guard officer, was arrested for planning attacks targeting minorities and government officials, motivated by white supremacist ideology.

Charges: Illegal weapons possession, conspiracy to commit terrorism, and possession of controlled substances.

Outcome: Pleaded guilty; sentenced to over 13 years.

Significance: Demonstrated federal efforts to detect and prosecute domestic terrorism within military ranks.

5. United States v. Robert Bowers (2020)

Facts: Bowers was charged after the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, killing 11 people, motivated by anti-Semitic and white supremacist beliefs.

Charges: Hate crimes, obstruction of religious practice, use of a firearm in a violent crime, and murder.

Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to multiple life terms without parole.

Significance: Largest mass murder prosecution related to white supremacist terrorism in U.S. history.

6. United States v. William Atchison (2021)

Facts: Atchison planned a mass shooting inspired by white supremacist ideology and domestic terrorism.

Charges: Federal firearms and explosives charges, conspiracy to commit terrorism.

Outcome: Pleaded guilty; sentenced to 15 years.

Significance: Underlined federal focus on thwarting planned white supremacist attacks before execution.

Summary Table

CaseYearChargesOutcomeSignificance
United States v. Roof2017Hate crimes, obstruction of religionConvicted, death penaltyFirst death penalty in federal hate crime case
United States v. Wilson2019Conspiracy to use WMD, terrorism supportGuilty plea, 20 yearsTerrorism statutes against planned attacks
United States v. Page2017Hate crimes, weapons offensesSuicide before trialWhite supremacist violence at religious site
United States v. Hasson2019Conspiracy, weapons possession, terrorismGuilty plea, 13+ yearsDomestic terrorism within military
United States v. Bowers2020Hate crimes, obstruction, murderConvicted, life sentencesLargest white supremacist mass murder case
United States v. Atchison2021Firearms, explosives, terrorism conspiracyGuilty plea, 15 yearsPrevention of planned white supremacist attack

Additional Notes

Prosecutions often rely on extensive digital evidence, including social media posts, manifestos, and chat group communications.

The FBI and DOJ have specialized units dedicated to domestic terrorism and white supremacist extremism.

Sentencing often includes life imprisonment or death penalty in cases involving multiple murders.

Many defendants have military or law enforcement backgrounds, raising concerns about radicalization in these institutions.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments