Joinder of Charges under CrPC
🔹 What is Joinder of Charges?
Joinder of charges refers to the procedure where multiple offenses (charges) are combined and tried together in the same trial. This can involve:
Multiple offenses committed by the same accused,
Offenses committed by different accused persons, or
A combination of offenses affecting the same or different parties arising out of the same transaction or connected transactions.
The objective is to avoid multiplicity of trials and ensure judicial economy.
🔹 Legal Provisions Regarding Joinder of Charges
The main provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) related to joinder of charges are:
1. Section 219 CrPC — Trial of several offenses of the same kind or of different kinds:
If a person is accused of two or more offenses of the same kind (e.g., two thefts), or of different kinds (e.g., theft and assault), the Court may, if it thinks fit, try them together or separately.
2. Section 220 CrPC — Trial of several persons for the same offense or for different offenses:
If more than one person is accused of the same offense or different offenses arising out of the same transaction, the Court may, if it thinks fit, try all or any of them together or separately.
Summary:
| Section | Application |
|---|---|
| Section 219 | Joinder of offenses against the same person. |
| Section 220 | Joinder of offenses against several persons. |
🔹 When is Joinder of Charges Allowed?
The offenses relate to the same transaction or series of transactions.
The offenses are of similar or different kinds, but connected.
To ensure efficient trial and avoid conflicting judgments.
Joinder must not cause prejudice to the accused.
🔹 Procedure for Joinder of Charges:
The Court, upon receiving the charges, can frame joint charges if offenses satisfy the joinder criteria.
If offenses are unrelated, the Court may refuse to join charges and order separate trials.
Joinder can be requested by prosecution or can be ordered suo motu by the Court.
If the accused raise objections, the Court examines whether joinder causes prejudice or injustice.
🔹 Judicial Principles on Joinder of Charges
The Court has discretion to join or separate trials, but this discretion must be exercised judicially.
No abuse of process: Joinder should not be used to complicate or delay the trial.
Avoidance of prejudice: Joinder should not unfairly prejudice the accused.
Joinder is meant to expedite justice and avoid inconsistent decisions.
🔹 Important Case Law on Joinder of Charges
1. State of Maharashtra v. Bhaurao Baburao Tatkare, AIR 1965 SC 1710
Issue: Whether joinder of charges for multiple offenses in the same trial is permissible.
Held: The Supreme Court held that joinder is permissible under Sections 219 and 220 CrPC provided offenses are connected and do not cause prejudice.
Significance: Established that joinder aims at convenience and economy of judicial process.
2. Prem Lata v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2012) 12 SCC 633
Issue: Whether joinder of multiple offenses and accused persons is permissible.
Held: The Court held that joinder is permissible if offenses are connected by the same transaction or series of transactions and do not prejudice the accused.
Significance: Emphasized that the Court’s discretion must be exercised judiciously to prevent abuse of process.
3. Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana, (2015) 10 SCC 534
Issue: Whether joinder of charges should be allowed where there is a possibility of prejudice to accused.
Held: The Supreme Court reiterated that if joinder causes prejudice to accused, the Court may order separate trials.
Significance: The interest of justice and fairness to the accused are paramount in joinder decisions.
4. Dinkar Manibhai Desai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1964 SC 1483
Issue: Joinder of several persons in trial for different offenses.
Held: The Court held that joinder is permissible if the offenses arise out of the same transaction or closely connected transactions.
Significance: Recognized the convenience and prevention of multiplicity of trials as reasons for joinder.
🔹 Practical Examples:
A person accused of committing both theft and assault during the same incident can be tried for both offenses in a single trial.
Multiple accused involved in a robbery case can be tried together for the robbery and related offenses.
Offenses of cheating and forgery arising from the same fraudulent transaction can be joined.
🔹 Conclusion:
Joinder of charges under the CrPC is a procedural mechanism to consolidate related offenses and trials involving the same or different accused. It promotes judicial economy and avoids conflicting verdicts, but the Court must carefully ensure that the joinder does not cause prejudice or hamper the fair trial of the accused.
The discretion to join charges is subject to judicial prudence and the facts and circumstances of each case, as highlighted in several Supreme Court decisions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments